i also agree with TuneRVisioN, the way pd does the games is f-in retarded. it sucks. at LEAST get like, the Tesla Roadster inthere, not the slow-@$$ prius. my grandma took a test drive, and intentionally crashed it (Accord in the ditch? no, PRIUS in the ditch. HA!) and flicked off the dude in the car. plus the Smart Car would be cool. and for tuning, why not have more companies for parts? each part from each company offers a different level of performance! NOT THE F:censored: ING SAME!
why do they make the games so boring? why?whywhywhywhywhywhywhywhywhy?!?!?!?!?!?!?! i'm getting tired of Gran Turismo 3 and 4, just because PD made it suck more than NFS. and another thing if you put a stage 2 turbo into a mini cooper it doesn't get a REALISTIC amount of horsepower(horsepower = squared), it gives it WHATEVER THE GAME ENGINE DECIDES(half added to it, mostly)!
don't tell anyone, but this is my first rant.
You don't want the Prius because it's slow and boring, but you
do want the Smart Fortwo? That just killed any credibility you could have had. As for the Tesla Roadster, you do realize that the car was
first revealed (not built)
over a year after GT4 hit shelves, right? What do you want PD to do? Time machines don't exist yet.
Why give different parts from different companies different levels of performance when all that'll do is make everyone buy the best parts and ignore the rest? Why would a company bother allowing PD to use their name and logo when all the game will do is show that their products are inferior? The better solution here, IMO, is to make all of the parts generic and just let players put brand-name vinyls/stickers on their cars instead.
Saying that GT3 and GT4 "suck more than NFS" without explaining why is about as nondescript and useless as a critique can get.
As for your turbocharged Mini, do keep in mind that "Stage II" can mean pretty much anything depending on the engine and part manufacturer, and is not a predefined "percentage" of power. Most of all, it
certainly doesn't mean "horsepower squared," and that is an exorbitant power increase to expect from most engines, especially smaller ones that don't put out huge volumes of exhaust gasses (like Minis).
I do realize that this is your first rant (according to yourself, at any rate), but please do us all two favors -- 1. cool yourself down before sitting in front of the keyboard, and 2. get your facts straight before complaining about something you don't understand.
Continue to rant as you did here, and all you'll do is make yourself look dumb, make other Gran Turismo critics look bad, and reinforce the positive opinions of those who like the game, like
mnm_bmx and
The Vanishing Boy.
Oh, and by the way, repetition, lots of question marks and exclamation points, and lots of smilies do not a coherent and respectable argument make.
^ I'm definitely agree with you, I just hate this ranter's sprawling all over a GT site complaining over GT, gosh. That why I tell them to read my sig.
The Vanishing Boy
If you're still not satisfied with all the driving/racing sims between consoles and PC, stop whining, go drive you own car in REAL LIFE!-VB
But whenever I do that, it only accentuates the flaws in GT4's physics engine and the accuracies in both Enthusia's and Live for Speed's engines...
Did buying wings on your car do anything in GT4 when you didn't increase the downforce? No. It did not increase the weight or anything. I doubt that adding or removing a wing in GT5, if these hideous wings still exist, would do anything if you did not increase downforce. No affect on weight at all.
What the hell is wrong with them? They couldn't add the Shelby GT500 A.K.A. Eleanor, but they added pieces of 🤬 like the Honda Z Act and Life Step Van. Who the hell cares about the Honda Z Act? After one drive of it, I wanted to burn my PS2, cut it in half, take a 🤬 on it, piss on it, kick it, punch it, slap it, and more. 
)
)....
