Originally posted by Klostrophobic
Have you thought of the bandwidth? Just think of the waste the "How many replies can we get" thread in the Rumble strip would cause if a couple people had pics in their signatures.
Originally posted by Klostrophobic
That sounds like a very stupid idea to me.
Have you thought of the bandwidth? Just think of the waste the "How many replies can we get" thread in the Rumble strip would cause if a couple people had pics in their signatures.
My reasons exactly, LoudMusic.Originally posted by LoudMusic
Once they've been downloaded by the user they will be cached for future referance. It was the idea before he moved to the new server, but I think the new reason would have more to do with a consistancy to the look and feel of the website. If he starts letting everyone put images in their signatures, it will get crazy ugly before too long.
~LoudMusic
Originally posted by Jordan
My reasons exactly, LoudMusic.![]()
Originally posted by Josh
That's exactly why Jordan has that feature disabled...![]()
Originally posted by Stealth Viper
![]()
Originally posted by Josh
To be safe in the future, I'm just going to wait and see what LoudMusic has to say, and then I'll add my :2cents:...![]()
Originally posted by pupik
Please, please, please DO NOT allow pics in signatures. Who here really wants to see the same 800x600 image one hundred times? Not me. And even though you can turn sigs off, many of us roam computers at work, school, grandma's house, jail, et al don't bother for a mere 10 minutes of 'net time.
Animated avatars, overuse of smilies, and super-long signatures are already part of the "game", but pics in the sigs is a waste of time for everyone.
All in all, this is a great forum; well divided with categories unlike the mess the GTF's non-GT categories were turning into. Keep up the great work!