ITCC_Andrew
(Banned)
- 18,532
- Kitchener
Brake in a straight line mate.
Indy Road Course = not always possible. Certainly, it's great advice, but, mistakes-and curving braking zones-happen. I just want to point it out.
Brake in a straight line mate.
Yes, Ridox, I agree. I plan on tuning on comfort tires, to start, so that driving on racing tires is easy.
However, in your signature alone, I see proof of talent. Not everyone can drive on comfort tires. I prefer 500 PP, but, I can drive any car at those specs, with any compound, but 600 pp on comfort tires would be a challenge...
MrMelancholy15Indy Road Course = not always possible. Certainly, it's great advice, but, mistakes-and curving braking zones-happen. I just want to point it out.
Back to my Problem.
I did all possible configurations, but still shocked by the way this car handles. One of you have mentioned to break in straight line, but unfortunately it's not always possible. See the problem whid this is that I'm using steering wheel (G27) and breaking in straight line is not always an option, specially when the race gets intense. What kills me the most, is how little break pressure it takes for the car to swing its back end. And when it comes to speed, well let's just not go there... It starts under 120Km and bad timing on countersteering and I can find myself facing 90°.
P.S. Thanks to those of you, who helping me understand this car. And to everybody else who thinks that it has something to do with my driving skills, I'm looking forward to settle this on the track like a man...
Feel free to add me in PlayStation Network > (MR-LEV) and we'll go from there.
Once again, Thank you for your feedback.
Back to my Problem.
I did all possible configurations, but still shocked by the way this car handles. One of you have mentioned to break in straight line, but unfortunately it's not always possible. See the problem whid this is that I'm using steering wheel (G27) and breaking in straight line is not always an option, specially when the race gets intense. What kills me the most, is how little break pressure it takes for the car to swing its back end. And when it comes to speed, well let's just not go there... It starts under 120Km and bad timing on countersteering and I can find myself facing 90°.
P.S. Thanks to those of you, who helping me understand this car. And to everybody else who thinks that it has something to do with my driving skills, I'm looking forward to settle this on the track like a man...
Feel free to add me in PlayStation Network > (MR-LEV) and we'll go from there.
Once again, Thank you for your feedback.
The car's 2-way LSD makes it very stable at the back. It gets twitchy because the open diff. at the front allows one wheel to lock-up under braking destabilizing the car. If you turn the wheel or downshift at this point you're gonna go for a ride. I find actually increasing rear brake bias helps to balance the car by stabilizing the front and lossening up the rear. Something like 4 front, 6 rear works surprizingly well with the stock LSD (opening the rear diff., as I mentioned before, does the same thing). Though you do have to be mindful of the rear end with this setup. Just an observation.
Limiting downshifts definitely helps to keep the car stable and it's gear ratios are tight enough to keep it in the power.
I think the 2012 car is a lot more fun than last years model.
Wow, if you are having trouble driving this car... Try adjusting the brake bias. Mine is set at 3F2R. Otherwise you need to learn to drive. You kids expect every car to handle like its on rails. Its a simulator, this is how the car drives. Adjust your driving style, which probably sucks.
Is this in general or is this set for the Ring? I'm asking because the ride height seems very low for the Ring.i think the cars lack of downforce are catching out a lot of people... it is odd that its technically a 'race car' but no downforce but what PD have given us is a real good challenge... i turned down the toe values and adjusted the rear diff threw some camber on it it helped iron it out but still traces of snap brake oversteer was very evident and i lowered it 40mm... i left the cars springs, dampers, but stiffened the swaybars aswell... so the setup is something like this...
Ride Height: F -40 / R -40
Anti Rollbars: F 4 / R 4
Camber: F -3.9 / R -3.0
Toe: F -30 / +15
LSD: Rear -
- Inital Torque - 15
- Accel - 30
- Deccel - 15
not too sure what its like but anyway
A_Higher_PlaceCan't stand all these tunes with Engine and power upgrades. It's mean't to be raced with the power its given!! Can't stand turbos and engine upgrades on race cars. Defeats the purpose and reasoning in my opinion.
MrMelancholy15*Insert scumbag meme*
"Oh, MrM publicly said that he wants to tune a car"
"Let's tune the same car, and add way too much ballast and way too much horsepower."
"Yeah! That's awesome, broskiye!"
Thanks, gentlemen, for being respectful.
Argon56Not sure I understand what all the beef is about this car, I just took it completely stock and no aids apart from ABS=1 with RH tyres (tires) for 2 laps around Nurb 24 and clocked a 9:08:329. By no means a quick lap but it's pretty reasonable and I found it a pretty well behaved car and a sub 9 lap is definitely possible.
Update: By Comparison a completely stock GTR Black Edition straight from the dealership which has an almost identical PP rating and I also ran completely stock with RH tyres, no aids except ABS=1 did the Nurb 24 in 8:56.757!