- 28,461
- Brooklyn, NY
- KR_Viper
- I Renown I
This is the discussion thread for an article on GTPlanet:


I will definitely agree with this, they should have marketed it better and made it clear the difference in focus. A name change like Project Cars Subtitle Here would have helped too but I wonder if part of the Bamco contract was for a "3".Man, this game. I thought it was good. But the marketing of it was absolutely awful. I think they were going to call it something totally different, but the publishers made them change it. If they just did what they were going to - make a more easily accessible arcadey-type racer as a spin off, I think it would have been successful. Or at least a fun diversion between mainline titles.
You'd think if they de-list it, they could at least put it on sale for really cheap
Ian Bell confirmed the original plan for Project CARS 3 was to be a spinoff, but that decision got overruled by investors:I will definitely agree with this, they should have marketed it better and made it clear the difference in focus. A name change like Project Cars Subtitle Here would have helped too but I wonder if part of the Bamco contract was for a "3".
Ian Bell on the fiasco that is Project Cars 3:
"Project CARS 3 is the one game that I didn't directly input the minutia. Every game leading up to that I was directly involved in, and would drive the car constantly, feedback constantly. But during the Project CARS 3 development, I stepped back and, once we were taken over by Codemasters, I was advised to stop being involved in the micro details completely. I'm not sure that was an overall positive. Additionally, we didn't want to call it Project CARS 3 at all. I sat around the table with twenty other people at Codemasters and openly stated that we wanted to call it Project CARS: Sideways, giving the community an indication that we're going off in a different direction, to have sort of semi-open-world areas.
The idea was that we'd go in a Forza Horizon direction as compared to Forza Motorsport. I was overruled, and I was overruled because I was told that the investors were insisting that we called the game Project CARS 3 because that's what would sell. That decision was completely against my remit, completely against my advice, and something that I didn't agree with. So that's not a game I'm proud of. And that's not a get-out, either. I did my best to try to at least change the name. I did my best to try to position it such that it would be more of Forza Horizon as opposed to a Forza Motorsport. You know, we sometimes must accept these decisions because the investors are paying insane amounts of money to make these things happen."
EA killing off the planned PC4 which is said to return to its roots and being made as the ultimate hardcore sim..This might be a controversial take but I'm gutted to hear this is going to end and it's another series that won't be continuing for the primary reason that there are so few driving experiences that work well on a controller especially in the more simulation end of things.
I'm not just talking about controller support but actually feeling good to drive with one.
I still play PCars 3 on and off regularly because of this and it's great car and track selection.
I will definitely agree with this, they should have marketed it better and made it clear the difference in focus. A name change like Project Cars Subtitle Here would have helped too but I wonder if part of the Bamco contract was for a "3".
I'd been looking for it to go on sale for ages on PC as already had it on PS but it never really did and not really on key sites either. The current best price is from ShopTo.
Project Cars: Shift might have been a better indication as to what the game was meant to be.Ian Bell confirmed the original plan for Project CARS 3 was to be a spinoff, but that decision got overruled by investors:
![]()
Ian Bell on the Project Cars 3 flop: Codemasters ran over me
Bell claims that he had little input on the game despite trying to make investors see his vision.www.gamereactor.eu
Honestly I wish we were living in the alternate universe where the EA takeover happened a tiny bit quicker, so it was them publishing Project CARS 3 instead of Bandai Namco.Project Cars: Shift might have been a better indication as to what the game was meant to be.
Considering that Electronic Arts is the publisher here, I wouldn't expect discount 😒Hmm it's still listed for 90€ on steam (for the deluxe edition), usually there is a discount when publishers announce the end of sale. Maybe in a few days? 😐
It's Bandai Namco not EA. Still not expecting anything though.Considering that Electronic Arts is the publisher here, I wouldn't expect discount 😒
Yeah, i know these things dont happen automatically and take time to arrange but you'd think they would want to make a profit out of the last month on sale.One of the things that I like about PC3 is that it has full racing modifications for some cars which is something I wish they had in GT7. Also I can't figure out why this game is not on sale everywhere. I would think that the publisher would have a "going out of business" to move some units but I guess not in this case
It will be available on steam and other platforms until august 24th, after that it will be delisted.Is the DLC still available after de-list or is that totally it?