The Chess hints thread ( HOME)

  • Thread starter klondike
  • 21 comments
  • 1,262 views
968
Klondike_rush
Lets talk about Chess, in HOME.

Im trying to find some mates to play chess with, so I made a rather big post over at the official PS forums, and will do same here

This thread can hopefully function as a hints thread and spark some discussion if we have fellow GTP'ers who like chess.

I will start giving some advice for new players who may know how the pieces move, but not really anything more. Today we start with a few basic tips about the opening.

First a few things about me, and a few defenitions, before we get started. I am and older guy 40 years of age. I love video games and also chess. I am not really a good chess player, although I have not found much competition in home chess ( lost 2 games of about 40 games or so). Therefore this thread is working two ways maybe we can find some good players in this thread, and also less skilled players can learn a few tips. So all chess players in HOME can benefit from it.

Also I hope I dont come off as kinda smart guy, because I am really not that good at chess my self, It is just a great passion of mine, and I would love to get some good discusions about chess going.

Ok lets get started.

First you have to understand. You can not win a chessgame by being a good player, or making a good attack, Nor can you win the game in few moves, unless the oponent is really really bad. Most games are like 25 -50 moves for each player, until eather checkmate ocour, or 1 player gives up because his position is hopeless.

The Only way to win a chessgame is when your oponent lose it. ( The losing move always comes, before the winning move) He has to make a mistake, if he dont make any mistakes, and you dont make any mistakes eather, the result of the game is drawn.

The best way is to play patiently trying to cordinate your pieces, and preventing your oponent from doing the same thing. It is the position on the board that determines if you can attack or not. You can not just start a great attack just because you feel like it, if the positions doent warrent it. If you do it, it will lose you the game. So play patient, wait for your oponent to make a mistake will get you a long way to start with.

A few defenitions. Im trying not to go to much in deep details, so these defenitions are a bid widely spoken.

Tactic: A tactic in chess means that eather player will lose material, or will be checkmated. This will in most cases lead to a lost game, even the loss of a single pawn is uasely enough for the other player to win the game by force. There may be circumstances where 1 player would offer a sacrifice for some kind of other advantage. ( Tempo, development, space etc..) But losing a piece, or pawn without any kind of compensation, is most likely a lost game.

Strategy: A strategy in chess, is more dificult for new players to understand, that a game could easely be lost, even if the material is still even. A strategy could be one player trying to trade his bishop for the oponents knight, in a closed game ( a game where the central pawns are blocking each other), so that the pieces have dificulties to manouver. The player left with the knight would have and easyer game, since he could use his knight ( the only pice able to jump over other pieces ) to cause wreck in the other players pieces, since the are not as freely to move.

Phases of a chess game. ( opening, midle game, endgame)

Opening: The opening last from the first move until a player has castled his king, and connected his rooks ( The rooks can see eachother at the 1, or 8 rank ). It is posibel 1 player is out of the opening and is in the middle game, and the other player is still in the opening ( lack of development) This would in most cases mean the player whom is still in the opening versus a oponent whom is fully developed will lose the game, as it is strategly lost.

Middle game: Phase of the game where there are uasely many pieces left, and both players, and trying to outmanouver the other.

End game: Where only a few officers are left, or often only kings and pawns. The combat is mostly about who can first promote a pawn to a Queen ( Or another piece, in some situations he may prefer that )

Today we start with the opening to keep things simple.

So here are the first few tips. These tips are mainly for the opening, but in genral they also play for the other phases of the game. They are not in numeric order. tip 11 is just as important as tip 1.

1. Control the center of the board ( the 4 central squares )

2. Start the game by moving a central pawn to ocopy and gain control over central squares.

3. Only move each of your pieces once. Do not ever move the same piece twice in the opening, unless there is a tactic (Tactic = you will eather lose or win material, or be checkmated) Moving the same piece twice, before you have developed all of your pieces, and put your king to safety, is the first weak move, and it will lose you the game, if the oponent knows what he is doing. Imagine a Football team if it where only 1 player who was runnig around like a mad guy chasing the ball, while the rest of his team where sitting on the back rank doing nothing. Same goes for chess, use all your pieces. A piece that sits on the back rank is uasely not good, if you have a rook in the corner blocked by a pawn in front of it, and another piece by its side, you may as well not have that rook at all, If your openents has developed his pieces, you are practicly playing with a rook less compared to your oponent. So move all those pieces out and capture some space, and control of squares.

4. Castle your king. Castling is the best move on a chess board. It is the only move wich allows you to move 2 pieces ( Rook & King ) in 1 turn. It puts your most important piece (your King) out of danger from your oponent, and it is the first half of getting your rooks connected

5. Develop your Knights before your bishops. It is more easy to find a knights natural squared compared with a bishop. The bishop may be needed to prevent a pin, or you may like to use it to pin your oponents knight your self. You dont know this yet, so move the knights first. Also the bishops already control some squares once you have moved the pawn blocking its diagonal, even if it still sits back at its initial square.

6. Develop your kingside before your Queen side. On the king side you only have to spend 2 moves, ( move knight & bishop, then you are ready to castle your king away to safety. Compared with the Queen side it takes 3 moves to get ready to castle ( Move Queen & Bishop & knight )

7. Develop your pieces to squares that are protected by other pieces, or pawns. If you put your pieces to a square that is undefended ( Or has and infirior number of defenders compared with attackers ) it is verly likely there is a Tactic to win that piece, even it may not look like the oponent could take the piece. He may be able to threaten it with his next move while he also threatening something else. And it will make you lose eather of those pieces, since you can not answer 2 threats with 1 move.So put your pieces, to squares that are protected by your other pieces.

8. Always before you move a piece, ask you self is this piece defending something. If I move this piece it is that oether piece now undefended, and of course also ask your self is the new square for your piece safe.

9. Normally dont move your Queen in the opening. Moving your Queen out will give the oponent and easy target to threaten to capture it, you will have to move it again spending moves with moving the same piece, instead of moving all your pieces, while the oponent he is moving each of his pieces one by one. At some point the oponent will be fully developed ( All his pieces has left the back rank, his king is safe, and his rooks are guarding eachother at the back rank ) while you may still have 2 or more officers sitting at the back rank doing nothing. It will lose you the game if the oponent is half decent.

10. Move the rooks to open files, preferably the two center files, even if they are not open now (the pawns are still blocking the files) They will most likely open up at some point, and then your rooks are standing there on the open file controlling all those central squares.

11. Prevent your oponent from doing all these things. For example you may be able to trade your Queen for the oponents at their respective starting squares, you take his Queen with your Queen, and he has to take back with his King, and now after he moved his king, he is not allowed to castle anymore in that game, preventing him from developing his kingside rook, and also his king may become vulnerable to and attack in the center of the board. Or you may be able to put a bishop on a diagonal controlling the squares his king has to cross to castle, and thereby not allowing him to do so. Or he moved a piece to a square without any protection, could you develop one of your pieces from the backrank to a square where it would threaten his undefended piece. so he would have to spend another move to move it to safety. There are many other examples. Just the general idea is to get your army out before the oponent. because in chess you can not start attacking before your pices are ready. ( Doing so will lose you the game, if your oponent is at the same level as you )

Ok this will be it for now. Feel free to comment. I know some of my hints are a bit widely spoken, but I garanty you that if you are a newcommen to chess playing another newcommer, and you follow these guide lines, you will start winning your games.

I will post some new hints in a few days from now on.
 
I didn't read that whole page of type but I have a fantastic move for the start of a game, wins in about 3 moves. I move the pawn that is infront of the king, two paces, this will free the queen and let her go diagonal right to the other side of the board. Now, if your versing a noob they will normally copy your move and put the pawn infront of yours. This is what you want because as you know the king is behind that pawn. Therefore this completely opens the king and the queen can jump in there. I just realised it isnt a check mate move but it normally ends up a checkmate very quickly.
 
I didn't read that whole page of type but I have a fantastic move for the start of a game, wins in about 3 moves. I move the pawn that is infront of the king, two paces, this will free the queen and let her go diagonal right to the other side of the board. Now, if your versing a noob they will normally copy your move and put the pawn infront of yours. This is what you want because as you know the king is behind that pawn. Therefore this completely opens the king and the queen can jump in there. I just realised it isnt a check mate move but it normally ends up a checkmate very quickly.

Oldschool tactic ( sorry ), when I see this coming from someone , I can prevent this from happening and it will backfire on them,it can get their Queen in jeopardy real fast if you know how to counter it ( pending their defense ). Some players,if you take their Lady away from them , they are just ruined,game over.
 
This is a NOOOB thread.
Yeah, What ever you say bud.

Thanks for the info, I'd love to get togeather with you and play, I'm learning how to play chess IRL and know all the moves of each piece, just no idea of the whole game, looking ahead, etc...
 
I can't beleive where the world has come to if there is a chess playing guide online. Come on, that is really too much..
 
Actually, chess is a VERY complex game and if you only know where to move the pieces then you are not going to win. Knowing what to do in almost every situation is very helpful and will almost definitely put you in the lead.
 
Legendary 724. I am not interested to start and argument with you. just a few things, i have to respond too.

If you dont want to read the thread, well you are in your right to not do it, but commenting on something you dident read, I find a litle weird.

The Mate you are trying to pull of, its called Scholar's mate, and it can be easely avoided. Its a common strategy among beginners, but any half decent player will know how to avoid it, and it will uasely lead to a bad position for white, because of lack of development. White will spend his moves moving the same piece (The Queen) again, and again, while black will spend his moves to move each piece one at a time, build a strong center, get his king in safety, and then after doing that he will be ready to crush white who may still have his king in the center, and not finished his development (Some of his pieces are still sitting at the back rank doing nothing)

Moving the pawn in front of your king 2 squares, is a very good move. The reason is that it take imidiatly control of some central squares. If black repond by moving his king pawn 2 squares like you described, it is also a very good reply, as it also takes control of central squares. These openings are called open games, as the central pawn structure will uasely lead to a open game (where the pawns in the center are traded and the center thereby becomes open) In open games rapid development is very very important. (Get your pieces out fast, even they may not stand at the optimal square's)

Oposed to Closed games ( moving your Queens pawn 2 squared in your first move) will uasely lead to a closed central pawn structure where the pawns are blocking each other. Here rapid development while it is still important, often the player has time to find a better square for his pieces by moving the same piece a few times.

Also I dont know what you mean by saying its a noob thread.

You are right the advise I give here is mostly for new players. Players who have just learned how the pieces move, or players whom may have known how the pieces move for years, but really have no understanding of anything else besides that. Because any half decent player will already know what I posted, about the opening is very important.

Also you are right Chess is a very complex game, that is the beauty of it. Its a game a 4 year old kid can learn to play it. Yet it is so deep and complex, that even the most inteligent person on earth could never understand all of it, even if he studied chess 16 hours everyday for the rest of his life.
 
You can not win a chessgame by being a good player, or making a good attack

I disagree wholly. A good player will always beat a poor player, and almost always by putting the poorer player under constant pressure of attack, forcing them into making quick, snap decisions and sacrificing pieces to save other pieces (or by covering an attack in the disguise of a different attack).

Poor players are often spontaneous - they'll come up with an objective and repeatedly move the same piece to achieve that objective without any other consideration, or they'll just react to how the other player plays. Good players can combine spontaneity with planning - I'll often attack on three fronts at the same time, but throw in a curveball every now and then to make my opponent wonder why I just did what I just did. Really good players have already planned your checkmate before you sat down.
 
Legendary 724. I am not interested to start and argument with you. just a few things, i have to respond too.

If you dont want to read the thread, well you are in your right to not do it, but commenting on something you dident read, I find a litle weird.

Also I dont know what you mean by saying its a noob thread.

Excuse me?:dunce: I am NOT arguing with you, infact I was backing up your thread:crazy: I didn't read all you had as it mostly was advice, I simply added a new idea.

The thing I mentioned about being a noob thread is that is is made for the help of beginners. :ouch:

In any case I'm with this thread and have no idea what the hell you are on about with me arguing with you:confused:
 
I didn't read that whole page of type but I have a fantastic move for the start of a game, wins in about 3 moves. I move the pawn that is infront of the king, two paces, this will free the queen and let her go diagonal right to the other side of the board. Now, if your versing a noob they will normally copy your move and put the pawn infront of yours. This is what you want because as you know the king is behind that pawn. Therefore this completely opens the king and the queen can jump in there. I just realised it isnt a check mate move but it normally ends up a checkmate very quickly.
You can actually checkmate a player in 4 moves, here we call it fools mate because the other player has to be a fool to let you do it ;).

When I get Home on my PS3 I'd be happy to give you a game klondike. I'm not the best at chess but I know what I'm doing, I've been playing since primary school. There's only one of my mates who I've played that is better than me and it's hard to improve if your always playing people who you know you can beat. You tend to use the same tactic just at different times and find it always works. When I play against people better than me I really have to change my method of thinking and approach to the game and it benefits me.
 
I disagree wholly. A good player will always beat a poor player, and almost always by putting the poorer player under constant pressure of attack, forcing them into making quick, snap decisions and sacrificing pieces to save other pieces (or by covering an attack in the disguise of a different attack).

Poor players are often spontaneous - they'll come up with an objective and repeatedly move the same piece to achieve that objective without any other consideration, or they'll just react to how the other player plays. Good players can combine spontaneity with planning - I'll often attack on three fronts at the same time, but throw in a curveball every now and then to make my opponent wonder why I just did what I just did. Really good players have already planned your checkmate before you sat down.

I think you misunderstood my point. Maybe I am not good enough at explaining it, since English is not my main language. Of course a better player will beat a worse player. If a player is so bad he dont see the threads you are making, and responding to them acordingly, or if he can not understand why a certain move of yours is bad, and take advantage of it he will lose the game of course.

The point is there is no forced win in chess. If both players, are at equal skill level, and dont make any obvious mistakes, like blundering away there pieces, or walking into a checkmate wich could be avoided with correct defence, the result of the game is drawn. Therefore you can not win the game unless your oponent makes a mistake. (The losing move always, comes before the winning move)

You can not plan a checkmate before the game begins. You may plan to play after a certain strategy, wich could lead to a checkmate, if the oponent made a mistake. But if he know what he is doing, it will uasely backfire. leading to a position where your pieces are uncordinated, they may not be developed, your own king is not safe etc...

That is not to say you shouldent have a strategy, because you should. players who have a strategy, will uasely beat players, who are just playing 1 move, at a time, without giving it much consideration. That was infact the point I tryed to make with the tips. Because that is a strategy ( Get your king to safety, Control the center, develop all your pieces, place your heavy pieces (Rooks and Queen) on open files (files where the pawns have been traded away). All openings in chess are based on this strategy, because if they arent they will leade to a lost game.

In general you should not try to force things, neather should you play to pasively. Play by the priciple to guard your pieces. Put your pieces to squares where they have control over central squares and other important squares, avoid making unnecesary pawn moves, wich will leave holes in your position that your oponent could place his pieces at.
 
Legend 724 I am sorry if we misunderstood each other it was not intended. I was just a litle frustrated, because sometimes i have a hard time to explain what i mean with the english laguage.

Dave A. Ok lets play a game, ill add you next time I turn on my PS3. I am not that good my self eather. So we can hopefully get some good equal games.

Edit !! Sorry for the double post.
 
I think you misunderstood my point. Maybe I am not good enough at explaining it, since English is not my main language.

If that's true, I'm going to point every native-English-speaker who types like they're mashing at a mobile phone keypad with a fork to this thread. Your standard of English is excellent and puts many of my countryfolk to shame. 👍

The point is there is no forced win in chess. If both players, are at equal skill level, and dont make any obvious mistakes, like blundering away there pieces, or walking into a checkmate wich could be avoided with correct defence, the result of the game is drawn. Therefore you can not win the game unless your oponent makes a mistake. (The losing move always, comes before the winning move)

I'd agree to a level - but it's possible to force a mistake, or even to make a move which isn't necessarily a mistake but still ultimately leads to defeat.

You can not plan a checkmate before the game begins. You may plan to play after a certain strategy, wich could lead to a checkmate, if the oponent made a mistake. But if he know what he is doing, it will uasely backfire. leading to a position where your pieces are uncordinated, they may not be developed, your own king is not safe etc...

It was a slight exaggeration. But if you or I faced a grandmaster, they'd have a couple of hundred gambits in their head, with a couple of hundred mid-games for each and a couple of hundred end-games for each of those. As you play the game, their gambits resolve to specific mid-games, and their mid-games resolve to specific end-games - in essence, they have how they're going to win in their mind before you even sit down with them.

In general you should not try to force things, neather should you play to pasively. Play by the priciple to guard your pieces. Put your pieces to squares where they have control over central squares and other important squares, avoid making unnecesary pawn moves, wich will leave holes in your position that your oponent could place his pieces at.

I'm happy to reliquish control over the central squares if my opponent doesn't control the sides and has castled his King. It gives me plenty of scope for combined Knight/Bishop play :D
 
If that's true, I'm going to point every native-English-speaker who types like they're mashing at a mobile phone keypad with a fork to this thread. Your standard of English is excellent and puts many of my countryfolk to shame. 👍

Thanks for your kind words :)


I'd agree to a level - but it's possible to force a mistake, or even to make a move which isn't necessarily a mistake but still ultimately leads to defeat.

Im sorry. I dont want to argue over it, but it is really not posibel to force a mistake. You can not win the game by force. That is also easely seen when you look at results for more skilled players. Most of their games are drawn. The higher you go in rankings the more games becomes drawn, because the players are less likely to make a tactical blunder. It may look like a mistake was forced, for a less skilled player, but in realyty the mistake was made on a earlyer move. wich lead to the position where the mistake is now forced.



It was a slight exaggeration. But if you or I faced a grandmaster, they'd have a couple of hundred gambits in their head, with a couple of hundred mid-games for each and a couple of hundred end-games for each of those. As you play the game, their gambits resolve to specific mid-games, and their mid-games resolve to specific end-games - in essence, they have how they're going to win in their mind before you even sit down with them.

Yes of cause. We wouldent stand a chance against such good players, because there level of understanding is much deeper, than ours. My statement if for when both players are at equal terms. If you put Michael schumaker in a GT Car, he could proberly drive faster lap times, compared with most other human beings even if they where driving a F1 car. Also why the grandmaster are better is because they know wich moves are good and which moves are inferior. It is the position at the board that determines if you can attack or not. you can not attack just because you feel like it, if your position demands you to defend, you have to defend, and try to produce some counter play



I'm happy to reliquish control over the central squares if my opponent doesn't control the sides and has castled his King. It gives me plenty of scope for combined Knight/Bishop play :D

Yes also as I sayd. I am not that good a player my self. So we can take a game if you are up for it :)
And maybe talk about it afterwards
 
A good rule of thumb is to have 2 lines of offense working at the same time ( it can be done ),incase the other player is focusing on 1,you still have an alternative means of attack without having to reverse your course and re-grouping,this keeps YOU in control and the other player on his heels.Once you start retreating,your " attack plan is diminished " and then the re-group procedure begins,by then you are in trouble.A way to stall an attack is to force the opponent into various situations by threatening a piece of theirs by a "swap out ",most players will not do this,as they want to keep their pieces,not trade them off,and it buys you an extra move,possibly tilting the table in your favor,because now you have forced them to retreat an attacking piece.

It is a thinking game , and the way I was taught , was to think 3 moves in advance ( offensively and defensively ) , while at the same time reading your opponents moves ( their strategy ) , as to set up for an attack or go in for the " MATE " , on behalf of their slip-up.
 
Thanks for the tips in the OP. 👍

I hadn't really played chess before, I picked up the rules quickly but have only worked out today what castling is :dunce: Either way following suggestions in the OP and using a decent bit of strategy and improvisation. I have managed to stalemate some clearly competent opponents which for me is quite an achievement:D in fact I haven't lost a game since reading the OP.

I would love to play some really good players, you learn from the best after all and no doubt the players on GTPlanet will no doubt put my limited chess skills to shame, non the less I would love to have a few matches.

Chess tournament anyone? :P
 
Very good post to start the thread. The tips are very good. If I remember correctly, there are 7 key moves you should make in the first 10 moves, most (if not all) of which you have covered.

Chess is a game that is fairly easy to pick up but difficult to master. I had a brilliant game the other day in Home that must have gone on for 1 - 2 hours. Extremely intense. I had a slight material advantage from about half way through but the opponent was a decent player (at least well matched to my ability) and never gave up. Right until the end, I had to be careful not to lose my material advantage and in the end it worked out in my favour.

www.chess.com is a brilliant site, resource and community. I'd recommend joining up for free. There are free Chess mentor lessons, a daily puzzle, daily tactics trainer, an online chess game and lobby, articles, forums, news etc.!
 
Hi Stevisiov & Obli. Thanks for your kind words about my chess hints thread.

Ill be glad to give you a game, and maybe we can talk abit about it afterwards if you want.

You can add me to your friends list. Eahter PSN-ID. klondike_Rush or klondike_US

Also I will add some more hints to this thread in a few days. Next topic will be a bit about when to trade pieces, and when to avoid trading pieces.

Today I just give a usefull link to a good tactics website.

http://www.google.dk/search?hl=da&q=emrald+chess+tactics&btnG=Google-søgning&meta=&aq=f&oq=

If you spend like 15 minutes here everyday. I garanti that you will start winning even more games than you do now. You can sign in as a guest > Then click start tactics, and then just try to solve the puzzle, they will adjust to your level after you make few tryes, so dont worry if you find them to hard or easy to begin with.

All chess games or more or less lost by Tactics (Especially at the begginer level, and upto master class, most games are lost by simple tactical blunders). There is and old saying chess is 99 % Tactics, while it may be a bit of and overexageration, there is some trueth to it.

Therefore pattern recocnition is a very important part of chess, being able to spot lose pieces, pieces that are subject to forks / pins / discovered attacks, and so on. Simple matting patterns like weak back rank. Critical contructions, like having you Queen on the same file as your oponents Rook, or your two rooks are on the same diagonal, your oponent may be able to threaten them both with his bishop, and therefore causing you to lose the exchange.

If you train tactics, every day, after a while you will be able to spot out these patterns when you are playing. You will start give consideration that you should avoid some constructions, and also see when your oponent has weak constructions, that you may be able to exploit.
 
Cheers, well I am on the EU server, will I need to create a US account to play you?

I am just building experience for the moment, one of the great things in home is that you play such a broad spectrum of abilities. If I went on a chess site, chances are most players would simply beat me because, if your on a chess site there's a good chance your interested in it and therefore there is a good chance you know what your doing.

On home things are slightly different, some people playing chess are really good at it, because they are drawn to the chess table whilst others seldom play it but just play it because its there. This means you get to see lots of different styles of play even if many are rubbish, you quickly learn what is and isn't a good idea. I now have a set plan at the opening of a game. but I haven't managed to castle yet, how do I castle?

From what I thought I knew you can castle when your king is on the same plane as your rook with no pieces in the way, although this didn't wasn't allowed.
 
you are right at more specialised chess sites, most people are more interested with the game and many have more understanding, however there are also a lot of posibilityes to learn, and take lessons, observe game from better players, and meet people who share the chess hobby. Something that is not posibel with the limited interface the HOME chess offers.

On the other hand as you said Home is good in the aspect that you meat mostlty new players, so it is fun that you not always lose. Playing chess should be fun that is most important. Many people including my self have played for years, but often take a break from it, because it can be somewhat stressfull on the mind.

About the catling move. You make this move by moving your King 2 squares to eather the left or right on the back rank ( In chess we call it ranks, not planes. Not that it matters so much. Just it may be easyer for you o understand what people talk about when they say ranks :) )

You move the king 2 squares, and then move the rook to the other side of your king.

You are only allowed to make this move if...
1. You are not in check
2. you have not moved your king or rook previusly in the game, even if you moved your king, or rook, and moved it back to its initial square, it is not allowed.
3. The squares your king is crossing, must not be attacked by any piece of the oponent. Note it is allowed that your rook may cross a square that is attacked by and oponents piece.

Also if you want a more in depth explanation, you can look here.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castling

As it is a litle dificult to explain it when i cant use diagrams on this forum.
 
Back