My only question is how does this actually defeat the point of what people are saying.
It doesn't make any difference. You're right. But that is because what people are saying is rather irrelevant when it's not what they actually
mean (which is rather blatantly nothing more than "we don't want him posting in Cool Wall threads anymore" and taking it away from him is the quickest outlet for that). Let's call a spade a spade here: This isn't about protecting the sanctity of the Cool Wall from "organizer bias," because the event as a concept was going on for years before White and Nerdy took it over and he doesn't run it any differently than any of the other people who ran it; including having opinions about the things being voted themselves.
For crying out loud, two of the previous people who ran it stopped running it specifically because I complained about what they were doing with it; and even
I don't see any serious issues with how White & Nerdy does it that he is to blame for.
Similarly:
So he posts it later on, but anyone with a handful of brain cells (see what I did there) would still figure see organizer bias.
Several people keep
claiming that his personal bias is reflected in how he runs the Cool Wall, and they have to because that is the only requirement of him to run it. It has literally been claimed since he stepped up to take it over. And yet the million dollar question is
how. What is the relationship between the fact that he is outspoken (putting it kindly) and he is also the one setting up the polls?
He doesn't manipulate results. He presents the car information and pictures
exactly as it is given to him in the nomination thread, even copying errors over when the person who nominated the car did a poor job (and certain people have even used that to try to claim he's trying to misrepresent cars). And he incorporates all of the questionable ideas that he
inherited from the former runners of the thread that
do dramatically and demonstrably skew the voting results, and follows them to the letter. He didn't change anything, and the closest he ever came to anything of the sort was making a joke about it that blew up in his face when at least one of the people posting in this thread tried to use even that as proof of the same thing that is being claimed now.
So where does his personal bias actually factor into this? The only thing he does any differently is that he puts his opinion at the end of the OP (as far as I can remember, always clearly separated from the actual car info, mind) rather than double posting at the end, which means it is all of 2 centimeters further up the screen and a wholly meaningless difference for the purpose of this thread, as you yourself noted. I'd personally like to see it happen too, but I'm under no illusion that that is actually what people are angling for here.