As we know, this is the helmet that Yamauchi was using at the 2009 and 2010 Nurburgring. As of the 2012 edition, I believe the back has changed slightly. New DLC anyone?
however, my question with this helmet is this. Why is there a "reflection of office" at the back on the chrome section as pointed out originally by Scuderia Paul? Is this some sort of mistake, or an intentional Easter Egg? It sure doesn't look like any part of the PD office from what I can see, even if the color scheme matches.
https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/showthread.php?t=136312&page=139
And looking more closely, it seems like there is a reflection of a photographer (?) in the middle part. Maybe he was taking a picture of the helmet in some unseen part of the PD office, and unintentionally got himself "taken" into the model. Compare to the original helmet as seen here:
http://www.crushdrive.com/watch/kazunori-yamauchi-at-nuerburgring-24h-race-2010/654608
At 0.06, one can notice clearly that the chrome checks were supposed to be reflective with no motif in them.
If this is indeed a mistake, I should think PD try to correct it given their legendary attention to detail. So someone twitter Kaz about this please?
however, my question with this helmet is this. Why is there a "reflection of office" at the back on the chrome section as pointed out originally by Scuderia Paul? Is this some sort of mistake, or an intentional Easter Egg? It sure doesn't look like any part of the PD office from what I can see, even if the color scheme matches.
https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/showthread.php?t=136312&page=139
And looking more closely, it seems like there is a reflection of a photographer (?) in the middle part. Maybe he was taking a picture of the helmet in some unseen part of the PD office, and unintentionally got himself "taken" into the model. Compare to the original helmet as seen here:
http://www.crushdrive.com/watch/kazunori-yamauchi-at-nuerburgring-24h-race-2010/654608
At 0.06, one can notice clearly that the chrome checks were supposed to be reflective with no motif in them.
If this is indeed a mistake, I should think PD try to correct it given their legendary attention to detail. So someone twitter Kaz about this please?