Personally, I would have been more impressed if Shelby took the GT500, added the eco boost technology to the V8, while at the same time throw in an hybrid power train that can add to the gas power. Have the V8 churn out 750-800 horses and an extra 150-200 HP from the hybrid power. That way getting 1000 horses is not as much of a hassle on the engine, and Ford can get added street cred for the eco boost and hybrid tech.
All wishful thinking of course.
Please don't add the eco-boom to my Mustang. Thanks.
Because you know, these things called drag radials & proper throttle control would definitely help solve that.A 200 mph Mustang! Oh wait, didn't they already do that? I think so. I don't think 1000 horsepower going to only the rear wheels is a very efficient idea. Four digit power shoved aft is just going to translate into a massive cloud of smoke. It could work on an AWD car, but an FR car with that much power will likely have too much wheelspin.
Leonidae@MFTI don't think that even street legal drag radials can handle that amount of power without wheelspin.
There are Supras here in Texas pushing 1,200whp & driven weekly. I have no doubt this 1,000hp GT500 can do the same.Leonidae@MFTI don't think that even street legal drag radials can handle that amount of power without wheelspin.
There are Supras here in Texas pushing 1,200whp & driven weekly. I have no doubt this 1,000hp GT500 can do the same.
Again, proper tires & a driver who can manage the throttle properly could drive one of these without wheel spin.
It doesn't matter as you originally said that street legal radials may not be to handle that kind of power when in reality, they can, and secondly, there have been numerous GT500s in the range of this Shelby that have been street driven.Uh huh.. But do those Supras have LRA?
Before the '11 Mustangs, yeah. Now-a-days, 300hp from the factory is enough to put most cars in the rear view mirror.I would have at least called it the GT 1000 not just 1000. Around here if you have a 6 cylinder in your muscle car you get laughed at.
Before the '11 Mustangs, yeah. Now-a-days, 300hp from the factory is enough to put most cars in the rear view mirror.
McLarenBefore the '11 Mustangs, yeah. Now-a-days, 300hp from the factory is enough to put most cars in the rear view mirror.
A 200 mph Mustang! Oh wait, didn't they already do that? I think so. I don't think 1000 horsepower going to only the rear wheels is a very efficient idea. Four digit power shoved aft is just going to translate into a massive cloud of smoke. It could work on an AWD car, but an FR car with that much power will likely have too much wheelspin.
I still don't get it. How a car sells on 1,000 hp alone confuses me. I'm not a Mustang guy, so maybe the magic is lost on me, but I can't get excited over this, because from my point of view there are many ways to achieve the same result with more on the side.
However this car does show one thing very clearly. Road car are not "maxxed out". When an automaker gives you 600 hp, it's not because that's all they could do. It should be obvious quite frankly, but I've seen enough comments that make it seem otherwise.
We got quite a few cars like that here in DFW.Well that looks pretty pedestrian. I mean no one's gonna take a Shelby Mustang as a sleeper, but on a dark street in a dark night you wouldn't know that thing has a thousand horses underhood.
Well that looks pretty pedestrian. I mean no one's gonna take a Shelby Mustang as a sleeper, but on a dark street in a dark night you wouldn't know that thing has a thousand horses underhood.
I would have at least called it the GT 1000 not just 1000. Around here if you have a 6 cylinder in your muscle car you get laughed at.
If you put a six cylinder in a muscle car you should be laughed at...just sayin'. Of course, I grew up in the 60's/70's when you got laughed at if you had less than 400 cubes and now drive a V-12 so what do I know? By the way, that is one fine Mustang!