The Inconvenient Truth About Hybrids: Hybrids Owners Get More Tickets?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joey D
  • 270 comments
  • 16,333 views
you're forgetting that the hybrids are touted as green cars not only for their supposed better milage but more importantly for thier emissions, as already pointed out by wolfe and hamster.

I stated in the first post that they are greener without taking into consideration the building process. But as I've also said the Toyota dealerships around here market the Prius as a gas saver because of the $3.00 a gallon price right now. I would however like to do a study to see how much greener the hybrid model is over the non-hybrid model and see how that compares with buying some other environmentally friendly device like solar panels for your house.
 
Using this little nifty tool powered by Volkswagen and www.carbonfund.org I was able to do some more calculations. The Carbon Fund basically charges you x amount of dollars to planet trees in order to off set the carbon your car produces. VW is planning on paying for a year's worth of it on every new VW you buy, which is only around $50 but with the amount of people who buy VW's I'm going to say this is going to give a huge boost to the program.

Carbon Calculator

The 2007 Toyota Camry, if driven 12,000 miles per year puts out 3.94 tons of CO2 and has a carbon off set cost of $21.68. The 2007 Toyota Camry Hybrid, if driven 12,000 miles per year puts out 2.73 tons of CO2 and has a carbon off set cost of $15.01.

So basically the Camry puts out 7,880 lbs. of carbon per year while the hybrid model only puts out 5,460 lbs., which is a difference of 2,420lbs. Granted that's quite a bit, however you probably would be better off and greener using the money for a hybrid on things like energy saving windows, solars panels, etc.

Basically the bottom line here is there are better ways to spend your money to be even greener then driven a hybrid vehicle. Also you have to consider the cost and the effect on the environment when you have to change out the batteries after 10 years or so.
 
Thre three myths of a hybrid:

1)They are more economical. ---> BUSTED!!!!

2) They are greener. ---> BUSTED!!!!

3)They are the "in" thing. ---> BUSTED!!!!

Mythbuster Philip says hybrids are useless.
 
Thre three myths of a hybrid:

1)They are more economical. ---> BUSTED!!!!

2) They are greener. ---> BUSTED!!!!

3)They are the "in" thing. ---> BUSTED!!!!

Mythbuster Philip says hybrids are useless.
Spoken like a true Michigander.
 
this place is full of herd followers and sheeple innit?

Thre three myths of a hybrid:

1)They are more economical. ---> BUSTED!!!!

i didnt want to break out the big hammer, but i will. EPA class ratings of the prius are in a bigger category than the corolla; midsize vs compact. lets compare a comparable midsize vehicle then hey. perhaps the price difference wont be quite as large as the calculations make it out to be.

2) They are greener. ---> BUSTED!!!!
im just going to laugh at this. seriously. forget it, i call.
corolla; ulev
prius; pzev. again we are comparing different size class cars. how many mid sizes are PZEVs? and those that are, whats thier fuel economy rating?

3)They are the "in" thing. ---> BUSTED!!!!

biggest growing segment in the industry. potential for much much more growth as GM adds hybrid versions of its own. even porsche, mercedes, kia, vw and others are supposed to be contemplating/ working on one of thier own.

Mythbuster Philip says hybrids are useless.

mythbuster neanderthal says phillip should stop believing everything he sees, hears and reads, and start thinking independently. or at least argue like theres a modicum of grey matter in his skull.
 
i didnt want to break out the big hammer, but i will. EPA class ratings of the prius are in a bigger category than the corolla; midsize vs compact. lets compare a comparable midsize vehicle then hey. perhaps the price difference wont be quite as large as the calculations make it out to be.

The Prius is only wider by 1 inch and taller by 0.2 inches. I think they are pretty comparable.
 
neanderthal
i didnt want to break out the big hammer, but i will. EPA class ratings of the prius are in a bigger category than the corolla; midsize vs compact. lets compare a comparable midsize vehicle then hey. perhaps the price difference wont be quite as large as the calculations make it out to be.

Directly from www.toyota.com:

Prius:
Height: 58.7"
Width: 67.9"
Length: 175.0"

Head room F/R: 39.1"/37.3"
Shoulder room F/R: 55.0"/52.9"
Hip room F/R: 51.0"/51.6"
Leg room F/R: 41.9"/38.6"

Corolla:
Height: 58.5"
Width: 66.9"
Length: 178.3"

Head room (with moonroof) F/R: 39.3"/37.1"
Shoulder room F/R: 53.1"/53.5"
Hip room F/R: 51.9"/46.2"
Leg room: 41.3"/35.4"

They look about the same to me.

neanderthal
how many mid sizes are PZEVs? and those that are, whats thier fuel economy rating?

Here is the list, feel free to run the numbers if you like.

http://www.driveclean.ca.gov/en/gv/vsearch/cleansearch_result.asp?vehicletypeid=16

neanderthal
biggest growing segment in the industry. potential for much much more growth as GM adds hybrid versions of its own. even porsche, mercedes, kia, vw and others are supposed to be contemplating/ working on one of thier own.

Just because it's the biggest growing sector doesn't mean that they are good, clean, or economical. Only a few years ago the SUV was the largest growing segment. The only reason companies are making them is that they know they can sell them to a bunch of misinformed sheep in the automotive buying world that thinks they will be saving money on gas.
 
A Michigander doesn't have to support everything the big three do. ;)

Which is exactly why I've scolded Ford for deciding not to do diesel, and really haven't been happy about GM spending so much money developing two-mode hybrid systems....

Although, in a spat of double-standardness, I completely support the Volt. But, thats more or less because its sticking its thumb right in the eye of Toyota whilst giving the rest of the industry the middle finger.

Out green THIS be-yotch!
 
Directly from www.toyota.com:

They look about the same to me.

might be close but ones classed bigger than the other regardless innit? a matter of inches or parts of an inch can make a big difference in interior room and especially in the perception of space.
im not disagreeing that they are very close. they just are not close enough to be in the same classification.


not gonna bother to run the numbers. got better things to do with my time. but if you remove all the compact cars there, then what've you got that gets similar milage to the prius? cost is gonna be about the same as these are not the low cost entry level models. best comparison is fusion or camry i reckon. although i do believe the camry is now classed as a large car. and the mazda 3 might just be larger than compact inside too.

but you (should!) get the point. your BMW and subaru and so on are nowhere near the fuel effieciency of the prius. they have similar EPA ratings for interior volume. not as unequal a playing field against similar size (EPA classification) cars is it?

someone wanna run the numbers please?

Just because it's the biggest growing sector doesn't mean that they are good, clean, or economical. Only a few years ago the SUV was the largest growing segment. The only reason companies are making them is that they know they can sell them to a bunch of misinformed sheep in the automotive buying world that thinks they will be saving money on gas.

theres more than one reason for a company to join the herd. making money was the primary concern behind the surge in SUV sales, and now that traditional truck chassis models have fallen from favour everyone is jumping on the car based SUV wagon/ herd. thats where the sales are.

but everyone also agrees that hybrids are loss leaders and image providers. the current emphasis on greener corporate culture has led to the new emphasis on greener, cleaner cars. theres not really any money in that segment yet.

youre absolutely right in that the sheep who think they are going to get better fuel economy are leading the charge (the celebrities arent helping are they!) what they should realise is that the fuel savings are not as significant and harp on the "way forward" as it were of the hybrids as a solution to carbon buildup in our atmosphere.

remember, im playing devils advocate here. i fully agree that hybrids are mostly an enourmous waste of time. i just wish people could succinctly state their reasons for having a certain position in an argument. most here dont seem to be able to do anything but echo what theyve heard or been told.
 
Which is exactly why I've scolded Ford for deciding not to do diesel, and really haven't been happy about GM spending so much money developing two-mode hybrid systems....

Although, in a spat of double-standardness, I completely support the Volt. But, thats more or less because its sticking its thumb right in the eye of Toyota whilst giving the rest of the industry the middle finger.

Out green THIS be-yotch!

if they can make it out of primarily post consumer recycled materials.........

i believe they will have an immediate greener image than toyota
 
Rotary Junkie, what 1990 Buick are you talking about? Also, on freeway, I manage minimum of mid-30's mpg according to the onboard computer.

According to the onboard computer, my uncle's Probe nabs 36mpg at 80. Does it? No.

To think that a 4000lb Park Avenue/LeSabre/Olds 88/98 and whatever the hell else can get 30+mpg with a pushrod 3.8 liter V6... So... 3800+Vega sitting in the back yard+200-4R and 2.73 gears=uber econo machine. And quick, too!

As to the current discussion:

The Corolla is BIGGER externally.

And I point to the C/H chassis 3800 powered cars. Why can't we do that today?

I can see non-hybrid gas burners getting 60mpg, but being converted to ethanol and only getting 30-40, and saving our fossil fuels.
 
@neanderthal: Look at Joey D's numbers again... the Prius is only slightly bigger in rear legroom and two or three inches more in rear hip room. From sitting three across in the back of a Prius, I can definitely tell you the Prius isn't comparable in seating comfort to a Camry or an Accord.

The EPA's ridiculous interior volume classification scheme (including hatch space as passenger space) makes a mockery out of car classes.

Consider, the Mazda3 Hatch, the BMW M5 and the Bentley Arnage are all "midsized".

And, as anyone who's ridden in the back seat of a Mazda3 can tell you, the idea that it's "midsized" is just plain ludicrous. It's one of the few "sport compacts" left that still feels that way inside.

@Joey D: It's on www.fueleconomy.gov , the ratings are supposed to be implemented soon.

Shame on Toyota for that marketing propaganda... using the old numbers for the Prius and the new numbers for the Corolla... well, actually, not shame, but pretty clever. ;)

@GilesGuthrie: No, I don't doubt a hybrid-owner could get astronomical 60 mpg figures if they drove like EPA testers of old (hell, if we're complaining about gas prices, we should all drive that way)... but in the real world, battery life and charging in traffic present a much different picture compared to the earlier estimates.

When I drove a Prius earlier this year, the battery was nearly flat when I got in. Apparently tropical heat doesn't help it save much, since the AC is on all the time. And, once charged up, it took very deft footwork to keep the gasoline engine off. Kind of fun, actually, and I could see myself doing that kind of thing as a personal challenge once in a while... but in cut-and-thrust traffic, where you're expected to "go with the flow", you'll be using the gasoline engine much more than the original estimates showed.

In fact, if you drive in the old "EPA" style, you can save tons of gas.

I've personally seen pure gasoline engines get 50-60 mpg in economy-mode driving in the city (tropical weather) using economy-mode driving, that's on a modern subcompact with a 1.3 CVT engine, and I've gotten 45+++ mpg out of a 1.5 Fit on some highway driving mixed with the odd bit of hooliganism (that thing is fun to slide through corners)... a bunch of friends reported a barely believeable 68 mpg from a 1.5 AT Yaris in highway driving at a steady 50 mph (never got to confirm it). What has been confirmed is the 70+ mpg that a few people have managed to eke out of the 1.3 CVT in steady-state highway driving.

It's a simple equation... smaller car, smaller engine = less consumption. A lot of the Prius's fuel efficiency comes from its retuned 1.5 liter gasoline engine (less power, more efficiency). If America were to get Toyota and Honda 1.3s in their Fits and Yarises and drive a little slower, they'd get excellent consumption.

But EPA testing on the highway bothers me a bit more now... simply because it's too fast. The EPA should use a comparison of their modified highway ratings and the old ones to show how much speed and wind resistance affect fuel economy.

-----

The other benefits for the Prius (carpool lane usage, parking and tax breaks) are actually a legitimately good reason to get it if you actually want one. But I feel those breaks are quite unfair, and should be extended to anything that seats four and meets a minimum fuel economy requirement... sort of like the gas-guzzler tax in reverse.

I just don't get how just one person using a Prius for a 60 mile journey can be equated to four people using a Corolla for the same thing. It's still conspicuous consumption, and people are being rewarded for it.

-----

Giles, just get your wife the regular Civic... it's fuel efficient enough, and pretty quick for a 1.8 four-banger (sounds like crap, though)... but personally, I'd get her the Fit... and I'd borrow it every Saturday night for a romp in the canyons... :lol:
 
Giles, just get your wife the regular Civic... it's fuel efficient enough, and pretty quick for a 1.8 four-banger (sounds like crap, though)... but personally, I'd get her the Fit... and I'd borrow it every Saturday night for a romp in the canyons... :lol:

She ended up with a 1.4L petrol Audi A2. Nicely screwed together, quick enough if you drive it properly, great passenger area. She's not getting anything like the economy she should from it though, but hopefully that will change as she gets more used to it and learns to drive it properly.
 
Ooh... an A2... we don't get those here... :( ...poor economy? Heavy car?

i dont make the classifications.

I know, but playing DA to your DA, I just had to point it out. Just showing how the figures can be misleading. ;)
 
might be close but ones classed bigger than the other regardless innit? a matter of inches or parts of an inch can make a big difference in interior room and especially in the perception of space.
im not disagreeing that they are very close. they just are not close enough to be in the same classification.

No consumer in the world would compare the larger Camry to the smaller Prius. I'm just being realistic here in what people actually think when they go into buy a car. The Prius could be a full sized car for all I care, but that doesn't make it any different in size from the Corolla. The reason I picked the Corolla is because of the size similarity. I actually could have gotten away with a Yaris since they are fairly close as well but I wanted to give the Prius some chance at being economical.

neanderthal
theres more than one reason for a company to join the herd. making money was the primary concern behind the surge in SUV sales, and now that traditional truck chassis models have fallen from favour everyone is jumping on the car based SUV wagon/ herd. thats where the sales are.

The only reason any company does anything is ultimately to make money (unless you are Bugatti), if they think they can make a boat load off of it they are going to do it. It of course doesn't always work out for them though as seen with some failures in the automotive world, the SSR, the Prowler, the Blackwood, and so on.

neanderthal
i just wish people could succinctly state their reasons for having a certain position in an argument. most here dont seem to be able to do anything but echo what theyve heard or been told.

I'll tell you exactly why I hate hybrids:

1.) As I've shown they don't save you any money what-so-ever in the fuel savings department that many hybrid supporters and drivers argue in defense of their beloved petrol/electric cars. Ask 10 hybrid drivers and I bet at least 8 will say they are saving money because of the car...if not more.

2.) They aren't as green as everyone claims them to be, batteries aren't exactly the best thing in the world for the environment, to make or to dispose of. I'm sure many of you have seen the pictures from Sudbury, ON's Inco mine. If not look it up on Google Earth and just see what the Prius's batteries are making of that town. I won't even get into the plastics on the car which aren't good for the environment either...unless of course they are recycled plastics which I've never seen anywhere that they are.

3.) You would be better off with a low-emissions petrol car or diesel car, which would burn just about the same amount of fuel as the hybrid, put out a little more CO2, but save you money that you could invest in greener things like high efficiency windows for your home, solar panels for heating purposes, or any number of other things. $6,000 will buy you quite a few housing upgrades.
 
No consumer in the world would compare the larger Camry to the smaller Prius. I'm just being realistic here in what people actually think when they go into buy a car. The Prius could be a full sized car for all I care, but that doesn't make it any different in size from the Corolla. The reason I picked the Corolla is because of the size similarity. I actually could have gotten away with a Yaris since they are fairly close as well but I wanted to give the Prius some chance at being economical.

i beg to differ. since the price difference is far smaller with the camry, id say the comparison between them is higher than with a corolla. remember, a prius is not seen as an entry level/ base car. a corolla is. even with the yaris in the lineup.

The only reason any company does anything is ultimately to make money (unless you are Bugatti), if they think they can make a boat load off of it they are going to do it. It of course doesn't always work out for them though as seen with some failures in the automotive world, the SSR, the Prowler, the Blackwood, and so on.

more BS. the big picture is to make money. some of the details are a little more muddled. companies are under enormous pressure to reduce thier carbon footprint, thier CAFE, and other things. for years GM subsidised the sale of base model 4 cylinder S 10 pickups and cavaliers in order to allow it to sell its more profitable suburbans and tahoes. i myself nearly bought a poverty spec S10 for about $12000 a few years ago. which then had enourmous rebates applied to it.
fines for exceeeding ones CAFE requirement are far more henious and add up quicker than discounting pricing on base models whose profit potential is already insignificant. in fact there was a year when production of the suburban was limited to something like 3 months then they started making the next calender years model.

ergo a single loss leading model selling in amounts not much over 100000 which grants CAFE room to breathe is a viable exercise when you can sell 1000000 million full size pickups at a higher profit point and 300000 tahoes and suburbans at an even higher profit point.

I'll tell you exactly why I hate hybrids:

1.) As I've shown they don't save you any money what-so-ever in the fuel savings department that many hybrid supporters and drivers argue in defense of their beloved petrol/electric cars. Ask 10 hybrid drivers and I bet at least 8 will say they are saving money because of the car...if not more.

no argument. they arent what they are cracked up to be but there are caveats as ive pointed out.

2.) They aren't as green as everyone claims them to be, batteries aren't exactly the best thing in the world for the environment, to make or to dispose of. I'm sure many of you have seen the pictures from Sudbury, ON's Inco mine. If not look it up on Google Earth and just see what the Prius's batteries are making of that town. I won't even get into the plastics on the car which aren't good for the environment either...unless of course they are recycled plastics which I've never seen anywhere that they are.

again no argument. but as a way forward they are better than engine power alone. pollution vs global warming. pick one. they are finding new ways to recycle old materials just about daily.
this gets into other areas such as legislation, that dont belong here.

3.) You would be better off with a low-emissions petrol car or diesel car, which would burn just about the same amount of fuel as the hybrid, put out a little more CO2, but save you money that you could invest in greener things like high efficiency windows for your home, solar panels for heating purposes, or any number of other things. $6,000 will buy you quite a few housing upgrades.

BS. a solar panel arrangement costs anywhere from $15-50000. depends on how grid electricity dependent you want to be. windows alone would be $6000. low energy appliances also $4-6000. insulation varies on type and amount. solar heating is cheaper solution but not as effective at really hot water unless one has a big enough collector. which is more pricey
 
i beg to differ. since the price difference is far smaller with the camry, id say the comparison between them is higher than with a corolla. remember, a prius is not seen as an entry level/ base car. a corolla is. even with the yaris in the lineup.

The only reason the Prius is so expensive is due to the hybrid engine, just because you are spending $6000 more doesn't mean you are getting $6000 more car. I go by size, which is what one looks at when buying a car. If you want a mid-sized car you are not going to look at a Prius, you would look at the Camry hybrid. If you want a compact or small car you would look at the Prius and if you wanted a mini you'd look at the Honda Insight.

neanderthal
more BS. the big picture is to make money. some of the details are a little more muddled. companies are under enormous pressure to reduce thier carbon footprint, thier CAFE, and other things. for years GM subsidised the sale of base model 4 cylinder S 10 pickups and cavaliers in order to allow it to sell its more profitable suburbans and tahoes. i myself nearly bought a poverty spec S10 for about $12000 a few years ago. which then had enourmous rebates applied to it.
fines for exceeeding ones CAFE requirement are far more henious and add up quicker than discounting pricing on base models whose profit potential is already insignificant. in fact there was a year when production of the suburban was limited to something like 3 months then they started making the next calender years model.

If this was the case then companies would just make lower emission petrol engines because the technology is cheaper and the cost to build them is cheaper. Hybrids aren't cheap (obliviously) to build or to research. Small petrol engines are. If GM was out to reduce it's overall CAFE why wouldn't they just bring out their small European cars like the Opel Corsa?


neanderthal
BS. a solar panel arrangement costs anywhere from $15-50000. depends on how grid electricity dependent you want to be. windows alone would be $6000. low energy appliances also $4-6000. insulation varies on type and amount. solar heating is cheaper solution but not as effective at really hot water unless one has a big enough collector. which is more pricey

For a large, off the grid kit, yes it will be that expensive and that will power your entire home. I'm suggesting a smaller kit that reduces the power you do use, such as the SPS Energy Cottage 240 Solar Kit which is sold for $3,272.50 plus the cost of shipping. You won't be able to run your entire home off of this but during the sunny months you could take full advantage and reduce the amount of power you are drawing. Or you could even bump it up to the SPS Energy Cottage 320 Solar Kit and really take advantage of the sun's power.

But why not just do the cheap things like adding the $25 compact fluorescent light bulbs that are 75% more efficient then the incandescent ones and last much longer. Or you could get the $100 programmable thermostat.

Also energy saving appliances are only about $100 then the non-energy savings one so if you were going to buy one why wouldn't you just buy the one with the Energy Star badge on it?

Windows for an average house would be about $6000 depending on what kind of windows you had. I know when we put windows in our home it was around that price and we did get the energy saving ones. I can vouch the electric bill in the summer went down as did the gas bill in the winter.
 
What you were getting at in your poste Neanderthal appeared to be a complaint about GM (or insert company here) selling efficent vehicles, but not pushing them, and instead selling thousands more of the 'evil' big SUVs and whatnot. The complaint is valid, but there is one fatal flaw:

GM cannot control the demands of the consumer.

Its up to us (as in, consumers) to demand greater fuel efficency, more reliability, and otherwise better cars for them to sell to us. They sold SUVs by the dozen because its what people felt they wanted; GM (or whoever) wasn't about to complain, as they were the vehicles they made the greatest profit off of. Again, the main purpose of a company...

If we're looking for more fuel efficent vehicles, as many Americans are, we must demand so from the companies we buy our vehicles from. Thusly, many of the companies (including GM) have made strides to provide what the consumers want in the marketplace. While I would agree with Joey that we do need cars like the Corsa and the Fiesta in our country to improve that further, the big companies aren't going to bring the cars here if they know that there isn't a reasonable demand for the product.

...Quite frankly, we should all be thankful that GM figured out that the world-market models are better for America. In many cases they are more efficent, safer, and presumably cheaper if they build them in great numbers. Its a shame that Ford won't do the same with the Focus until the MKIII model rolls around, and furthermore, that we have to wait another two years before the Fiesta makes its way here.

People know that driving big SUVs aren't necessiarily the best thing to do. But then you have people like my father who drive them because he uses them. There will always be a market for that here in the Mid-West, and really, the rest of the country. But, even so, he is still planning on replacing his truck with an '09 Camaro anyway...
 
i didnt want to break out the big hammer, but i will. EPA class ratings of the prius are in a bigger category than the corolla; midsize vs compact. lets compare a comparable midsize vehicle then hey. perhaps the price difference wont be quite as large as the calculations make it out to be.
I'm just gonna chime in here for a second, but actually following the EPA's retarded size classes is a ridiculous argument to fall back on to defend the Prius. I don't give a crap what the EPA calls the Prius, there is no damned way it is a mid-size car when it is remarkably similar in dimensions to the very not-midsized Corolla (and is actually a shorter car). So you can't compare the Prius to a midsized car, because it isn't a midsized car.
 
Ooh... an A2... we don't get those here... :( ...poor economy? Heavy car?

No to both. Kerbweight is 995Kg, which is pretty good for a fully-kitted four seater. Fuel economy if driven normally by a skilled driver should be > 45mpg. As it is, it's hovering around 30mpg. I really have to put this down to the driver, since the Espace is getting greater economy...
 
The only reason the Prius is so expensive is due to the hybrid engine, just because you are spending $6000 more doesn't mean you are getting $6000 more car. I go by size, which is what one looks at when buying a car. If you want a mid-sized car you are not going to look at a Prius, you would look at the Camry hybrid. If you want a compact or small car you would look at the Prius and if you wanted a mini you'd look at the Honda Insight.

hybrid engine? dude. you mean the electrical engine. or do you mean the battery pack.
the four stroke combustion cycle was detailed as early as the mid 1800s, patented in the 1860s. electrical motors since the 1820s. its the integration of both into a seamless unit that has taken so long. and like fuel injection its had to wait for advances in computing power in order to be manifested properly.
the prices of batteries is coming down. technology is making them more powerful, efficient and cheaper to produce. just like old circuit boards are being recyled into elctrical toys, they will find ways to reduce the waste from batteries. they are expensive, but thats changing
i agree that most people shop by size. but most people also shop by price. you mean to tell me if you want a midsize car you shop the mazda 3, prius, 5 series, maserati whatever it is and bently arnage? you dont. you know you have a budget, you stick to whatever your budget decides.

i seriously cross shopped a loaded mini cooper S works and a tahoe and an S2000 honda and an EVO. seriously. theres a whole bag of size difference there. but considering the prices including rebates, they were all in my budget and i thought about them all. 3 are enthusiast cars of course, one was going to be a toy hauler for my other toy (1969 BMW 2002 that would have become a dedicated vintage racer!) then i decided to keep my car, get a bike instead.

If this was the case then companies would just make lower emission petrol engines because the technology is cheaper and the cost to build them is cheaper. Hybrids aren't cheap (obliviously) to build or to research. Small petrol engines are. If GM was out to reduce it's overall CAFE why wouldn't they just bring out their small European cars like the Opel Corsa?

if it was as easy as you say, they would have done just that. in fact i'll quote someone here to make my point for me.
YSSMAN
car companies cannot control the demands of the consumer.
paraphrased

people are willing to spend mid 20s on a green car. instead of spending mid teens on an economy car. it might be a prestige thing. it might be a snob thing. it might be a green thing.
fact is most cars sold in the NA market have bigger engines than thier counterparts in other parts of the world. if GM make thier 1.3 liter compact car available how many sales do you think theyd make? how much would they have to subsidise the price in order to make those sales? would the cost in subsidising those cars be the same as that on a hybrid which also gives them a greener image for free?

the car companies have to make what will sell. japanese kei cars might make it here in the future. but how many of the SUV driving, "i want a safer car" sheep are going to buy one when they know that some drunken teenager in a 70s ford bronco could decimate them by missing a stop sign.
applying just a little thought easily gives us the solution that a higher price point car with more expensive technology that gives you free publicity and a greener image is cheaper than a smaller cheaper car.
remember, the car companies dont just answer to their shareholders. they also answer to the DOT, EPA, NHTSA, ambulance chasing lawyers, labour unions, vendors, advertisers, and unwittingly to organisations like green peace, earth first, marketing and image companies and so on.
making a little car (corolla) doenst cost much less than making a camry. really only a difference of materials. making a corolla sized car for camry money with expensive tech is cheaper than making a kei car you cant sell.

For a large, off the grid kit, yes it will be that expensive and that will power your entire home. I'm suggesting a smaller kit that reduces the power you do use, such as the SPS Energy Cottage 240 Solar Kit which is sold for $3,272.50 plus the cost of shipping. You won't be able to run your entire home off of this but during the sunny months you could take full advantage and reduce the amount of power you are drawing. Or you could even bump it up to the SPS Energy Cottage 320 Solar Kit and really take advantage of the sun's power.

requires an inverter to run regular appliances. this is for battery powered items only. nice cheap kit though. one i didnt know about. but remember, if all youre doing is reducing your electric consumption, you arent generating enough power to charge your plug in hybrid.

But why not just do the cheap things like adding the $25 compact fluorescent light bulbs that are 75% more efficient then the incandescent ones and last much longer. Or you could get the $100 programmable thermostat.

Also energy saving appliances are only about $100 then the non-energy savings one so if you were going to buy one why wouldn't you just buy the one with the Energy Star badge on it?

Windows for an average house would be about $6000 depending on what kind of windows you had. I know when we put windows in our home it was around that price and we did get the energy saving ones. I can vouch the electric bill in the summer went down as did the gas bill in the winter.

not really relevant to the actual car discussion but im going to leave them here so people can see. im a big fan of energy conservation so the more people who read this the better. im all for reducing electric consumption and have actually looked at going off grid. i just happen to live in a stupid real estate environment so i dont own a home so its not going to happen. but i have looked at all those things youve talked about.

its not just that. its;
landscaping. planting seasonal shade trees that shield your house from direct sun when blooming in summer, but when its winter/ fall the branches are barren of leaves and that allows the sun to still give you light and heat.
insulation.
design. different floorplans of the same size will have radically different energy consumption.
orientation, you need a large south facing wall for a heat collection/ passive radiation and also a south facing roof for solar panels. that way you harness more of the suns power in winter. in summer its a given youre gonna get it.
materials. this ones a duh. but windows and insulation come to mind.
reduced consumption as youve stated. this involves everything from what appliances you use to how you use them and when you use them.

but all that is nothing without the big one, vigilance. no use having an energy efficient home if youre gonna leave the windows open all day. lights on. etc
 
I'm just gonna chime in here for a second, but actually following the EPA's retarded size classes is a ridiculous argument to fall back on to defend the Prius. I don't give a crap what the EPA calls the Prius, there is no damned way it is a mid-size car when it is remarkably similar in dimensions to the very not-midsized Corolla (and is actually a shorter car). So you can't compare the Prius to a midsized car, because it isn't a midsized car.

yes but the sheep follow them when they go to consumer reports or some other such site and its there listed as compact. dont talk to me about it. i know its BS.

its like how the PTcruiser is defined as a truck for EPA fuel economy ratings because it has a flat load floor. truck my 4$$. its a dodge neon in drag. its not even a little trucklet like the south african nissan bakkie or ford bantam

its bogus, but its what the companies do to make money. they find every single little thing they can get away with because the regulators are not making it easy. neither are the litigators.
 
neanderthal
people are willing to spend mid 20s on a green car. instead of spending mid teens on an economy car. it might be a prestige thing. it might be a snob thing. it might be a green thing.
fact is most cars sold in the NA market have bigger engines than thier counterparts in other parts of the world. if GM make thier 1.3 liter compact car available how many sales do you think theyd make? how much would they have to subsidise the price in order to make those sales? would the cost in subsidising those cars be the same as that on a hybrid which also gives them a greener image for free?

the car companies have to make what will sell. japanese kei cars might make it here in the future. but how many of the SUV driving, "i want a safer car" sheep are going to buy one when they know that some drunken teenager in a 70s ford bronco could decimate them by missing a stop sign.
applying just a little thought easily gives us the solution that a higher price point car with more expensive technology that gives you free publicity and a greener image is cheaper than a smaller cheaper car.
remember, the car companies dont just answer to their shareholders. they also answer to the DOT, EPA, NHTSA, ambulance chasing lawyers, labour unions, vendors, advertisers, and unwittingly to organisations like green peace, earth first, marketing and image companies and so on.

Excellent point here. 👍

Hopefully, from what we're seeing the press and pubs push, more people in the USA will give subcompacts a second look (and, hopefully open up the market for even smaller cars), considering that many new subcompacts are quite safe.

making a little car (corolla) doenst cost much less than making a camry. really only a difference of materials. making a corolla sized car for camry money with expensive tech is cheaper than making a kei car you cant sell.

And there's another whole can of worms right there... that's exactly why the US of A became SUV country. Making a big truck that gets teens in MPG doesn't cost all that much more than making a car that gets 20's... but people will pay top dollar for them, and that's why the big three have been pushing them.

But those big trucks are subsidized, too... with gas guzzler laws that effectively subsidize SUVs as compared to cars.

If the government were to change the laws to accurately reflect the civilian non-commercial use of "light trucks", the buying demographic would change rather drastically. But then, people are already migrating away from SUVs due to fuel prices.

There's no need to put a subsidy on subcompacts or keis to get them to sell... just a need to rationalize the tax structure and exemptions that push consumers on either end of the scale either to gas guzzling trucks or to Prii.

The big snag for kei car acceptance in the US is the highway. Most kei cars would struggle to make 100 mph. *shrug* not a problem if you're trying to save gas... :lol: ...but I think they'd sell in decent numbers, at least, to city-dwellers.

-------

By the way, despite the fact that I drive my compact so hard I regularly get less than 20 mpg, I'm kind of a sucker for energy conserving appliances, myself. I usually pay a premium to get the appliance with the lowest energy consumption for its class.

A 65-watt compact flourescent? That's a guzzler!... :lol: I'm using GE 8watt spiral compacts. I've got four in my bedroom, about 32 watts total, less than my old flourescent fixture (60 watt, full-sized), and provide about twice the brightness, despite being hooded.

My living room has 9 of them, on separate circuits, so I can set them on "mood" lighting or "full disclosure" :D , they work about as well as four 60 watt straight bulbs do.

The cost is higher upfront, yes, but you can see ROI (return on investment) on these things in less than a year. And they look damn cool, too. My place looks like a frigging' hotel now... :lol:

But that's good economics. Something that I still don't see coming out of a non-subsidized Prius for low-end users. (which is about most of the world, excluding the US, Europe and Japan)

I've talked to the local Toyota people at a recent carshow, and prospects for Prius sales here look grim. Without US-style hybrid tax breaks, the Prius commands a healthy 100% premium over the most expensive Corolla. It'd take almost forever to make that money back.
 
Round Three: My Car is Better then Your Camry

The Toyota Camry is the best selling car in America if I'm not mistaken, so just how much better off with you be with the hybrid model? I'm guessing not much better.

The Camry will run you $18,570 and get you 21 city and 31 highway giving you an average of 26 mpg. With the 18.5 gallon fuel tank you can go 481 miles before you are dead in the water.

The Camry Hybrid will run you $25,200 and get you 33 city and 34 highway giving you an average of 33.5 mpg. With the 17.2 gallon fuel tank you can go 576.2 miles before you run out of fuel.

Same car, $6,630 price difference and a 95.2 range difference. This isn't looking good for Mr. Hybrid Camry.

The Camry would need to be filled up 25 times per year at $50.88 per fill up or $1,271.88 per year (**this stuck me as high). The Hybrid would need to be filled up 21 times per year meaning that it would cost you $47.30 to fill up and $993.30 per year. A difference of $278.58.

A hybrid Camry would take 23.75 years to balance out cost wise...seriously that's about a quarter of your life.


Do the batteries in the hybrids even last long enough to own them till they pay for themselves?


And about the Jetta TDI thing, I refer you to youtube. One user, DavidsFarm, took the engine and 5-speed that someone donated, which came from a Jetta and can be seen as "The Swinging Diesel", and installed it in the chassis of a first-gen Dodge minivan. He can be heard saying it got nearly 50 miles to a gallon on one of the videos about it.


Also, I've heard that it's acually better for the environment to keep a car a long time, but keep it in the best of shape, than constantly buying a new one every 3-5 years. You believe that or is it something for the mythbusters to tackle?
 
Do the batteries in the hybrids even last long enough to own them till they pay for themselves?

The thought is the batteries last between 10-12 years so if you bought the Camry that means you would have to change them twice, which of course would be a several thousand dollars.

TestECull
And about the Jetta TDI thing, I refer you to youtube. One user, DavidsFarm, took the engine and 5-speed that someone donated, which came from a Jetta and can be seen as "The Swinging Diesel", and installed it in the chassis of a first-gen Dodge minivan. He can be heard saying it got nearly 50 miles to a gallon on one of the videos about it.

I believe then can easily get more although I was just going by the EPA figures. I've had friends average 60 mpg on the highway with their TDI's.
 
Honestly, you first post in the topic should win an award or something. It was flatout brlliant.
 
Back