Speed, Grip/Handling, Endurance, Acceleration...Which is better?

Messages
57
Ok now let's see what the study is on this. What is better in everyone's oppinion, who likes what more and if you feel the need, why do you like that selection better? Or you can pick 2 of your choice that would work to yoru advantage.

Personally I would prefer grip/handling, but if I had 2 def. grip/handling and endurance.
 
well... that's awful vague. It depends an lot on the track, number of laps, and opponents - wouldn't you say?

What do I want endurance for in a 5 lap race? What do I want handling for at the Test track?
 
I've said it before, and ill say it again, in the GT world, Lots of power means lotsa grip, which in turn leads to more pitstops, ill take my Acceleration and handeling, but not grip. (Yes, it's unorthadox.)
 
Handleing and grip for me, no good havingthe power if you can transfer it to the road and still no good if you can't do anything with it.

As they say "Power is nothing without control"


Regards

Scaff
 
Well, Acceleration and Top Speed almost always come hand-in-hand considering they're both directly related to Power ...

Acceleration = Power/(Mass*Speed)
Top Speed = (Power/(Drag_Coefficient*Frontal_Area))^(1/3)

The only exception to this is when you have a drastically lighter car (i.e. Lotus Elise), which will have the acceleration equal to that of a more powerful, heavier car, but won't have the top speed ... And, of course, if your gearing limits your top speed, but that shouldn't be an issue in the game considering you can tune your gear ratios by purchasing a full customization transmission ...

So, obviously, I'd choose Acceleration and Handling in virtual reality and Acceleration and Endurance in reality, and likely get Top Speed as a bonus in both cases ... :)
 
A GREAT example of a car with too much power and no control I think everyone will agree is the Gillet Vertigo Race Car and in some cases, the CLK GTR as well, the brakes need to be much stronger.
 
I haven´t driven the Vertigo yet, but the CLK-GTR(LM) is very good IMO. The reason it has longer brakingdistances is it´s lack of downforce, compared to other cars in same field (GT1). But I can´t say it has bad brakes!
 
The Lotus Elan has proven to me that handling (which in my view is no more related to grip than acceleration) is what I personally need most in a car, particularly for long distance races, and regardless of track, with the only obvious exceptions of Test Course and perhaps Le Sarthe II.

It won the El Capitan 200 miles enduro for me with 127bhp, where previously I had failed against the same competition in a modded Stingray with over 500bhp. The Elan certainly had tons of grip, also hugely important, but it was its forgiving, adjustable, predictable and agile handling qualities that won the race, as they allowed me to complete all 66 laps on one tank of fuel, with only two stops, and my fastest and slowest laps in the entire 66 laps, not including the pitstop laps, differed by around two seconds.

The Elan is only tuneable to 210 bhp but despite that it has gone on to win the Turbo Challenge series comfortably, the NY 200, the Nurburgring 1000 Miles! race (beating the Cobra), the Laguna Seca 200, and the Nurb 4h, despite being comfortably the slowest car in nearly all these events on both speed and acceleration. It made it all up in the corners with grip, but more importantly, its handling allowed me to make up ground in every corner lap after lap after lap with consistency I just wouldn't have in something more powerful but less well balanced.
 
Team666
I haven´t driven the Vertigo yet, but the CLK-GTR(LM) is very good IMO. The reason it has longer brakingdistances is it´s lack of downforce, compared to other cars in same field (GT1). But I can´t say it has bad brakes!
The Vertigo's S**t.
 
Grip/handling is numero uno.

You can always make a car faster, but if it handles well in the first place, then it won't be too much trouble when you add power to it to keep it handling well.
 
Back