Supra are not good, Skyline is better...

  • Thread starter oosacker
  • 91 comments
  • 3,633 views

Supra or Skyline GT-R?

  • Toyota Supra!

    Votes: 21 34.4%
  • Nissan Skyline GT-R!

    Votes: 40 65.6%
  • I don't like Japanese cars!

    Votes: 9 14.8%

  • Total voters
    61
Originally posted by jbschumacher
from GT3, Denso and Castrol Tom's Supras dust the Calsonic/Zexel/Pennzoil Skylines.

Run them at Grand Valley, SSR5, Apricot Hill, etc... ;)

No they dont. Supras can only beat skylines on high speed courses, like midfield :spam: :Poke:
 
Originally posted by epic
What??!?!?!?

skyline would get burnt by my supra

skyline is slow, all it has over the supra is acceleration but after few seconds my supra will fly past your lil baby skylines ... specially at the test course...273MPH

though I am a supra man myself the skyline will rince you in a corner its quite simple
 
Actually I believe jbschumacher is quite right, the Supras are a bit faster than the Skylines, in GT3 anyway. That goes for the race cars and the street cars (stock).
 
Both cars are very good. I personally prefer the handling of the Skyline. It is also easier to set up to handle at High HP levels.
The Supra is better looking. But overall it's like trying to decide whether to take Carmen Electra or Pam Anderson to the Prom.
Both are very beautiful. Your friends will mentally bump your "cool points" up by a factor of three if you show up with one.
 
Woa there!, I'd say the Supra is pretty sweet lookin' and that the certain skylines (modified are better looking than most Supras) [anyone disagreeing here has been brainwashed in one manner or another]. Anyhow, Supra = better than Skyline in GT3... in real life? I'd vote Skyline R34 with a good driver is better than 99% of Supras!!

:P
 
how do you make the skyline go faster that 250miles.
my supra can go 277miles without drafing and my skyline can only go 250 and i want the skyline to go as fast as my supra.
 
Skyline's got the prestige, but without my own personal thought, the simple fact that the Skyline's got 4-wheel drive oughta do it. Supra is far FAR better looking though. Now, Toyota: bring it back to America (Nissan, do the same).
 
Forget the Jgtc Supras and Skylines, The Jgtc Nsx`s are helluva better. Come on at least the engine is in the right place (Mid-Mounted) for a racing car. But it does lack appeal compared to the Skyline and the Supra as a road car.
As for the 400r I would kill for that car its just soooo mean. A skyline with 400bhp stock and all the luxury chucked out of it. Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm (insert homer drooling here)
 
its more fun to drive supra, but its harder. Skyline, with its electronic 4wd, electronic LSD, ABS etc makes it easier but less fun
 
Originally posted by Voltron
Woa there!, I'd say the Supra is pretty sweet lookin' and that the certain skylines (modified are better looking than most Supras) [anyone disagreeing here has been brainwashed in one manner or another]. Anyhow, Supra = better than Skyline in GT3... in real life? I'd vote Skyline R34 with a good driver is better than 99% of Supras!!

:P

To settle this a bit...I have tested both cars on basically equal footing, Used 50,000 cr. as limit for modification. Perhaps the Supra has a Higher top end.(by 2 mph) The Skyline (R33) was over 1 second faster in the 0-400m run. 11.655 sec for the Skyline. 12.772 for the Supra. Nearly, a second faster in the 0-1000m run. Things evened out at Midfield raceway, the Supra edged the Skyline 1:17.798 to 1:17.918. Less than 2 tenths of a second. That puts them very close to each other in performance.
I will say the Skyline is a lot easier, and more pleasant to drive fast than the Supra.
 
I can't vote for any of those. You can't compare a RWD and a 4WD car. I love both but couldn't choose between the 2.
 

Latest Posts

Back