The Carmagedonn Thread: FCA and "Consolidation"

  • Thread starter Thread starter YSSMAN
  • 836 comments
  • 74,132 views
They just can't hold on the execs:
Automobile Magazine
Less than 24 hours after Chevrolet’s general manager announced his retirement from General Motors, Michael Richards -- the newly appointed general manager of Buick and GMC -- has also reportedly left the company.

Richards was hired on December 1, replacing Susan Docherty, who was recently promoted to GM’s vice president of U.S. sales. Bloomberg reports Richards has left the company after less than 9 days at his new post. GM could not be reached for comment.

Linky.

I wonder what this is about.
 
If my understanding was correct after reading the Autoblog article, he had a better offer at another company (some kind of thing in Texas). The guy looks like a dork anyway. Stick a young gun in there, please and thanks.
 
they don't trust "young guns" and you know it. your not considered old enough to be more than a mailroom grunt till you need to start taking Viagra!
 
they don't trust "young guns" and you know it. your not considered old enough to be more than a mailroom grunt till you need to start taking Viagra!

Maybe if Chrysler makes a comeback they will(new president is only 39).
 
nope...Obama is 48, not 39.

what I mean is that your not considered "mature" enough to do anything till your ready to retire over here. and Obama is considered a "young gun"
 
Wow. I figured this would happen but still, wow.

Autoblog
REPORT: Old Carco (read: "Bad Chrysler") to not repay $4B in TARP loans

Before Fiat and prior to bankruptcy, the old Chrysler, LLC needed $4 billion just to keep the doors open. The Bush Administration came through with the company-saving cash at the 11th hour, keeping the Pentastar solvent long enough to make it to bankruptcy court. Chrysler was reportedly given $15 billion in total aid, and it appears much of that money will be repaid through future payments and through incentives for Fiat to increase its stake in Chrysler from 20 percent to 35 percent. But that original $4 billion? Don't expect that money to come back any time soon – if ever.

The Detroit News reports that what's left of the old Chrysler LLC (which has been renamed Old Carco), has filed court papers saying that the $4 billion will likely never be repaid. New Chrysler is not legally responsible for that debt and Old Carco doesn't exactly have considerable assets. And the government isn't the only debt-holder that isn't going to get its cash. Many secured and unsecured creditors will be unlikely to see their cash, thought some $21 million in secured debt could be paid. Old Carco contains the bad assets not purchased by the new Chrysler when it exited bankruptcy in the spring. The sale of those bad assets, which includes plants, tooling and miscellaneous items like old company cars, will help pay back some of the money creditors lost.

Lawyers working on the bankruptcy case say it take years before the book is finally closed on Old Carco. One item that could help drag matters out is a $25 billion lawsuit Old Carco filed against former owner, Daimler.

So essentially the American people are out $4 billion, fantastic!
 
Hooray for Chrysler. I have to admit that I'm not shocked, but certainly disappointed. GM is paying back their loans starting this month, so its a start.
 
Autoblog
BREAKING: Ex-Microsoft CFO Chris Liddell named CFO of General Motors
In the search for an auto industry outside, General Motors has announced that Chris Liddell will become the automaker's vice chairman and CFO in 2010.

Set to replace Ray G. Young -- a 20-year veteran of GM -- Liddell, the former Chief Financial Officer for software giant Microsoft, will report to GM's chairman and acting CEO Ed Whitacre and use his financial expertise to right the General's ship after one of the worst years in the automaker's history.

Liddell, an engineering and philosophy major, oversaw Microsoft's global acquisitions, accounting and reporting while leading its financial team, and will depart from the software colossus on December 31. More details on this corporate breath of fresh air in the press release after the break.

General Motors via Autoblog
PRESS RELEASE:

Chris Liddell Named GM Vice Chairman and CFO

DETROIT – Chris Liddell has been appointed General Motors vice chairman and chief financial officer, it was announced today. Liddell was most recently CFO for Microsoft Corp., a post he held since May, 2005.

"Chris brings a depth and experience to this job that were unmatched in our search for a new financial leader," said Ed Whitacre, GM chairman and CEO. "Chris will lead our financial and accounting operations on a global basis and will report directly to me. We're also looking to his experience and insights in corporate strategy as a member of the senior leadership team in helping our restructuring efforts."

Liddell will start with GM in the new year. While at Microsoft, Liddell was responsible for leading Microsoft Corp.'s worldwide finance organization, which included overseeing acquisitions, corporate strategy, treasury activities, tax planning, accounting and reporting, internal audit, and investor relations. He is leaving Microsoft on December 31 of this year.

Before joining Microsoft, Liddell was CFO at International Paper Co., the world's largest forest products company, with similar responsibilities. Prior to that, he was chief executive officer of Carter Holt Harvey Ltd., then New Zealand's second-largest listed company. He also has worked as an investment banker as managing director and joint CEO for CS First Boston NZ Ltd.

Liddell, 51, holds an engineering degree with honors from the University of Auckland, New Zealand, and a Master of Philosophy degree from Oxford University in England. He has served as director of the New Zealand Rugby Union and governor of the New Zealand Sports Foundation. He is a distinguished alumnus of the University of Auckland. Liddell was a member of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Advisory Committee on Improvements to Financial Reporting.

What a goon-ball:
liddell-250op.jpg
 
The good news: GM is back to profit

The meh news: Ed Whitacre is out as CEO

Amid a round of disappointing earnings reports from Cisco and others, General Motors actually had some good news to report yesterday. Following it's May report of an $865M USD profit -- its first profit since Q2 2007 -- GM has posted an even bigger profit, announcing a net income of $1.3B USD on a revenue of $33.2B USD.

GM is also sitting on a stockpile of $32.5B USD in cash -- leftovers from bailouts received from the U.S. and Canadian governments, in addition to revenue for the sales of its laggard brands like Hummer.

That was the good news. The somewhat troubling news for GM was its announcement that CEO Ed Whitacre was stepping down. The quiet Texan had masterminded the company's turnaround drawing on his long history of success as a senior executive, and eventually CEO at AT&T.

The news reportedly stunned GM insiders.

Equally surprising, perhaps, is the choice for his successor. Whitacre will be replaced by former Nextel CEO Daniel Akerson. Akerson, currently a private-equity firm where he is a managing director with the Carlyle Group, currently serves on GM's board.

Akerson is a firm proponent of electric vehicles. As public buzz and anticipation grew about the 2011 Chevy Volt, Akerson pushed hard for GM to increase production 50 percent.

Some are optimistic about the appointment. As a board member, Akerson showed he wasn't afraid to sack people, pushing for Henderson's resignation. Steven Rattner, former head of the White House auto task force, comments, "He's a no B.S. kind of guy, just like Whitacre. His whole operating style is the antithesis of the old GM. It is hard for me to imagine a better choice."

But some fear that he's too much of a financial man and lacks the necessary experience to lead GM optimally. Paul T. McCartney, a managing director of Heritage Search Partners Inc. in New York comments, "[His whole career] "has been focused on making the numbers as best as you can and [then] 'let's move on with the company in some other form.' [He isn't] going to lay out the strategic future of General Motors."

From a purely statistical perspective, the odds merely of Akerson keeping his position seem slim -- GM has had four CEOs in just a year and a half.

However, it's critical that Akerson prove a decisive leader. GM is on the verge of announcing a initial public offering of stock to repay the U.S. and Canadian governments. That offering has now been put on hold as account executives responsible for it reportedly race to change the documentation -- something which gives you the idea of how unexpected Whitacre's departure was.

If Akerson can pull together and repay the government via a successful offering he will offer vindication to Democratic President Barack Obama and his predecessor, Republican President George W. Bush, who both chose to bet on GM, bailing the company out at the taxpayer's expense. Such a success would certainly elevate Akerson into the annuls of automotive executive history.

However, if the IPO disappoints and GM falters, don't be surprised if Akerson becomes the latest GM chief to see the door slam behind him.
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=19344
 
I think someone with "experience" is the last thing GM needs. People with "experience" didn't do a fat lot of good for GM for the past 15 years, so why start complaining now?



Oh, and any IPO GM does is going to bomb. No one will be willing to take a chance on new GM so soon after most of the shareholders of old GM got shafted when the government took over.
 
The performance of an IPO for GM will likely depend on what they're going to do with the Volt. It is hands down the most important thing coming down their pipe in the next couple of years, and that technology is going to be worth a lot of money if it does work out.

At the right price, I'd buy in. I've been considering grabbing some Tesla shares now that those have calmed down a bit as well.
 
I think someone with "experience" is the last thing GM needs. People with "experience" didn't do a fat lot of good for GM for the past 15 years, so why start complaining now?

Indeed. Look at where Mulally is taking Ford. Granted, some of that product development started before him... but what he brings to the table is business sense.

A car industry insider will have too many preconceptions and biases about how things "should be done." An outsider will have none such, and will be able to view the problems of the industry with a critical eye.

Bad move. If GM wants to assure the government and investors that it's serious and stable, it'd pick a management group and stick with it.
 
The performance of an IPO for GM will likely depend on what they're going to do with the Volt. It is hands down the most important thing coming down their pipe in the next couple of years, and that technology is going to be worth a lot of money if it does work out.
There are other companies to invest in with similar technology coming out that didn't within the past year go bankrupt with such a huge debt that the Feds had to basically buy the whole company, and then proceeded to keep most of the management on board anyways.

Any investor worth his salt would also know that the main reason that the GM profit probably even occurred is because of the Toyota debacle completely decimating their sales over the course of the year.
 
There are other companies to invest in with similar technology coming out that didn't within the past year go bankrupt with such a huge debt that the Feds had to basically buy the whole company, and then proceeded to keep most of the management on board anyways.

Any investor worth his salt would also know that the main reason that the GM profit probably even occurred is because of the Toyota debacle completely decimating their sales over the course of the year.

Hmmm... made an on-paper profit... fired their CEO. Made an on-paper profit... fired their CEO... Aha! Made a profit by firing their CEO and saving the cost of his salary!
 
Arise, chicken! Arise!

Fiat-Chrysler Automotive Begging for Mergers at This Point

So, we're seeing an awful lot around the internet about Marchionne beating on his desk about "consolidation" in the market, and not that long ago, GM pretty much said, "HELL THE F NO, BRO," to a possible merger. So, now what?

That Autoblog article suggests that they're trying to pony up to the likes of Mazda, Honda, Hyundai, VW, and several more for a sweet deal. Although we assume that this "consolidation" means improved savings on development and manufacturing, we really don't have any idea what FCA is up to. Are they bleeding money? They've already pushed back development on major projects, is it something entirely different? Are they that worried about competition? Sales have been on fire in the Americas, but back in Europe, it isn't rosy.

What kind of merger do we think is most-likely? If there would be one even at all?
 
It would be wise to avoid that sinking ship. Listen Mazda, please. You've got a good thing going now that you're single. You don't need no man! The little fling with Alfa Romeo is enough. STAY OFF TINDER!

The references...oh them references, pure gold. But yeah Mazda listen up.
 
Mazda has nothing to do with "Alfa Romeo". they are in Partnership "Fiat"

But hey, Is Mistubishi looking for a "partner" for a Lancer replacement?
 
Sergio hasn't fully given up on GM, I read he is trying to force a merger now. He is also looking for a "Plan B" to merge with if he can't force one with GM.

I imagine all the other companies he approaches will tell him to go take a hike like GM did.

The whole thing is funny and a bit sad at the same time.
 
Back