Saab 9-4X, Cadillac SRX and Chevrolet Equinox Arrive

  • Thread starter Thread starter YSSMAN
  • 46 comments
  • 3,257 views

YSSMAN

Super-Cool Since 2013
Premium
Messages
21,286
United States
GR-MI-USA
Messages
YSSMAN
Messages
YSSMAN
x08cc_ca040.jpg


Autoblog
Following the introductions of the Chevrolet Volt and Opel Flextreme during 2007 auto show season, Cadillac is bringing forth a third design based on the E-Flex architecture. The Cadillac Provoq concept is intended to help give the brand an image of premium sustainability by updating the fuel cell E-Flex powertrain that was shown in a Chevy Volt at the Shanghai Motor Show last year. The Provoq is a luxury crossover design that's considerably larger than the Volt.

With updated Cadillac styling cues on a 180-inch long CUV body, it's stretched 10 inches longer than a Volt to allow comfortable seating for five passengers. The Provoq is built around GM's fifth-generation fuel cell stack combined with a 9kWh lithium ion battery pack. The electrical energy is used to power a 70kW AC motor driving the front wheels and a pair of 40kW hub motors at each rear corner. Like the other E-Flex vehicles, the Provoq has plug-in capability and the battery has enough capacity for about twenty miles of driving range. Combined with the 6kg of compressed hydrogen gas stored in its two tanks, the Provoq has a total range of about 300 miles. Clay Dean's Cadillac design team incorporated some of the aerodynamic lessons learned by the Volt crew, including thermostatically controlled slats in the grille to minimize drag when cooling air flow isn't needed.

x08cc_ca042.jpg


x08cc_ca043.jpg


x08cc_ca044.jpg


Holy cow, Batman! That one looks amazingly close to production. Rick Wagoner said the other day that the launch of the Volt is now a bit more "fluid" than before, so the whole plug-in thing may not be ready by the end of 2010, but it would be close... But this? This looks like you could walk into the dealer and drive it off tomorrow...

Here's a hint kids: I'd bet this is the new BRX "in disguise"
 
Yep. That interior is a straight lift out of a BRX. Most likely. It is. Look at the door panel window switches. Parts bin.


Do I see a hint of tail-fins?
 
Looks like it, yes... The lights are sticking out just enough to make it so.

I may be wrong, but this almost looks like its based on the Theta (Antara, VUE, etc) architecture...
 
I may be wrong, but this almost looks like its based on the Theta (Antara, VUE, etc) architecture...

Thats what I was thinking, also interesting those fins.

Personally I am not a fan of the Interior colours, reminds me too much of Korean interiors and something I would find in a utility vehicle..
 
Right foot is all they use in the US. :p

Kinda makes it easier, too, to make a manual version... they don't have to change the brake pedal.

Also helps for multi-car families, so you don't (after getting out of your other car, which is a stick) accidentally slam on the brakes while trying to depress a phantom clutch. (Guilty, your honor...) :lol:
 
Also helps for multi-car families, so you don't (after getting out of your other car, which is a stick) accidentally slam on the brakes while trying to depress a phantom clutch. (Guilty, your honor...) :lol:

I have done the phantom clutch a few times but never hit the brakes while doing it, damn the car must have gave a nice screech when you did that. :lol:
 
Looks pretty good inside and out. GM should definately make it. The
 
Unfinished thought, JCE? I guess it happens to the best of us. ^^
I...I'm split on this car. On one hand, I'd probably never drive it. electric traction motors = eww. It looks sharp, though, very good and easity producible.
 
The bastard child of a Saturn VUE and a CTS....although the roof line is identical to the Vibe's.
 
Unfinished thought, JCE? I guess it happens to the best of us. ^^
I...I'm split on this car. On one hand, I'd probably never drive it. electric traction motors = eww. It looks sharp, though, very good and easity producible.

:lol: Posting at 5am just might do that to someone. I don't even remember what I was going to say, :indiff:
 
Edginess aside, it looks pretty good. The interior is nicely done. The outside looks pretty well styled.

But still, the "cubist" look just isn't cutting it for me.
 
Meh, I'll roll its other sibling in here too:

The Saab 9-4X BioPower "Concept"

x08cc_sb004.jpg


Autoblog
GM has thrown the doors wide open on the Saab 9-4x BioPower concept after a Dutch media outlet spilled the beans earlier today. The 9-4x is badged as a concept, but the reality is that we will see new CUV probably sometime in 2009. The 9-4x and a new Cadillac that will likely look almost exactly like the Provoq Concept are expected to be based off an updated version of the Theta platform that's also used for the Saturn Vue. Unlike the Trailblazer-based Saab 9-7x, the 9-4x actually has some real Saab styling cues that tie it to the rest of the lineup as well as the heritage of the brand.

During the preview of the 9-4x, it was stated that Saab has tremendous support from the corporate overlords to be stewards of a niche brand. Saab has avoided the quirky aspects of its heritage while bringing forward elements like the shape of the forward sloping D-pillar, which reflects the contours of the classic Saabs like the 99 and 900. Similarly, the blacked out A-pillars recall the wrap-around windscreens of those classic Swedes and the Aero X concept. They've focused on the clean, crisp aspects of Scandinavian design while eliminating any fru-fru like cladding or imitation fender vents. When GM Design VP Brian Nesbitt talked about the 9-4x, he spoke of the design language being the look of Saab going forward.

x08cc_sb001_opt.jpg


One of the most important elements that Nesbitt highlighted was the face. Most of the great brands have a distinctive face that immediately identifies them as what they are. Think Mercedes-Benz, Audi, BMW and Rolls-Royce. Saab wants to do the same with the three-port grille as seen previously on the new 9-3 and Aero X concept. The ducts below the front bumper reflect some of Saab's aviation heritage invoking images of the air intakes on fighter jets.

x08cc_sb007_opt.jpg


On the inside, Saab has kept the usual cockpit design going with all the gauges and controls tilted toward the driver. While the flush mounted controls on the center stack look cool, clean and uncluttered, it looks like it has the potential to be really difficult to use while driving.

x08cc_sb002_opt.jpg


Mechanically the new cross-over retains the Haldex designed Cross-Wheel-Drive setup that's available on the 9-3. It's a torque vectoring system that works in conjunction with the stability control to send drive torque to wheels that have traction, but also biases the distribution to help the vehicle follow the course requested by the driver. The drive torque is provided by the latest version of Saab's BioPower engine.

Saab has been a major proponent of ethanol, particularly in its home base of Sweden where two thirds of all sales are now flex-fuel engines. It makes sense for Saab to promote ethanol since it can help enhance the performance of its predominantly turbocharged engines. The turbocharged four-cylinder engine in this new CUV is optimized for use with E85 and gets 300 hp from it's 2.0L displacement along with 295 lb-ft of torque from 2,600-5,100 rpm. Truly impressive numbers for such a small motor. The aluminum block engine also has direct injection and variable valve timing, all helping it get the most out of every drop of alcohol.

I really like this one too. I may even prefer it over the Cadillac to be honest...
 
Why didn't you post the real deal shots of the BRX?

2009-cadillac-brx-2.jpg


Just a Chevrolet Equinox in drag. A step back for Cadillac, if you ask me.
 
I see you've found consumerguideauto. You're familiar with the magic new program called "photoshop" right?
 
The 300 horse I4 is interesting, but both vehicles are uninteresting from my perspective. As always, a beautiful interior from Saab.


Speaking of Saab SUVs:

True fact: While I had a Saab 9-3, I was at Aristocrat Motors in Kansas City, waiting for them to take care of a couple things. (O2 sensors, and fix the fuel gauge) I milled around the showroom, and noticed a 9-7x. I played dumb with the saleswoman for two minutes, and then said, "You're forgetting that it's basically a Chevy Trailblazer." She replied "No, it's a Saab, sir." :ouch: She was impossible. After I overloaded her brain, I went to drool over the Cayman they had in the showroom.
 
I played dumb with the saleswoman for two minutes, and then said, "You're forgetting that it's basically a Chevy Trailblazer." She replied "No, it's a Saab, sir."
Well, it was the best Trailblazer, at least. Wouldn't do for it to come out and be upstaged by the departed Olds or Buick. One of the teachers at school owns one.
 
I won't argue with it being the best trailblazer. That's been established. It's the nicest inside, and the prettiest. It needs a Turbo. Then it might sell. Might
 
I won't argue with it being the best trailblazer. That's been established. It's the nicest inside, and the prettiest. It needs a Turbo. Then it might sell. Might
Actually, I think they might have succeeded in selling it by not making it in the first place. A gussied-up version of a gussied-up version of a gussied-up version of a car will only work if you have incredibly stupid customers. Saab hardly has customers, much less stupid ones. Now, if Mercedes started selling Lincoln Town Cars, then they might be able to make convincing arguments to enough buyers. But Saab? Not a chance.
 
Heres the thing though: I believe the 9-7X was the best-selling Saab in 2007. That would mean that it out-sold the 9-3 and the 9-5, which seems very odd indeed. I don't see that many of them, but even then, I don't see many Saabs in the first place.

It was a pretty good truck by the end, but unfortunately the GMT360 platform began to show its age, and now needs to be placed out to pasture...

But heres the bigger question:

Would you rather have Theta or Lambda chassis crossovers at your local Saab and Cadillac dealers? I know I choose the smaller "Theta +" (that means its luxurious) chassis...
 
Heres the thing though: I believe the 9-7X was the best-selling Saab in 2007. That would mean that it out-sold the 9-3 and the 9-5, which seems very odd indeed. I don't see that many of them, but even then, I don't see many Saabs in the first place.

The nearest Chevy dealer to my house sells Saabs, too, (quite opposite ends of the spectrum, eh?) and moves quite a few, mostly 9-3s, though. I haven't seen one 9-7X. In fact, I've seen more Saabaru 9-2Xs than 9-7Xs.

As for me, I'll take that Theta: If they can stuff that 2.0 Turbo in...

Otherwise, I'm taking the JAS Gripen for Saabs larger than a 9-5
 
Heres the thing though: I believe the 9-7X was the best-selling Saab in 2007. That would mean that it out-sold the 9-3 and the 9-5, which seems very odd indeed.
So, it sold more then cars that have never sold well? Stop the presses.
 

Latest Posts

Back