It is and it is supposed to be. I had the same thought as I was reworking a 97T setup there yesterday. I like the yellow inner boundary pilons. I think that is a good idea in the spots where they've put them. Both turns would have serious potential for gaining momentum onto the straights that they feed.
The RBR is owned by Red Bull as a marketing company, but their f1 wing did the track boundaries. F1 has had the luxury of big, tarmac runoffs for a few years now. Several of the tracks on the schedule have been designed by the same man. They all have very safe and said massive, paved runoffs. The thought behind it is that with the track boundaries being what they are at the RBR will force drivers to respect them for a weekend. No more pushing it as hard as possible and "if in spin off into a runoff, I spin off and will get right back on". The RBR brings back the days of - spin off and your day is done. The RBR was brought to gt this week, because the f1 race at the rbr is this weekend. It's no coincidence. Check out Vettel's 720* spin off the turn we're talking about, though. I was going to complain in the "ask kaz questions" section, until I was watching practice this morning and saw Vettel nearly bury it in the wall. IMO, having the green boundries is a good idea, but they are not placed well. Both are in areas that will nearly guarantee something moving as fast as an f1 car is going those walls.
The walls are not far from the green boundaries. Vettel was extremely lucky this morning. That would have put him on his third chassis for the season already and he'd be on his last motor before an penalty is issued for using a sixth.
