What am I supposed to be in denial about.
I didn't say specifically you... I tend not to pay attention to user names very much so if I haven't had a discussion with you in the last day or two there is a good chance I don't recall exactly what your previous posts are. However usually if I have responded to something you said that I feell is illogical or irrational I will have explained why there.
I cannot remember reading one positive post from you about GT5.
You aren't the only one to make that mistake. I have said quite a few positive things about GT5, features I was looking forward too, things that were pleasant surprises. But I don't go on for very long about them becuase... well honestly I kind of expect GT5 to be a top performer and to set the bar in a lot of places. I mean do you go into a 5 star restaraunt and rave about how the napkins were clean, the silver was polished and no one spilled hot soup on you? No... the positives may be mentioned, but just because I don't go on about them doesn't mean I don't appreciate them.
I mean I LOVE premium cars and how detailed and sexy they look, but then... that's what I have been expecting for 5 years... so I may mention it here and there but I don't go on for pages about it or anything. But when things don't live up to expectations I bring those up to and as they tend to get more rsponses and often more illogical and irrational responses, they tend to be the ones I spend more time with.
In short I have said positive things, but people often decide I am only here to be negative and don't notice or remember them. I have pointed this out few times before to others who also said I am never positive... but ironically I think those posts get skimmed over too.
Now obviously your entitled to your opinion but in my opinion you are intentionally negative just so you get a reaction, hence the troll comment I made earlier.
Opinions are opinions and we all got em... but when opinions are stated as fact and when arguments are provided and aren't rational or logical, I point that out. That's unpleasant for some people and their defenses often go up and the first response is I must be a troll.
Look at this thread:
I agree it's up to PD whether they want to release a demo or not. I don't think they are under any obligation to put on on PSN and honestly I can think of a few reason maybe why they wouldn't want to.
However while I may agree on the point with some poeple, when they come along with irrational and illogical arguments to back up why I call them out on it.
Only new or bad games need a demo? Really? No I don't think so... any game can benefit from a demo.
People only want a demo to pick it apart and bash it? Well their is already a publically available demo widespread and people already have access to it. It's not like those who want to pick apart GT5 don't already have an avenue to do so so that argument makes no sense.
There is no time to make a demo? There is a demo already made... that's holds no water either.
I am not being negative, I am just pointing out the obvious flawed logic. Hoowever many people are so wrapped up in the which hunt of looking for trolls they fail to see that and simply assume I must be being negative and trollish, however if you are open and honest iwth your evaluation, I don't think you can find fault with the points I have made.
So, if I am only making valid points, but am being lambasted for it... who does that then make the real trolls?
as 4 out of the 5 stores I visit the PS3 demo have controllers that don't work:tdown:. So I'd have to find a game on the xBox
or Wii
. So yes the demo should be on PSN. I find it funny when you ask about them not working and they just say we've fixed it but it broke again:tdown:.
