SEAT have ruined the ibiza cupra (apparently)

  • Thread starter Thread starter forza2.0
  • 45 comments
  • 3,456 views
Regarding the 1.4L's lack of capability...

I don't quite feel that's true. The answer would be in MORE compression, not less, and leaving the intake valve open a decent bit after BDC to lower the effective compression. The smaller chamber size would also shove exhaust gases out more effectively and to some degree spool the turbo quicker. Add in the fact that the Twincharger system is already in place and you have a hell of a powerplant.

280hp is feasible reliably and if a good intercooling solution can be found it won't have any real issues.
 
Seat is supposed to be cheaper, not-quite-as-good-as VW.
No, that would be Skoda. Seat is the budget-version of Audi. Sporty, but lacking a bit in refinement (especially the interior). I've owned the first model Léon (this one even had the same interior as the Audi A3, though made of less quality materials) and the former model Cordoba (an Ibiza with a trunk ;)) and they're pretty decent cars considering the price.
 
Seat is supposed to be cheaper, not-quite-as-good-as VW.
No. Seat is supposed to be "blow-the-boredom-out-of-the-VW-range-and-make-a-sportier-more-powerful-version-with-better-looks". It seems that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but I don't see how an Altea or a Leon looks worse than a Golf or a Passat. VW decelerates them a bit not to be overtaken, because they offer the same technology with more grunt in a more beautiful shell for less.
 
Fair enough, but putting things into perspective considering they are bottom of the range models I would say all of the reviews are positive ones, except barring the Evo one but that is so heavily geared towards high performance vehicles I never take anymore notice of what they write tbh as you already know what they will say and what their verdict will be before even open the magazine.

I disagree with you on this. Evo is geared towards fun vehicles - they have tested cars with remarkably little performance (certainly less than a 180bhp Ibiza is capable of) and given them very high ratings. The Ford SportKa, Fiat Panda 100HP and basic first gen BMW MINI Cooper come to mind, with 4.5 stars each out of five. And yet none of these are particularly "high performance".

That not many SEATs score more than 3.5 stars out of five is mainly because they do concentrate on power more than other important factors like balance, steering precision and plain simple fun.

Yes that is true but then there are currently two dealers that are real life enthusiasts themselves and therefore are on the SEAT forums giving us inside info on the new models based on their meetings with SEAT UK.

In future then it'd be helpful if you either linked to the forum or took one of the dealers' quotes wholesale and posted it here, so it doesn't look so much like heresay.

For the 2nd top of the range version 180hp is loads. The thing with the cupra range is that they were never the class leaders in the handling department, but what made up for it was the powerful engines and the superb brakes. Therefore its what us SEAT fans have come to love about SEAT, the fact that when it comes to power the range is usually at the forefront compared to the competition... But anyway it looks like the cupra (fr) is gonna be a performance bargain, and the bocanegra is gonna blow the socks off the competition!

I agree that SEAT offer brilliant power for the money, and I have to say that if I were in the market for a 200bhp+ hot hatch the Leon Cupra would be right up there for me (I think it looks fantastic for a start), but I always feel a little disappointed when a magazine reviews them and say that despite the extra power versus their competitiors, they never quite seem competitive enough handling-wise. I'd prefer them to spend a little less on tuning their engines and a little more on tuning their chassis.

As for the Bocanegra, I'll await reviews with interest. It wouldn't surprise me if there were more than just a few cars ahead of it in the rankings when magazines group test it.
 
It looks decent-ish - I don't like the Subaruish front, or the fugly rear diffusor, but the overall package looks... distinctly average.

I dont grow up and dont call people idiots for no good reason.

I heart out of context quotes.

Those reviews were all on like the 1.4 SE with the shopping trolley mumsy suspension. The german reviews rate it highly giving it the praise that it deserves, dont know why some english publications expect the bottom of the range shopping trolley models to handle like a hothatch? :dunce:

Perhaps because it's called "SportCoupe"? They trash the other half-sporty cars just as much.

Plus, German magazines are to be trusted around VAG products like American publications around a Corvette-Porsche or CTS-M5-AMG-RS comparison (and vice versa).
 
ibiza cupra.. ruined? was there something to ruin? The VW versions look better by a mile, and they probably have better handling too. Seat is supposed to be cheaper, not-quite-as-good-as VW. It's about on par with Skoda, which means that they'll never be as good as VW, despite having more power or dramatic looks.

woah, talk about giving an opinion without any real knowledge. All of that is completely wrong!

So the polo GTI is better looking than the cupra. Now looks are subjective, but many would say the polo GTI is rather bland and boring. Also the MK4 Ibiza Cupra runs ring around the Polo GTI, it has a more powerful engine, better suspension and much much better brakes, seeing as its fitte with 4 pot ap racing brake setup. The only thing the polo gti has over the cupra is better quality interior materials. The Polo GTI is a copy of the MK4 Ibiza FR, yet with a huge price premium. No wonder there are more Ibiza FR's and Cupra's on the road than the polo GTI.

The same also goes for the Leon Cupras, past and present, same chassis as the Golf GTI, but with better brakes, quite alot more power, and uprated suspension. Dont forget that audi developed the SEAT cupra's engine for them, hence why it is exactly the same as the Audi S3 engine but slightly downrated.

Also on the new ibiza, Audi and SEAT developed the chassis together, only thing is though that is when audi use the chassis for their A1 it will have fully independant rear suspension, so it can go mini cooper S hunting.

So in reality SEAT is the , not quite as refined VW, but faster and cheaper alternative for enthusiasts who dont care too much about a upmarket premium interior.

I agree that SEAT offer brilliant power for the money, and I have to say that if I were in the market for a 200bhp+ hot hatch the Leon Cupra would be right up there for me (I think it looks fantastic for a start), but I always feel a little disappointed when a magazine reviews them and say that despite the extra power versus their competitiors, they never quite seem competitive enough handling-wise. I'd prefer them to spend a little less on tuning their engines and a little more on tuning their chassis.

Id say this is true for the MK1 Leon Cupra, and the MK4 Ibiza cupra, but the MK2 Leon Cupra is extremely capable and one of the most competent hot hatches on the market, only car I can think of in its segment that handles better is the megane sport R26.

As for the Bocanegra, I'll await reviews with interest. It wouldn't surprise me if there were more than just a few cars ahead of it in the rankings when magazines group test it.

So will I, SEAT head honchos, (the majority of whom are now from audi) keep banging on about how the new chassis was designed to make sure the ibiza this time round is at the top or near the top of its class, and in some group reviews where the 5 door mk5 ibiza was compared to the new corsa and clio, the handling on the ibiza is apparently better than the corsa and up there with the clio. I hope the handling will match the vehicles power, and with audi sending over alot of their bosses to SEAT im pretty optimistic!

Perhaps because it's called "SportCoupe"? They trash the other half-sporty cars just as much.

Exactly my point, they never put things into perspective, who is gonna buy a 1.4 ibiza, take it to a race track and then be disapointed when it doesnt set the world on fire? For what it was designed for, going to and from the shops etc its great, the biggest in its class whilst still shedding weight over the previous model whilst the chassis is alot stiffer at teh same time.

Oh and sports coupe is just a fancy name for saying 3 door hatchback. Its a bit like the vauxhall astra sports hatch.

Plus, German magazines are to be trusted around VAG products like American publications around a Corvette-Porsche or CTS-M5-AMG-RS comparison (and vice versa).

Well one of the german magazines actually placed the SEAT leon ahead of the golf and audi's A3, and one mag gave it car of the year.

In future then it'd be helpful if you either linked to the forum or took one of the dealers' quotes wholesale and posted it here, so it doesn't look so much like heresay.

Gary@Cookies (seat dealership):

I had lunch with the head of SEAT Product (Small cars) and he said categorically that it would be the 1.4 TSi twin charged 170BHP version as fitted in the Golf, I made a simple typo. I asked him about the problems we've all heard of with that twin charged engine and he reckons all the problems have been sorted, I suppose time will tell. He also said the diesels wouldn't be here this year as they're not going to take the 1.9 in its current form.
 
Last edited:
I had lunch with the head of SEAT Product (Small cars) and he said categorically that it would be the 1.4 TSi twin charged 170BHP version as fitted in the Golf, I made a simple typo. I asked him about the problems we've all heard of with that twin charged engine and he reckons all the problems have been sorted, I suppose time will tell. He also said the diesels wouldn't be here this year as they're not going to take the 1.9 in its current form.

I find it quite questionable.

You are an idiot, how else do you judge cars, if not on looks speed, and its chassis capabilities, especially when you had high hopes, and then it appears that the old cupra, albeit being a bit heavier will be a better performer due to better brakes and a more tuneable engine.

And if im a idiot then I take it so are all the other disapointed guys over on the SEAT forums.

You like it, I dont grow up and dont call people idiots for no good reason. Kids.

Oh gosh, where to start.
I wasn't talking about judging how the car looks, I was talking about judging the car based on how a concept looks. I never mentioned chassis capabilities or speed, since no-one has tested the concept or FR.

The crux of the issue is that you didn't like it because it didn't look like a SEAT concept, and wasn't more powerful than it's predecessor.
Oh, and hypocrite much? I love how you call me a kid, insinuating that you're more grown up than I am. Saying it will not make it so.
 
Last edited:
I find it quite questionable.

Me too. I don't trust a Gary that works in a place called Cookies.

Especially when he, the SEAT representative, buys their greatest fanboy a lunch, and promises him that their engine-troubles have been resolved, and that if he ever needs a bit of extra cash, he should make another thread on GTPlanet.

woah, talk about giving an opinion without any real knowledge. All of that is completely wrong!

*senseless bull*

So in reality SEAT is the , not quite as refined VW, but faster and cheaper alternative for enthusiasts who dont care too much about a upmarket premium interior.

So in the end, you agree that a SEAT is a VW with slightly lower-grade materials and a cheaper pricetag? :rolleyes:

and with audi sending over alot of their bosses to SEAT im pretty optimistic!

Do they also have a fountain of youth? The ultimate answer to the ultimate question? Or better yet, do they have the ultimate question?
Audi's hatches haven't been stellar, and bosses have nothing to do with the car. If they sent over the Audi engineers - or better yet, why not those from the motorsports departments? In the "my engineer has a bigger diploma than yours" fight, Renault is still ahead, mind you.

who is gonna buy a 1.4 ibiza, take it to a race track and then be disapointed when it doesnt set the world on fire?

So, you say nobody's going to buy the 1.4l TSI car? :p

Well one of the german magazines actually placed the SEAT leon ahead of the golf and audi's A3, and one mag gave it car of the year.

So? Several gave the Fiat 500 that same honour - it was even European car of the year. Comparisons are often determined on silly stuff. In shared models, it's even more random - one reviewer will give the price more weight, the other will insist that the leather interior makes it the best car ever. In a roadtest performed by a local magazine between the (then current) Citroen C5, Ford Mondeo, Peugeot 406 and the matching Opel, the Mondeo trumped them in almost every department, but the C5 won because despite being runner-up, it was more comfortable.
 
Staying out of the brewing (and quite obviously pre-ordained... :lol: ) flame-wars... I'd like to comment on power:

280 isn't feasible, not without a lot of fine-tuning and some bottom end rebuilding... 10:1 is already high for a turbo engine (though it's common these days)... and as shown in the specs, the 1.4 TFSI already requires direct injection and high octane to run well... anything over 220 bhp may well require more octane or, at the very least, a slight decrease in compression (9:1 or 9.5:1 might work... ) to run reliably. Take note... reliably. While it is possible for tuners to get 200 hp per liter out of high compression motors, how long the block stays in one piece is a very relevant question.

280 out of 1.4 liters is roughly equivalent to 400 hp out of a Golf or 500 hp out of the Focus ST... numbers that you don't commonly see without a bottom-end rebuild.... either before or after you hit those numbers. Not saying it's impossible, but it's not something I'd chose to do without a lot of research, internal work and prayer. :lol:
 
@Danachronism & Forza 2.0

Both of you calm down and refrain from the insults or infractions will be handed out, and Forza you don't have any room to take any more of those.

This is the ONLY warning you will get gents.

On a side note I do not want to see anymore opinion or speculation posted as fact here, unless you have an independently verifiable source to back up a claim don't post it as a fact.


Scaff
 
Me too. I don't trust a Gary that works in a place called Cookies.

Especially when he, the SEAT representative, buys their greatest fanboy a lunch, and promises him that their engine-troubles have been resolved, and that if he ever needs a bit of extra cash, he should make another thread on GTPlanet.

In fairness to Forza, I asked him to quote wholesale from the SEAT forum. I expect the person having lunch with the head of SEAT small cars was the dealer himself, and Forza has posted the dealer's forum post.

Though, as Scaff says above, it's still not a particularly reliable source, as third-hand information from an informal discussion.
 
Plus, German magazines are to be trusted around VAG products like American publications around a Corvette-Porsche or CTS-M5-AMG-RS comparison (and vice versa).
The German cars usually win tests in both countries. :eek:
 
I think, mechanically, I'm in love with this car!

Identical engine power to the old one, with smaller displacement? That just means that this car isn't marching upmarket as many car inevitably do, that it isn't losing its soul and small size-class. But, since it's not a carry-over engine, this actually means we're getting a more advanced engine in the car, and a smaller engine should be lighter as well!

And 990kg :eek: A Civic EK9 is more than that! That's bloody fantastic, and I can only imagine what a new, lightweight car must do in the corners!

Unfortunately, all this pace-related advancement magnifies the car's huge, hideous flaw: The disgusting back end.

Fix. it. now.

Then, I'll be in love, from a distance (Damn you, American car market, Damn You!!).
 
Last edited:
I almost fell off my chair.

spadseatibiza.jpg
 
SEAT isn't French...
 
Back