- 8,945

- F1 chimp land
- AnotherStory
That's interesting, though the 959 did compete in the dirt but Porsche didn't commit to a full season because Porsche was so far behind the others. It did win Dakar though. That's interesting about the Ferrari 288 though, and it makes a lot of sense to because I had always wondered why Ferrari would go for the MR layout when it hadn't been used since the Lancia 037 and was proven to be outdated by the 4WD cars.The 288GTO was not built for gravel rally, it was built for tarmac stages and for the track side of group B regulations (that never came to fruition).
While Group B is now almost exclusively known for its rally classification, what most people are either unaware of or have forgotten is that is was also going to be a track classification as well. Its for this track classification that the 288 was destined, and the 959 was originally designed.
Pssh, Enzo Ferrari would be disappointed that you wouldn't use his rally car!If I had a 288GTO the dirt would be the last place I'd have it.
It's a crying shame that even with all the games over the years that have featured Porsche not a single one has had 911 and 959 rally cars. I'll never understand how developers could ignore such an incredible racing history. EA's just letting it go to waste. I'd take the car in that picture over a 918 in a heartbeat.No, but this might've done alright
![]()
It never contested a full season but I think it entered a rally or 2, but Porsche designed it for Group B but never committed to a full WRC program once they figured out how off they were from the other cars. If I remember from the BBC documentary I saw on Group B I believe that was the case. It was originally designed for Group B though.The 959 entered the Paris Dakar, it never entered a WRC event.
That's interesting, though the 959 did compete in the dirt but Porsche didn't commit to a full season because Porsche was so far behind the others. It did win Dakar though. That's interesting about the Ferrari 288 though, and it makes a lot of sense to because I had always wondered why Ferrari would go for the MR layout when it hadn't been used since the Lancia 037 and was proven to be outdated by the 4WD cars.
It never contested a full season but I think it entered a rally or 2, but Porsche designed it for Group B but never committed to a full WRC program once they figured out how off they were from the other cars. If I remember from the BBC documentary I saw on Group B I believe that was the case. It was originally designed for Group B though.
The 959 (like the 288GTO) was original destined for the track side of Group B, which is why when teh switch to gravel happened for the 959 is was further behind, then Group B got canned and the Dakar was a logical move.
I've always had a soft spot for Group B as it was around at the time I was a teenager, still my earliest memory is watching Mk1 and 2 Escorts from my dad's shoulders during the RAC Rally of GB.
May I recommend...Yeah Group B is hard not to fall in love with. I wasn't around when it was happening but have really got into it the past 6 months or so and have completely fell for it. To me they are the most awe inspiring cars of all time and what they accomplished is just off the board (I'm fairly certain a Ford RS200 Evo could bet a Bugatti Veyron in a 1/4 mile drag race). Internet resources have been surprisingly hard to find on the subject so thanks, I'll have to dive into it a little more!
The 288GTO was not built for gravel rally, it was built for tarmac stages and for the track side of group B regulations (that never came to fruition).
While Group B is now almost exclusively known for its rally classification, what most people are either unaware of or have forgotten is that is was also going to be a track classification as well. Its for this track classification that the 288 was destined, and the 959 was originally designed.
The 959 is the only reason I care about GT getting the Porsche license at all![]()
Thanks I'll have to check that out!
The 959 was always headed for the track first and foremost (the DVDs I linked to cover both the 959, 288GTO and 288GTO Evo), switching to gravel when Group B track failed to take off (which was prior to the end of Group B WRC). The 961 was simply a more focused development of the 959 for Le Mans.Thanks I'll have to check that out!
As far as the Porsche goes, could there be a little confusion between the 959 and 961? The picture of the Porsche that won its class at Le Mans was designated the 961 while the Dakar winning car was designate the 959. I think I read online that the 959 was always designed for dirt. Could the 961 be what was intended for Group B road racing? Also I've heard a lot of times about the Ferrari 288 GTO supposedly being ready to compete in 1987 had the category continued on?
I see nobody has mentioned that the rev counter doesnt work....
And they still need to fix the broken rev counter on it -_-
You forgot to mention the screwed up rev counter that only goes between 800-1200 rpm in interior view
And the Speedo needs to be adjusted, it says that your driving 40km faster than the the real speed.
But maybe that's the way it works for real 2, being an old ferrari.![]()
Both the 288 GTO and the F40 were Group B cars.
The 959 is the only reason I care about GT getting the Porsche license at all![]()
I just recently watched chriss harris video on youtube driving this monster!This car was the Le Mans version which did compete and was bloody quick with the 956/962 engine! Both this and the rally version would be epic!!!
@perdy450 Was taking about the 961, not the 962. The 961 was a 4WD 959 based racer with a 962 engine.
Sorry guys my mistake!
The white and blue car in the smoke at the end of the vid. It's F40, and if I'm not mistaken is of the Michelotto GTE variety. The rarest and fastest of F40's.