Sony in serious trouble?

  • Thread starter Thread starter magburner
  • 98 comments
  • 5,484 views

magburner

Premium
Messages
2,693
Wales
The Empire State
Messages
magburner, GTP_madgurner, showtime_uk
Maybe your unaware of it, but I certainly am not, Sony is in serious trouble!

For starters, where is the Christmas ad campaign? Here in the UK, it is non-existent. 99% of the adverts on TV for games, are fro the 360, with only LBP being offered by Sony. What gives?

On top of that, Sony have become masters at delaying everything! Home is a classic example of this. I cannot understand how it has took them so long to release the damn thing. Don't get me wrong, I love it (I brought a summer house the other day btw), I just can't understand how it has took so long to get to the stage it is at now.

Then there is the fall update for GT5:P, where the hell is it? Fall has gone, winter is here, and spring is on the way, and still no sign of the much hyped update. Surely, there must be a video out there, something showing the state of play regarding where PD are at, or is it still just vapourware?

Sony need to get their hands from down their pants, and start delivering some killer content, and fast! The war is being lost to the tin cans, and I for one am not in the slightest bit happy about it. I didn't stump up 425 clams to be led on a merry dance like this! I'm tired of the suggestive (and often misleading) comments, false hopes, and down right BS, all I want is what has been promised, and now!

Sony have had two years to deliver... nothing! I'll get hold of MGS4 sooner or later, LBP doesn't interest me, and as for the rest of the back catalogue, well, its hardly in the same league as what Microsoft has to offer. I seriously thought this year would be the year of the PS3, sadly though, its the year that never was. I'm trying my hardest to be optomistc about future game releases, but knowing Sony's eagerness to keep me hanging on like a soft one, I don't hold out much hope. What do you guys think?
 
Classic Sony always late at delivering but always well worth it :) same can be said for PD with their Gran Turismo series :sly:.

Long live SONY .
 
In the end Sony will win.

That's what I'm worried about - the way things are shaping up, it will be the end!

I want Sony to win, that's why I brought my console at launch. Looking back though, I could of easily waited until now to buy the PS3, and done away with the last two tormented years, and saved my myself £150.

This next year has to be the year, it just has to be! 👍
 
Who cares about Sony? We just lost a far more important company: Free Radical Design! I'm surprised no one has even mentioned it here (from what I can see). It reminds me of back when Westwood Studios was shut down...and Bullfrog, such sad days. I was waiting with anticipation of TimeSplitters 4.

I have no doubts that Sony will be going for a long time in future, judging by Nintendo and Sega's history, Sony can last one more commercially unsuccessful console before they are in trouble or rather they give up.

If I was going to say one thing about the PS3: it was doomed to failure from the start, Sony raising the royalties + using unusual architecture + the competitors releasing earlier and cheaper meant I wasn't expecting anything spectacular from the get go.
Its ironic because the reason the PS1 was so successful was because it had pretty easy architecture and the royalties were relatively low compared to other the competitors, meaning it was crazy cheap and easy to produce games for the system and it was highly popular. I don't get why Sony have decided to do the opposite for the PS3.

On top of that, Sony have become masters at delaying everything! Home is a classic example of this. I cannot understand how it has took them so long to release the damn thing. Don't get me wrong, I love it (I brought a summer house the other day btw), I just can't understand how it has took so long to get to the stage it is at now.

I'm guessing they have a small development team on it and when they annouced it they really had done no work at the time beyond concepts.

I personally cannot understand why anyone would even think about spending money in Home......but I'm not going to get into that. I don't blame Sony for taking advantage though.
 
Have you missed the PSP ads?

PSP ads don't sell PS3s, and yes, I have missed them!

Its like Microsoft has brought up every single advertising right out there. Apart from their own advertising, the 360 is the poster boy for all other retailers. I have not seen a single retailer (other than Sony) air an advert with the PS3 in it!

erm we got that?

Erm... I was talking about the one with the supposed crash damage physics, or was that only me that heard that one?

@Arduis: I agree with you. Its not just the increased royalty rights, its the actual price of the machine too. You can buy (almost) two 360's for the price of one PS3. Maybe the PS3 was a generation too soon, because I feel that it is a little ahead of its time. Don't get me wrong, the PS3 is a marvel of modern design, but it is just too expensive, and hard to code for. On top of that the promises of the power of the CBE have yet to be realised (if they ever will be).
 
I am not a game programmer, but the PS3 hardware looks far more conventional than the PS2 ever did: it took the likes of Polyphony Digital to squeeze out a pretty game with the PS2's weird architecture. The hardware was compromised though: the Cell had trouble accessing the graphics chip's pool of RAM quickly. We're also not getting the badly needed FSAA that the Xbox can achieve for cheap. Jaggies!

I don't think they should have dropped backwards compatibility to sell more PS2s. Backwards compatibility was a selling point of the PS3! I wish I could retire my PS2! They could scrap the card reader too, but I could really use two more USB ports. They cost cut the thing too early.

Sony's selection of games really didn't appeal to me: I got the feeling they were trying to sell it as the centre of entertainment, not gaming. GT5 was their crowning jewel for me, but I really couldn't wait until it shipped. How else was I supposed to get my GT racing fix with the G25 without fiddling? :sly:

I remember reading about high development costs for developers on the PS3 too compared to the other platforms.
 
Erm... I was talking about the one with the supposed crash damage physics, or was that only me that heard that one?

.

As far as i'm aware, we were never promised a 'big fall update' which was to include damage. I think it's a case of one person speculating about it and it leading to a huge urban myth.

Does anybody have a link to an official announcement by PD that there was to be a 'big fall update' which was going to include damage and private rooms etc?
 
Maybe your unaware of it, but I certainly am not, Sony is in serious trouble!

For starters, where is the Christmas ad campaign? Here in the UK, it is non-existent. 99% of the adverts on TV for games, are fro the 360, with only LBP being offered by Sony. What gives?

On top of that, Sony have become masters at delaying everything! Home is a classic example of this. I cannot understand how it has took them so long to release the damn thing. Don't get me wrong, I love it (I brought a summer house the other day btw), I just can't understand how it has took so long to get to the stage it is at now.

Then there is the fall update for GT5:P, where the hell is it? Fall has gone, winter is here, and spring is on the way, and still no sign of the much hyped update. Surely, there must be a video out there, something showing the state of play regarding where PD are at, or is it still just vapourware?

Sony need to get their hands from down their pants, and start delivering some killer content, and fast! The war is being lost to the tin cans, and I for one am not in the slightest bit happy about it. I didn't stump up 425 clams to be led on a merry dance like this! I'm tired of the suggestive (and often misleading) comments, false hopes, and down right BS, all I want is what has been promised, and now!

Sony have had two years to deliver... nothing! I'll get hold of MGS4 sooner or later, LBP doesn't interest me, and as for the rest of the back catalogue, well, its hardly in the same league as what Microsoft has to offer. I seriously thought this year would be the year of the PS3, sadly though, its the year that never was. I'm trying my hardest to be optomistc about future game releases, but knowing Sony's eagerness to keep me hanging on like a soft one, I don't hold out much hope. What do you guys think?

Well I guess it doesn't help either when you can get an Xbox 360 for $250 and can *still* only get a PS3 for $700 - which won't play PS2 games. There is really not much reason for a person looking to buy a christmas present for a kid or a gamer to get the PS3 when the 360 does the same job for so much less
 
Well I guess it doesn't help either when you can get an Xbox 360 for $250 and can *still* only get a PS3 for $700 - which won't play PS2 games. There is really not much reason for a person looking to buy a christmas present for a kid or a gamer to get the PS3 when the 360 does the same job for so much less

Apart from you don't get gt on xbox and you have to pay to play online. Lol.
 
Serious GAMERS do not need TV adds to make them buy the games. We have INTERNETZ for this..

No wonder there are more casual gamers on xbox360. Just play Halo 3 online and you will find one of the most annoying people on earth. Play SOCOM and you will find some of the most hardcore players on earth.
 
I'm more than happy with 6 titles i bought since october. If you are not happy with the games thats not Sony's fault or problem.

None of the listed concerns for Sony show any signs of being any kind of trouble.
 
Last edited:
Cause Sony winning the Blu-ray -v- HD-DVD wasn't a huge deal?

I don't really think the blu-ray deal was a big thing. Downloads are the future, netflix will take over, and look who has that. I bet blu-ray lasts maybe 2 more years, and then it will be a novelty item. Why would anyone pay 30$ to own a blu-ray disk, when they can download an hd movie for 6$. Right now downloads are only 720p, but I'm sure that in a few years it will jump to 1080p.
 
I think small flash cards will be the last physical media iteration before downloads take over completely. Best Buy (and other major retailers) are already selling music albums on the same type of flash memory cards that are typically used for digital cameras. Who wants to carry around CDs, DVDs, or Blu-ray discs when you can carry around flash cards smaller than your credit card? Granted, it will be some time still before flash cards have the capacity and a low enough cost to compete directly with Blu-ray, and the music selection is not that wide yet, but this is definitely the way I see media heading. Perhaps Sony did too, which is why they included it on the first PS3 models, at least.
 
I would hardly call selling 15 million PS3's a failure. I have several games sitting over here that I just love to play, Home Beta is rolled out which provides even more fun with my friends. I have had more fun with my PS3 so far than I had with the previous Xbox or PC.

I really don't understand why someone would buy a console based on a company's promises. You should judge the PS3 for what it has today, not for what it might (or might not) get in the future. Everybody knows what company's promises are worth. Not much. ;)

That said, Microsoft is giving them a hard time, especially this Christmas. The cheapest version of the Xbox 360 is a bargain that's almost too good to be true. Sony needs to cut prices on the PS3 to be competitive, because parents and grandparents buying presents don't look at specs, they look at the price.

But I hardly think it's 'the end' for Sony or the PS3. All they need to do is to drop prices a bit. And their (and other companies) release schedules are a direct result of the complexity of the PS3 architecture. They should invest more to help other companies develop titles.

About the communications surrounding GT5P you are absolutely right. KY is saying one thing in one interview and the exact opposite in another. This is only fuel for (false) rumors and does not help at all. Personally, I suspect they will not introduce private rooms until Home is out of Beta (to prevent beta-issues rubbing off on PD), or they might have dropped GT5P completely to work on the full GT5 so we may see it earlier than expected. :)
 
PSP ads don't sell PS3s, and yes, I have missed them!

Its like Microsoft has brought up every single advertising right out there. Apart from their own advertising, the 360 is the poster boy for all other retailers. I have not seen a single retailer (other than Sony) air an advert with the PS3 in it!

ps3's isn't the only thing sony makes,just because they aren't advertising 1 product doesn't mean they are in trouble.

there was also that sony hd james bond advert which was on every second advert.
 
Last edited:
there was also that sony hd james bond advert which was on every second advert.

I remember that advert, it was pretty awesome, but it had little to do with the PS3.

In fact, if my memory server me correctly, I have seen umpteen adverts for Quantum of Solice on the 360, but not a single one on the PS3! Hows that for not caring about your own products!
 
I remember that advert, it was pretty awesome, but it had little to do with the PS3.

In fact, if my memory server me correctly, I have seen umpteen adverts for Quantum of Solice on the 360, but not a single one on the PS3! Hows that for not caring about your own products!

I still don't see how you can claim sony are in trouble just because they aren't advertising one product whereas they are still constantly advertising others.
 
I don't really think the blu-ray deal was a big thing. Downloads are the future, netflix will take over, and look who has that. I bet blu-ray lasts maybe 2 more years, and then it will be a novelty item. Why would anyone pay 30$ to own a blu-ray disk, when they can download an hd movie for 6$. Right now downloads are only 720p, but I'm sure that in a few years it will jump to 1080p.

a. Dvd's used to cost 30-40 dollars when vhs was less than half price
b. If you look at a few of even 1st world countries. Not many support the internet required to have hd downloads sustainable. Many countries still have caps which you would struggle with just using youtube a few times a month. The infrastructure is simply not there to support the speed needed. Heck a lot of people still use dial up on Australia even which in my opinion isn't even suitable for web browsing.
c. People like physical media. Doubt anything will be able to truly replace physical media.


So really sure download movies are the future. but not for a lot more years than 2 (globally at least)

Anyhow I don't understand why this thread even exists. All it is doing is kicking up a fuss that doesn't exist and will probably just lead to a flame war.
 
I would not worry too much about Sony not advertising the PS3 on TV. Alls Microsoft have done is saturated the market in advertising a machine that will probably be obsolete this time next year. The PS3 is set to take over once the 360 is out of the way. Everyone goes on about how cheap the 360 is, but look at what you don't get with it. As far as price goes you get what you pay for, and the PS3 to me was well worth the money. You have everything you need.

Look at it this way when the PS3 came out, you would struggle to find a Blu-Ray player for less, so you got a PS3 with the player and all the other things chucked in. Bargin in the end of the day.

Yes feet have been dragged when it comes to games, but I believe acts will be got together eventually.
 
Bloody hell people can whinge. I can't remember the last time we had a video game commercial in Australia. From distant memory, it was GTA San Andreas with the Welcome to the jungle theme. When the Glenn Seton Falcon was in gt3 'huge deal at the time' we had gt3 ads but that was it. You know what... People still buy these games......
 
Sony have had two years to deliver... nothing! I'll get hold of MGS4 sooner or later, LBP doesn't interest me, and as for the rest of the back catalogue, well, its hardly in the same league as what Microsoft has to offer. I seriously thought this year would be the year of the PS3, sadly though, its the year that never was. I'm trying my hardest to be optomistc about future game releases, but knowing Sony's eagerness to keep me hanging on like a soft one, I don't hold out much hope. What do you guys think?

Just because you don't care for the games doesn't mean there aren't good games out there. I just had this same conversation the other day with a few other members. I agree that the 360 has more games I am interested in but that isn't to say the PS3 has bad games. They sell obviously and people buy them.

Oh and why would Sony advertise the PS3 when they can advertise things like HDTV's that probably net them more profit. The PS3 seems like it would be an add-on purchase for a lot of people buying TV's as well. I know my local Best Buy has a PS3 set up showcasing Blu-Ray. Seriously if you were buying a $2,500 TV and saw that you probably would pick one up, albeit a basic model.

People complain all the time about this it seems and they always fail to realise both Microsoft and Sony make a ton of other products. I mean do you think MS makes more on selling you the overpriced-but-you-have-to-have Office or Halo?
 
We have PS3 adverts quite often over here (mainly the new Motorstorm, Buzz and Singstar). Also you can notice that Blue-ray is starting to take over. For example if a new film is out they say "Now on Blue-ray disc!" instead of "Now on DVD!".
 
Maybe your unaware of it, but I certainly am not, Sony is in serious trouble!
As are most large companies right now, especially ones like Sony that have the majority of their holdings in financial institutions. :eek:

This is why I own stock in Microsoft and not Sony.

On top of that, Sony have become masters at delaying everything! Home is a classic example of this. I cannot understand how it has took them so long to release the damn thing. Don't get me wrong, I love it (I brought a summer house the other day btw), I just can't understand how it has took so long to get to the stage it is at now.
I'm guessing by your response you are not a programmer or involved in the development of software.

My knowledge in these areas is very limited, and yet it didn't take me more than an hour using Home, playing with the incredibly life-like avatar creator tool, and roaming around the spaces and playing with the games to realize this was a massive undertaking!

Not just the program itself, but trying to make it so everyone around the world can use it and connect with each other in this virtual world. In many ways it appears far more advanced then Second Life, which reportedly took Linden Research several years to develop.

If anything Sony is in serious trouble because they are giving so much away for free:


Unless you are into virtual real estate, interior decorating and virtual fashion, then EVERYTHING is currently free...
  • PSN = FREE
  • Online Gaming = FREE
  • Using Home = FREE
  • Creating life-like avatars = FREE
  • Multiple standard areas to explore and meet'n'greet = FREE
    • Harbor Studio
    • Central Plaza
    • Bowling Alley / Game Space
    • Home Theater
    • Home Cafe / Night Club
  • Multiple developer spaces to explore and meet'n'greet = FREE
    • Far Cry 2
      • Train Station
      • Reuben's Office
    • Uncharted
      • Sully's Bar
  • Multiple hidden spaces to unlock and explore = FREE
    • Uncharted
      • Smuggler's Den
      • Arifact Room
      • Film Room
  • Call a friend on the Home Phone = FREE
  • Invite friends to join you or you join them = FREE
  • Joining Private Clubs = FREE
  • Participate in developer meet and greets and Q&A sessions = FREE
  • Watching exclusive trailers, BTS videos, interviews, etc = FREE
  • Bowling = FREE
  • Shoot Pool = FREE
  • Play Darts = FREE
  • Play Saucer Pops = FREE
  • Play Chess = FREE
  • Play Checkers = FREE
  • Play Mancala = FREE
  • Participate in organized and unorganized gaming tournaments = FREE
  • Play arcade games = FREE
    (and win special clothing, furnishings, and items as prizes) = FREE
    • echochrome
    • Ice Breaker
    • Carriage Return
    • Mercenary Madness
  • Play Classic NAMCO arcade games = FREE
    (and win special clothing, furnishings, and items as prizes - including your own arcade systems to place in your club and personal spaces) = FREE
    • Pac-Man
    • Dig-Dug
    • Galaga
    • Xevious
  • Listening to music at the Listen@Home stage = FREE
  • Dance (if that's your sorta thing) = FREE
Besides all that, several clothes, furnishings, items, and personal space are already given to you for FREE.

And that's just the open beta... as if that wasn't enough, here are some other things that are said to be coming to Home:
  • Red Bull Island Space
    • including 3-D flight sim air race games
  • Buzz! Space
    • including the game "Buzz! Runaround", which supports up to 32 players
  • MotorStorm 2 Space
    • MotorKartStorm game
  • Resistance 2 Space
    • team-based minigame
  • Warhawk Space
  • SOCOM Space
  • Killzone 2 Space
  • Hall of Fame Space
  • 3D Trophy Collections
  • MotorStorm Premium Apartment
  • Remote Controlled Model Boats, and Cars
  • PSP-3000 Treasure Hunt
  • Design Your Own T-shirt Contest
  • MotorStorm VIP Event
  • and certainly more as developers take advantage of Home's Development Kit, including Sega, Activision, Midway, Atari, Eidos, Ubisoft, EA Sports, Diesel, Audi, and more.

So unless you have a massive addiction to virtual items, and want a huge collection of clothing, furnishing, and real estate, and if your concern is cost, you have nothing at all to worry about as far as Home goes. 👍

However, maybe you are right, maybe all this could have been programmed in just a few months time. ;)

Now where Sony is partially to be blamed is for saying they thought it would be ready last year, however, based on what we see and what was originally planned for, it's clear the reason for the extra year was that Home has expanded significantly in both size and scope. I imagine the Home Development Kit they sent out to third party developers probably took them a year to create just on its own.


Sony have had two years to deliver... nothing! I'll get hold of MGS4 sooner or later, LBP doesn't interest me, and as for the rest of the back catalogue, well, its hardly in the same league as what Microsoft has to offer. I seriously thought this year would be the year of the PS3, sadly though, its the year that never was.
Nothing? For someone that claims to be optimistic you also seem to have a very narrow mind when it comes to games. I can't say you are wrong, because whether you like a game or not is just your opinion, but based on the majority of critics, the PS3 has delievered more games than the 360 has that have earned reviews with scores of 80 or more (4-5 stars)... and this topic also just came up elsewhere so I'll just quote it again here:

BTW: As I am fond of data and statistics, I was curious to see what data Metacritic has on what games reviewers thought were the better exclusive games for each system since the PS3 came out... as some folks forget the 360 came out a year earlier... although I think even a diehard 360 fan would have to agree that outside of Gears of War and PGR3, the games that came out during the first year for the 360 were not exactly great games and certainly not trailblazers or revolutionary... not saying they were bad mind you... but just not great, especially compared to those that followed.

So for those that don't know, Metacritic compiles the scores of a very wide selection of well known published reviewers, converts their scores to a 100 point scale, and then takes the average for each game, movie, etc.

I figured an average score of 80 or more seemed like a reasonable criteria as far as what games have on average received the best scores from critics, and seeing as in general there is a significant difference between downloadable arcade & PSN games, I only included ones that were released on disc, thus sold through standard retail stores, and so over the last two years here are the results:

360 = 12 Exclusive Games w/ average scores of 80 or more
(and as it turns out, my list of top 360 games was pretty close to this) 👍
  1. Ace Combat 6: Fires of Liberation
  2. Command & Conquer 3 Tiberium Wars
  3. Crackdown
  4. Fable II
  5. Forza Motorsport 2
  6. Gears of War 2
  7. Halo 3
  8. Left 4 Dead
  9. Ninja Gaiden II
  10. Project Gotham Racing 4
  11. Tales of Vesperia
  12. Viva Pinata: Trouble in Paradise

Yes, it's true, you could say more than half of these are not exclusive to the 360, seeing as they are available in practically identical form on a PC... but some people don't like gaming on a PC, so I kept them in.



PS3 = 18 Exclusive Games w/ average scores of 80 or more
  1. Buzz! Quiz TV
  2. Gran Turismo 5 Prologue
  3. Heavenly Sword
  4. Hot Shots Golf: Out of Bounds
  5. LittleBigPlanet
  6. Metal Gear Online
  7. Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots
  8. MLB 08: The Show
  9. MotorStorm
  10. MotorStorm: Pacific Rift
  11. Ninja Gaiden Sigma
  12. Ratchet & Clank Future: Tools of Destruction
  13. Resistance 2
  14. Resistance: Fall of Man
  15. SingStar
  16. Uncharted: Drake's Fortune
  17. Valkyria Chronicles
  18. Warhawk

Now some could argue that Ninja Gaiden Sigma shouldn't be on the list, as it is based largely on the original 360 game, but it also has a lot of exclusive features and content, and at least technically speaking it is considered an "exclusive".

Also, a couple of the exclusive PSN games that scored over 80 are large enough games that one could also argue they should be on that list, but it seemed more reasonable to only include games that were sold on disc.

And for those that don't care for games that are on the 360, then they are in even better luck, as Metacritic lists nearly 100 games for the PS3 that scored an average of 80 or more.

So again, anyone who claims there are no good games for the PS3, or just a handful... either they have massive hands, extremely picky, feel the same way about all systems, or is just not telling the truth...

That being said, as I feel it deserves being repeated, there are many great games for both systems. 👍

So do you really think Sony delivered nothing in two years and the games are hardly in the same league as what Microsoft has to offer? Seriously? If so, not only is your opinion not shared by the vast majority, but you sound very much like a 360 fanboy in disguise (not that I believ that is true... only that your comments sound like something you will find from those that are), trying his very best to flame Sony and the PS3... but not doing a very good job of it as the facts do not support your opinions.


I'm trying my hardest to be optomistc about future game releases, but knowing Sony's eagerness to keep me hanging on like a soft one, I don't hold out much hope. What do you guys think?

You really think you are sounding optimistic? I'm certainly no fan of Sony as a company, but I have certainly found it extraordinarily easy to appreciate what the PS3 has to offer, and not just in terms of hardware, but the massive collection of games as well (over two hundred already right?).

If you can't find any games you like, either you just aren't looking, have a very limited taste in games, and thus won't find games you like anywhere (as most games are still multi-platform releases), or you are simply not being honest in an attempt to portray the PS3 in a bad light and or simply start a flame war.

I'm thinking you appear to be leaning towards the last couple. :ouch:👎




As far as the comments from bevo about Blu-ray and the market for downloaded movies, J-Pap pretty much nailed those facts. I'd also add that if you track Blu-ray sales, they suggest the opposite is true, and instead of bevo's perdiction of Blu-ray being nothing more than a novelty in two years, sales will have increased by more than double... and that's in the midst of one of the worst financial crisis this country and others are facing.

So no, there are no indications at all that Blu-ray is struggling, and instead the opposite is true, and while DVD sales have steadily declined, Blu-ray sales have rapidly increased.

His predictions sound very similar to what those that were convinced DVD would never succeed and would end up being just a niche product like Laser discs, or those that argued that HD-DVD would beat Blu-ray, or that Blu-ray would never succeed, and we know that none of those predictions came true.
It's also not true that Blu-ray releases are significacntly more expensive than similar DVD releases. There have been many times in fact that Amazon was selling the DVD version for the same and sometimes even more than the Blu-ray version.

I'm impressed with Blue Ray for the most part, other then the ludicrously high price of the films don't really have a complaint about it.
Funny you mentioned the new Close Encounters Blu-ray, here are the prices at Amazon fo rthe Blu-ray and DVD versions:
  • $24 Blu-ray version of 30th Anniversary Ultimate Edition
  • $29 DVD version of 30th Anniversary Ultimate Edition

    BTW, you mentioned Best Buy... they are selling the DVD version for $35 which I think even you can at least agree is considerably more than $13!

DVD's are like $12.99 at the most, even new releases
As you mentioned Best Buy:

Top 10 Best Selling DVDs this week and their price at Best Buy:
  1. $20.00 Simpsons Movie, The (Widescreen)
  2. $25.00 Rush Hour 3: Platinum Edition
  3. $20.00 Kingdom, The (2007) (Widescreen)
  4. $23.50 Harry Potter and the Order Of The Phoenix (2-Disc Edition)
  5. $30.00 Pirates Of The Caribbean: At World's End (2-Disc Special Edition)
  6. $20.00 Bourne Ultimatum, The (Widescreen)
  7. $25.00 Superbad: 2 Disc Unrated Extended Edition
  8. $18.00 High School Musical 2: Extended Edition
  9. $18.00 Ratatouille
  10. $20.00 Eastern Promises (Widescreen)
So no, most new release DVDs are not any where near as low as $13 let alone "at most $13". In fact, do a little checking online and you'll find most DVDs that have been out for even as much as a year sell for $15-$25.

For $13 or less you are largely talking about older DVD releases that have long past their sales peak, not new releases.


the cheapest Blue Rays are $29.99 that I'm seeing at the store.
Well conveniently you left out the name of the store, but as you mention Best Buy; just one quick look online, and I see they have over 200 Blu-ray titles, by far the majority that sell for $25 or less, and about 25 that sell for $20 or less.

In fact, the Blu-ray version of Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End sells for $5 less than the DVD version!

Besides that, just before your posts there has been several posts clearly pointing out that there are several retailers selling Blu-rays for much less than $30 if you bother to look, or use a price search site.




Guess you are also a Blue Ray "Fan" Jamie:)

Might buy the DVD version, more cheaper...and for my non HD TV...I think its the best option.
That would only be true if resolution was the only advantage that films on Blu-ray have over films on DVD. Fortunately that is not the case... and interestingly enough, the MSRP for the 3-disc Blu-ray edition is only $1 more than the 2-disc DVD edition... go figure.

Not to mention the exclusive upcoming BD-Live features for the Blu-ray version:

Warner Reveals 'Dark Knight' Blu-ray BD-Live Features
Posted on Wed Dec 03, 2008 at 01:00 PM ET on HighDefDigest
With 'The Dark Knight' only days away from Blu-ray release, Warner has revealed the final list of BD-Live features which are set to include the ability to record your own video commentary and other additional exclusives.

Leading the just-confirmed roster of BD-Live functions is "My WB Commentary," which allows users with a webcam to record their own video commentary that can be shared online with others. The track will play as a picture-in-picture track while your friends watch the film. (Bonus View-compatible player required.)

Other features include "My Community Screening," which facilitates real-time multiple viewing of the film via BD-Live. Users can chat during playback, connect to community showings our send out invitations for their own screenings.

Additional web-driven features on 'The Dark Knight' include an online destination where you can shop the WB Store, download trailers of other Warner Blu-ray releases, create your own wishlist of upcoming WB Blu-ray titles, and even create a database listing for your current high-def library.

Warner also says it is planning to host a "My Community Screening" with director Christopher Nolan where viewers can partake in a Q&A with the filmmaker. (There is no confirmed event date, but we'll keep you posted.)

'The Dark Knight' will hit stores on Blu-ray December 9 in standard two-disc (MSRP $35.99) and collectible Limited Edition ($64.99) versions.

Seems like a no brainer... at least for those with a Blu-ray player, especially one like a PS3 that supports BD-Live Profile 2.0, with a secondary video decoder (for PiP), secondary audio decoder, hard drive, and internet connection. 👍

However, even without a full featured Blu-ray player, and without a HDTV, there are still advantages that Blu-ray have over DVD, like Lossless HD Audio, cleaner image quality due to bit rates nearly four times greater than on DVD, often given higher quality transfer treatments, exclusive features, much better disc coating protection... and in this case they throw in a Digital Copy edition of the film as well.

That said, I will still occasionally buy a DVD if it's heavily discounted.




These 'opinion' threads come up on all sorts of topics, and while everyone is certainly entitled to express their own personal opinion as long as they follow GTP's AUP, everyone also has the right to disagree with them.

Furthermore, if you are only offering subjective opinions, and are not going to use actual facts to support those opinions, or worse yet, exaggerate or make facts up in an attempt to lend support to your opinions, you should then also expect many to have a hard time believeing what you say is actually even close to being truthful.


"That's all I have to say about that..." :)
 
Last edited:
I don't really think the blu-ray deal was a big thing. Downloads are the future, netflix will take over, and look who has that. I bet blu-ray lasts maybe 2 more years, and then it will be a novelty item. Why would anyone pay 30$ to own a blu-ray disk, when they can download an hd movie for 6$. Right now downloads are only 720p, but I'm sure that in a few years it will jump to 1080p.

Downloads may well be 720p, but as a lot of people are rapidly discovering resolution alone is not the only thing. What downloads all suffer from massively is bit-rate, without that you can offer 720p or 1080p, its still going to macro-block like crazy.

Currently no download service offers both the resolution and the bitrate for video quality that BR manages (hell some download services are at a lower video bitrate than DVD), and that's without taking into account the audio bitrates needed for HD audio.

Not to mention the lack of physical product and lack of portability is still a major sticking point for downloads, hell if anything I would actually counter and say that download services are far more a threat to DVD rental services than BR disc sales.

To feed the same quality of movie as a download is going to take more than a couple of years in regard to the broadband infrastructure and a big investment in terms of storage for end-users as well (at around 30gig for the average movie with HD audio) as a 500 gig HDD will struggle to hold more than 20 films.

Regards

Scaff
 
Downloads are the future, netflix will take over, and look who has that.

And look what films they can't offer... Sony aren't daft.

I don't think Sony are anywhere near "in serious trouble" - not even just the SCE arm. The PS3 is presently the fastest-selling current generation console (4m fewer sales than the 360, despite a huge headstart for Microsoft), the PSP is the current best-selling console full stop. Each PS3 owner has, on average, 4.3 games (Wii 6.6; 360 4.4) and 2.4 PS3 games are sold per second worldwide (Wii 3.9, 360 1.1).

So even with a headstart and apparently little advertising, the PS3 owner has as many games as the blanket-media-coverage 360, and buys them at twice the rate. I wouldn't be worrying about SCE just yet.
 
Back