- 12,026
- Australia
- I_Grayson_Fox_I
No no, I was referring to the new Windows 8 one. I've made my Win 7 like XP the day I bought it (complete with Quick Launch) xD
I'll be looking on hacks or ways to make windows 8 have the classic look.
No no, I was referring to the new Windows 8 one. I've made my Win 7 like XP the day I bought it (complete with Quick Launch) xD
If you're thinking I'm wrong, just stop and think about it for a second. When I initially learned of Mac OS X Lion and its new features I had the same kind of reaction. But really, when you're using an application, do you really need to see other windows? In some cases, yes, such as dragging files from one place to another. And you can still do that with Windows 8 with its Blender-esuqe screen splitting, as demonstrated in the video. But in most cases you want your active application to take up as much screen space as possible. In fact, all of the screen would be ideal. And don't need windows or some persistent taskbar to be able to enjoy seamless and fluid multitasking, as demonstrated by mobile operating systems. So why not give all of the screen to the active application?
terminator363The interface looks good for a tablet and nothing else.
Well I also wonder if they are counting on touch screen monitors taking off?
I agree with Bergauk. I wish things could just be simple. I mean for example, why did they get rid of the infamous "start" button, it's key to the "windows" interface. Honestly Windows 7 is fine why fix something that isn't even broken?
bergaukI prefer my monitor to be smudge free and 1080p. Not full of smudges and at some crap resolution like 1024x768.
I agree with Bergauk. I wish things could just be simple. I mean for example, why did they get rid of the infamous "start" button, it's key to the "windows" interface. Honestly Windows 7 is fine why fix something that isn't even broken?
I'm sure similar things were said from when Windows went from Win 3.1 to Windows 95.
Everything has to change at some point.
Or like from Win Xp to Vista??
This is exactly the same. Every single one I talk to is in one way or an other put off Win8. Win7 is finally a OS that works, and nearly just one year after they want to sell you now a cut back, simplifed version of an OS.
MS is losing massively on their phones that nobody wants, now the OS, well we going to see how long Ballmer can hold his place up there. Alot of people would be happy to see him go. First of all, mainly his investors.
On the touchscreen, it's not easier. I have a 23" screen and it's a pain to use it longer than 3 minutes as you have to pull out your arm in an uncomfortable way. It's just not as laied back as a mouse. And I don't think many people cut a hole in their table to fit in a screen
Sure MS will sell some Win8 with new Pc as they have always done, but remember Vista. Most PC resold with XP because nobody wanted Vista.
And the argument of change beeing inevitable, true, but history showed us that crap doesn't stick around (not my best analogy). If you want to change something it needs to be good.
I stick with Win7. Thanks. And Win8 will join the other failed 2000 products (Zune, Vista, ....)
Who said light pens are intuitive for casual users? I pointed out that light pens and touchscreens share a common defect, and the defect is one of the reasons why light pens never reached widespread use. This has nothing whatsoever to do with how intuitive its use may be (but note that a lot of users, myself included, often use a stylus with their tablet. That's a device that's very much like a light pen, except for the wire; light pens were introduced somewhat before bluetooth was).Thinking light pens are intuitive for casual users, oh okay.
Both of you missed the point about the average consumer. Which generally uses a computer long enough to check email and look at some youtube pictures. Maybe Google something.
Release Preview Now out.
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows-8/iso
Last lot of changes done before they release it.
Things I want changed or the option to change.
Ribbon GUI, I hate this thing, it is geared toward the computer illiterate.(I hope their is an option to change this back to the menu toolbar(but i doubt it).
Metro UI from what I read they were dropping this for desktops and making desktops more normal
Secure boot, This will make my job diagnosing issue hard since it will most likely prevent me loading linux on OEM machines.
Gnome 3 styled shutdown(you need to log out before you shut down)
Have same PC name as User Profile Name.
To shut down you still to it Gnome 3 style(Log out then shut down)
You can now have the same PC Name and user name.
No start(no option to enable)
Ribbon UI(still their enabling always show menus doesn't do diddly squat)
To shut down you still to it Gnome 3 style(Log out then shut down)
Running on VMware so unable to test secure boot
Metro still their, this will make it a very bad thing for gamers
Aero is on this version but it is very square and makes it look like it is from the 70's where squares was best design.
Buttons look very flat and 2D, Yeah Microsoft way to use new iGPUs, make things look 2D.
Runs aero on a WinSAT score of 2.0
Runs smooth on 2GB RAM, 1 core 2.7Ghz CPU (5.6 winsat score and 6.8 if I add an extra core) and 20GB SSD.