R34 VS GT3 VS 1993 NSX-R VS NSX Type S VS NSX Type S ZERO Vs 2002 NSX-R

  • Thread starter Thread starter rollazn
  • 23 comments
  • 2,145 views
Thanks i enjoyed it too. I would thought GT3 would done much better but those tracks favor the NSx, and Skylines so GT3 was a bit at a disadvantage and plus slower car mostly block the faster car. GT3 is fast no doubt it lay down the same time at nurburnring track in europe with a 7.56 same time as the 2004 corvette z06 and the 2002 NSX-R *same one who won from this race* I got the exact time for NSX-R with a 7.56.733 the Z06 and GT3 are in the 7 min 56 second zone but im not sure of the EXACT time.
 
after watching the video i once again feel that they werent driving the GT3 or the other non-japanese cars to there full extent.
just watch how he shifts the GT3 its bull**** compared to how they shift in the nsx. its also bull**** how he couldnt outaccelrate an R34... its like they were just crusin the track. they should put damon hill behind the gt3 around that track and see how good the gt3 really performs.
 
Originally posted by 1mic
after watching the video i once again feel that they werent driving the GT3 or the other non-japanese cars to there full extent.
just watch how he shifts the GT3 its bull**** compared to how they shift in the nsx. its also bull**** how he couldnt outaccelrate an R34... its like they were just crusin the track. they should put damon hill behind the gt3 around that track and see how good the gt3 really performs.
Click to expand...

Well, think of it like this. All the car beside GT3 are japanese car which is RHD which they drive almost everyday. They all have R34 and NSX numerous times on Best Motoring its not likely that they dont have a NSX or R34 in a battle. The GT3 is LHD which they are not use to at all!! Therefore with the shifting matter its like if you drive a manual stick right now on your car which is LHD try a RHD car do you think you can get use to it that quick? Even though they are professioal drivers its human instinct to drive like you always driven. If the driver was Keiichi or Gan San it would have been better because both Keiichi and Gan San has driven LHD cars alot before therefore making it a better race. I know the GT3 would have beaten all of it probably beside the NSX-R which will be a good race. dont forget the NSX-R posted the same time on a germany track Nurburinging as GT3 7:56 which is very impressive.

I am not making excuse i just see them as it is. you may disagree and i respect that but thats my point of view.
 
The GT3 definately wasn't driven to it's full potential. The same goes for the supercar battle with the Corvette.

Oh well, it's still good to see Japanese exotics being used the way they should be. :)
 
im glad u guys know that the gt3, NOW WAY IN HELL would have slower lap times then all those cars...
did u see the time attack times???
even if it was a '00 GT3 im positive it would burn most the cars there.
 
I dont underestimate the R34 i know what it is capable of and its my dream car my favorite car. a mclearn F1 or R34 and ill pick R34.

thats how i am :)
 
Go NSX!
honda.gif
 
Whoever drove that skyline needs some basic racing thoery! The inside line is normally faster than the outside line :banghead: And anyone know if the skyline was stock?
 
Yeah all the car are stock. Usually all the cars try to take the inside lane but for some reason i dont know. The skyline driver dont need any basic racing thoery they are all professioal drivers.
 
The skyline seems to be having trouble in that race suffering from traction or something, japanese words always come on when they show the GT-R. Im not japanese and i have no idea what wrong but on the take off the GT-R should have easily blow all of the NSX and GT3 out of its way on the start exspecailly when its 4WD and got pole position. There most be something extremely wrong with the GT-R. The NSX was right on its tail from the start. THAT GT-R had problems i know it did because on all the other race GT-R are always put in the back or near the back and always run to 2 or 1st with its 4wd launch vs those of RWD such as NSX or RX7 in other videos. Also the GT3 was not driven to its limit maybe because its LHD and the driver is not used to left hand drive cars but thats what i think. GT3 easily could have gotten 2nd place. NSX-R would probably most likely beat the GT3 on that track due to the favor of the NSX-R with alot of corners. reminder it did the exact same time as the GT3 in Ring track so they are really close in performance track wise but the GT3 can easily destory the NSX-R on 1/4 and on some track GT3 has an advantage such as Fisco and more, plus GT3 are great in corners.
 
indeed there are some weird stuff on that video, I know that NSXs are very capable track cars, but I think that the porsche is quite capable as well, but here it is SLOOWWWW as hell. also, the skyline isnt driven really well, the dude just takes corners too open. but cool vid, anyway.

Cano
 
The main Problem with the skyline GTR was the same as with all of them on the Tsukuba track, the tires didn't match, they are selected as standard for top end which provides alot of slip in low speed cornering. The particular car on that video was a 2001 Vspec 2, now you may think what? that can't be a vspec2, its not that slow, well the problems were the drivers driving them aren't as good as keichii and Gan and Nakaya all very good drivers, they werent as aggresive and the tyres weren't suited.
I've seen a Vpsec 1 do 1:04.57 around the same track, much faster than the 2002 NSX-R's 1:05.05 so theres no doubt the skyline would have won that race under different circumstances.
Also i've seen the same skyline score a full second per lap better than the 2002 NSX-R at Sugo.
 
Originally posted by skylinegtr243
The main Problem with the skyline GTR was the same as with all of them on the Tsukuba track, the tires didn't match, they are selected as standard for top end which provides alot of slip in low speed cornering. The particular car on that video was a 2001 Vspec 2, now you may think what? that can't be a vspec2, its not that slow, well the problems were the drivers driving them aren't as good as keichii and Gan and Nakaya all very good drivers, they werent as aggresive and the tyres weren't suited.
I've seen a Vpsec 1 do 1:04.57 around the same track, much faster than the 2002 NSX-R's 1:05.05 so theres no doubt the skyline would have won that race under different circumstances.
Also i've seen the same skyline score a full second per lap better than the 2002 NSX-R at Sugo.
Click to expand...

Really? Well at those small tight tracks the NSX-R might lose to the GT-R. Im a GT-R fan, but i will admit to saying that the NSX-R is a faster track car 80% of the time. The NSX-R is stripped weighing in 2800 LBS its very light. Great handling car no doubt. At curcuits like Frisco, Nurburining, etc... the NSX-R will beat the GT-R.

I got a 57min video of a GT-R Vspec vs NSX Type S vs Evo VI. The GT-R lost, NSX-S is too fast for it especially on a track like Frisco.

I love GT-R, give me a choice of GT-R or NSX-R, i will jump at the GT-R but the faster track wise is the NSX-R. At least IMO.
 
Ok... I know why the GT3 was slow. In the Drag Racing video The 911 GT3 was a road verison of some sort it said 360ps/7200rpm that isnt the one your thinking of. The NSX and GT-R both rip it up. Im very sure its the same GT3 in the video 360ps. Its not the new GT3 so now that i found that out, the GT3 didnt do too bad. Here is the dragging video if you guys havent seen it.


http://www.runeb.org/www_docs/Jexoticasite/soundandvideo/Best_Motoring-NSX-R_DragRaces1.mpg
 

Latest Posts

Back