For this to be an 'accurate list', then the organizers of the poll should have defined the word "New"....as to me, the word 'New' incorporates 20th/21st technology. (1800 & Beyond)
However, since this was not taken into consideration at the time the poll was initiated, then IMHO, for as great an achievement as building the Great Wall of China, the Panama Canal, English Channel, Sydney Opera House, Leaning Tower of Pisa, Etc, Etc., one must look at the sheer beauty of what "Mother Nature", or should I say "God", created in the Grand Canyon!
Not a single person who has ever seen it can walk away not admiring the sheer beauty of such a spectacle and I truly believe should forever be considered a "Wonder of the World!"
Honestly, for me, when I think of 'wonder', I think of something that when I see it, I instantly think to myself:
"Holy ****king sh**!" "This exists on planet earth!"
Thus, for a list of 'new wonders of the world' to be truly identified, someone needs to set the definitions of both 'new' (how many years old is it 100? 1,000) and 'wonder' (man-made or not?)
And when one defines "wonder", then what precedence do we as a society use to determine such a monument? Height? Width?
What about 'iconic value', or 'importance factor'...
Meaning, does the reference to the specific 'wonder' invoke instant recognization, such as the "Golden Gate Bridge" (I'm sure more people, when asked, would place this bridge in the state of California, then those who could place the location of "Mount Rushmore") or the overall importance of said wonder to society as a whole stand out?
As it stands now, the list of "7 NEW Wonders of the World" has not been properly defined, thus in my opinion, the list is inconclusive.
BUT...This is just my opinion!
SRD:
PS: Hopefully I didn't confuse anyone by what I was trying to say...
