The New 350Z 2007

  • Thread starter Thread starter Turbo Lag
  • 41 comments
  • 2,297 views
I hope Nissan put some effort into quelling some of the NVH problems with the VQ in the HR update. Great motor, but the old one didn't exactly act happy at 6k+... now that owners can wind it out to 7.5k, I wonder what trim bits they can shake loose in the process.


M
 
Same problem. I even tried looking it up on their site and it shows they have the article, but when you click on it, it sends you to the main page.
 
19bhp more for automatics--but only 6bhp more for manual transmissions? Did I read that right? More power with more gas mileage is a very good thing. Nice work Nissan.
 
Umm it looks almost the same apart from the new headlights and what looks to be a new front bumper. We need more pictures though to really compare it. I hate companies that redo a car and make them almost he same as the previous one but I can understand why Nissan have done it with this one it could be because that the orginal 350Z was such a success that they don't really want to change it vivdly as it may lose customers on the looks front. Also it may mean that all the current modfication parts may still be able to instantly fit.
 
Bear in mind this isn't a 350Z mk2 or the next gen Nissan Z car. This is meerely a reworked 350Z, they've updated the model to brigde to time between now and the next gen Z car. They haven't radically altered the styling becasue that would imply that it's a different car, it's not, it's just a model update in the 350Z lineup.

For thoes who can't see the article.

car and driver
021920071416347011.jpg


2007 Nissan 350Z - Car News

An 80-percent-new engine adds six ponies while sipping less fuel.
February 2007

The only exterior change to the 2007 350Z may be subtle—a new hood with a slight center bulge—but there are big changes under that hood. Power is increased to 306 horsepower, a modest six-hp bump for manual-transmission Zs and 19 for automatics, but Nissan claims that 80 percent of the Z’s prolific 3.5-liter VQ engine has been changed. This is the same update—and the same engine—that powers the Infiniti G35 sedan. The changes were extensive enough that Nissan renamed its celebrated V-6 “VQ35HR” (just rolls off the tongue, eh?). HR stands for "high-revving," reflecting the higher redline for the manual-transmission model, which increases from 7000 rpm to 7500. (The less-fortunate driver of an automatic 350Z can only rev to 6600 rpm, as with the previous engine.)

Specifically, the changes to the engine include a higher block deck height, which also results in longer connecting rods, hence the taller hood and a redesigned front strut-tower brace. The VQ35HR also has a new dual-intake system, revised cylinder heads, variable valve timing that operates over a wider range, and a higher compression ratio (10.6:1, up from 10.3:1). Other highlights are asymmetrical piston skirts and a stiffer cast aluminum engine cover and oil pan.

The benefits are twofold: In addition to the few extra horsepower, the fuel economy is improved by 1 to 2 mpg in EPA city and highway ratings for both manual- and automatic-transmission versions of the coupe and roadster. Engine smoothness is improved as well, and the wider torque band should result in slightly better midrange acceleration.
 
Ho hum, la-de-dah...

Don't get me wrong, I still "like" the 350Z for what its worth, but this isn't a dramatic change that will automatically make the car 1000X better. Its just a band-aid to hold us over until the next model appears...

...That is, whenever Nissan decides to finish the GT-R and do a new 350Z...

Until then, I'm going to be looking at Mustangs and waiting for the new Camaro and Challenger...
 
Until then, I'm going to be looking at Mustangs and waiting for the new Camaro and Challenger...
Good Idea. Also about Nissan doing the Gt-R and haven't decided to finish it yet well here in the UK at the moment they are obssessed with the Quashiqui or something like that. It makes more sense now that I know itsn't a Mark 2
350Z just a refiddled one.
 
Has the 2007-MY been out that long, or is Nissan just a little late to the table? 2008 model year begins in less 3 months.

Just curious, since EPA fuel figures change for all 2008s; not that 350Z owners/prospective buyers care much about those things.
 
The one thing that has always bothered me about the Z is that Nissan never really seemed to have embraced it like they should have. They show us all of these fancy one-off models at the various auto shows, say "Were thinking about building it," and then go off and do nothing.

Again,t his is by no means a blatant attack against the 350Z, as I do like the car, but certainly a criticism of the way Nissan has handeled the boat. They hang cars like the GT-S in front of our face, and do nothing about them. Yes, I realize that the new engine is supposed to be a "game changer," but considering that you're really only competing against the RX8 and the Mustang GT in America, a few extra ponies and a bump in the hood isn't going to make everyone go out and buy-one.

...And certainly, having the GT-R constantly looming over our heads can't be good for sales of the car either...
 
Has the 2007-MY been out that long, or is Nissan just a little late to the table? 2008 model year begins in less 3 months.

The 2008 model year began on January 1, 2007 although I know of no 2008 models out yet.

However, the 2006 Mercedes CLS was the first 2006 model, released on January 26, 2005, and the 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe was the first '07, released on January 17, 2006.

In other news - given that the 350Z debuted for 2003, are there any plans for a full redesign any time soon? Come on Nissan...
 
The one thing that has always bothered me about the Z is that Nissan never really seemed to have embraced it like they should have. They show us all of these fancy one-off models at the various auto shows, say "Were thinking about building it," and then go off and do nothing.

Maybe this time the hood bulge leaves room for the supercharger? In any event, why would they change what's still selling? It leaves more time to drag out lesser models, pushing the better stuff further into the future, meaning they make more sales (and more money) on the same development investment. Why rush when you aren't really being challenged?

At least, that's the ideal situation.
 
Maybe this time the hood bulge leaves room for the supercharger? .

Well the Z now using the VQ35HR which has a taller deck height and a new intake manifold, I think would take up the extra room provided by the buldge. Supercharged version would be nice though.
 
The 300ZX and the R34 used to have fairly similar power levels back in there day but back then the R34 was a totaly different kind of car than the 300ZX. The new GT-R however is almost identical to the 350Z in that respect. both two door hatch backs, similar size, shesh they're bassed on the same chassis. as much as Z car enthusiasts and nissan themselves would like a higher performance 350Z i'd venture to say it wont happen. The GT-R will keep the 350Z held down power wise just like the corvette kept the F body camaro down. I'd be suprised if it got any kind of forced induction at all, nissan definately wont want the 350Z stealing sales from the GT-R and if it did have similar power, rear wheel drive devotees and general sports car consumers alike would choose the 350Z as it has more familiarity here as well.
 
The problem is that we already know that the GT-R will have between 400-500 BHP, so a supercharged version of the 350Z (which will be heavier) with 350-380 BHP wouldn't be a sales-killer. It would still have to work with the "lesser" RWD setup, and it would do without usable backseats. Nissan would have absolutely nothing to worry about against the GT-R if they built a few thousand high-power 350Zs a year...

Hell, considering that we won't get the GT-R until calendar-year 2008, Nissan has no reason not to build a few special 350Zs to hold us over for a while.
 
The 2008 model year began on January 1, 2007 although I know of no 2008 models out yet.
The 2008 Lexus RX 350 is out. Are you ready for the list changes?
  • One new wheel choice.
  • Two new colors.
  • New EPA fuel mileage sticker.
  • Four chrome-finish door handles.
Lexus set the alarm early, but woke up on Saturday by mistake.
 
Wow. I don't think even GM is that lazy. I hope they put more changes into the rest of their cars!
(Referring to Lexus, not Nissan).
 
I hope they put more changes into the rest of their cars! (Referring to Lexus, not Nissan).
Usually they release an all-new model early in the year. They tend to wait until the conclusion of June/beginning of July for those types of minor or superficial changes pertaining to a new model year.

My theory is the EPA stickers; it makes the remaining RX 400h SUVs on the lot look that much more enticing, before they get called out by their stickers.

Just a hunch.
 
Yes, I'm going to laugh rather hard when Toyota/Lexus can't go running around with their unrealistic MPG figures now that the EPA have reeled them in. But alas, GM is getting into the Hybrid game (Tahoe and Escalade Hybrids by the end of the year), as is most of the rest of the market.

...Crap...

Well, at least VW is sticking with diesel-power...
 
The 2008 Lexus RX 350 is out. Are you ready for the list changes?
  • One new wheel choice.
  • Two new colors.
  • New EPA fuel mileage sticker.
  • Four chrome-finish door handles.
Lexus set the alarm early, but woke up on Saturday by mistake.

What's the new wheel choice?! It's been the same one since 2004! (except on the Hybrid)
 
I think the best thing Nissan could do would be to add the supercharger with the 4WS option the G35 has. But I'm eccentric.
 
Car and Driver said it was an option on the redesigned one in the most recent issue.
At least it isn't 4WS with FWD (I'm looking at you, Honda Prelude. And Toyota Celica. And Mazda 626. And Honda Accord).
Or 4WS with AWD, leading to cars that weigh as much as Texas (take a guess).
 
Nissans electric 4WS doesn't weight much. especially considering the increasing weight of cars these days.
 
Back