- 12,389
- Betelgeuse
- Beeblebrox_237
I'm sure adding a fifth lug nut would not have been as heavy as adding a glovebox.
DON'T FRET!Oh god. If you live in a state where the front plate is required and is white...
![]()
It's wabbit season!
Same as Honda (NSX R, as-well as many others).Again, this is Mazda we're talking about, who has been known to go to great lengths to reduce weight. (Mazda2)
You're not just adding a fifth lugnut. You're adding four of them on four studs on a bigger hub with a bigger bearing, on which a wheel with a larger hub is mounted.I'm sure adding a fifth lug nut would not have been as heavy as adding a glovebox.
Again that depends on personal preference, and I guess which company it is. Personally I don't call the center storage a glove box, and working for Nissan they don't either.Same as Honda (NSX R, as-well as many others).
It's also just speculation on my part, but the whole glovebox thing doesn't make sense to me, as by the looks of it there is a glove box (with door) positioned between the seats.
Just saying.
Yep, they're usually called storage bins.Again that depends on personal preference, and I guess which company it is. Personally I don't call the center storage a glove box, and working for Nissan they don't either.
But remember, most of the space occupied by a fifth lug nut (yes, on all four wheels, I know that much about cars) is already occupied by metal. It would be, at most, a couple hundred grams of extra weight per corner. A glovebox would require essentially another large plastic piece on the dashboard, different packaging inside the dashboard, some sort of lining, and a latching mechanism. And all that reengineering of the dashboard adds weight.You're not just adding a fifth lugnut. You're adding four of them on four studs on a bigger hub with a bigger bearing, on which a wheel with a larger hub is mounted.
A glovebox has various design components to accommodate it but almost all of them are cheap plastic or rubber. And a lightbulb.
The roof is stored between the trunk and the cabin so it can't be a pass-through. The rear glove box will be the same as the NC and will probably hide the fuel door opener as well.
Some top-up action.
That's because it's a VW, known for their trademark (sign of quality) "ClunK!".I know the glove box door on my GTi is pretty hefty. And that's just the door.
A glovebox would require essentially another large plastic piece on the dashboard, different packaging inside the dashboard, some sort of lining, and a latching mechanism. And all that reengineering of the dashboard adds weight.
But remember, most of the space occupied by a fifth lug nut (yes, on all four wheels, I know that much about cars) is already occupied by metal. It would be, at most, a couple hundred grams of extra weight per corner. A glovebox would require essentially another large plastic piece on the dashboard, different packaging inside the dashboard, some sort of lining, and a latching mechanism. And all that reengineering of the dashboard adds weight.
It's not that simple.But remember, most of the space occupied by a fifth lug nut (yes, on all four wheels, I know that much about cars) is already occupied by metal.
It's not that simple.
![]()
![]()
That's just the hub. The hub mounts to the spindle which has to be larger. The bearing goes in between them and it has to be larger. The brake rotor fits over top and it needs a larger, thicker hat. The hub of the wheel itself has to be larger. Then you've got the measly extra nut per corner. The only part of that equation that isn't steel is the aluminum wheel.
Anyone heard? 2 litre engine! Pity its a fair bit down on power, its RWD, would like it to have more than the latest B-segment hatches, even if its naturally aspirated. Should've stolen Alfa's engine, would've been the best part of the car; imo.
Especially in the Miata. Previous cars have been very sensitive to unsprung weight, it would no doubt be the same for this one.Not to mention that that is all unsprung weight, which is far worse than the suspended weight of the glove box.
I think the front headlights are about 15-20% too small, don't know about anyone else.
I'm just glad its out (finally), so we can hopefully see the Alfa Romeo Spider version asap. I wonder how soon until it's revealed, that's where this news story really ends for me.
EDIT: Also, silver wheels would've been nice to see, Red/Black doesn't work imo... Struggling to think of a colour that I like black wheels on, maybe I don't like black wheels at all.
It's not that simple.
![]()
![]()
That's just the hub. The hub mounts to the spindle which has to be larger. The bearing goes in between them and it has to be larger. The brake rotor fits over top and it needs a larger, thicker hat. The hub of the wheel itself has to be larger. Then you've got the measly extra nut per corner. The only part of that equation that isn't steel is the aluminum wheel.
This is all true. However, I do think that by adding extra leg room for the passenger, other parts of the car can be made smaller and lighter. So it's hard to tell what would save more weight.A fifth lug is not just a lug and nut... you will often have a bigger hub carrier to go with it. If I recall right, Mazda's five lug hubs use the 114mm spacing (Ford is the one that uses some weird 100mm five lug job), whereas their four lug hubs typically use 100mm spacing... that translates to a smaller, lighter hub, overall.
-
The glovebox does save weight... perhaps a few pounds... but I believe the more important reason for removing it is to carve out extra legroom for the front passenger.
This is all true. However, I do think that by adding extra leg room for the passenger, other parts of the car can be made smaller and lighter. So it's hard to tell what would save more weight.
It probably depends on how tightly they want to package the car. They might be able to relocate components in the engine bay and take one or two cm out of the overall length of the car, since they can shorten the passenger footwell and relocate electronic equipment inside the passenger side dashboard.The glovebox sits on just one side of the car. Engineers don't change chassis hardpoints just because you don't put one in.
They better not. The NC has that stupid AKE hump in the passanger footwell that even shorter people complain about.It probably depends on how tightly they want to package the car. They might be able to relocate components in the engine bay and take one or two cm out of the overall length of the car, since they can shorten the passenger footwell and relocate electronic equipment inside the passenger side dashboard.