///M-Spec
Staff Emeritus
- 4,928
Originally posted by F-Body
Here we go, time to teach the riceboys all a lesson. Taking notes?
check out www.riceboypage.com for some good pointers guys, lolololol
Rollazn --- The Mustang is CRAP for putting a turbo in their car. TO begin with it's a piece of crap engine, a tiny little v-8, 4.6 liter. In the 80's and 90's the called em 5.0's, but they were always 4.6 liters. Mustangs suck, almost as much as every Honda ever made. I hate Mustangs, but still better than front wheel drive anything.
Famine --- The TT, ok, wow, it's got 225 HP, but how much Torque? 115? Not really sure but I bet the torque is WAY under the HP rating. And how much does it cost? It took them 17 years to get just a tit over my 1987 naturally aspirated 5.0 liter tuned port injection, and beat my 1987 by .5 on the 0-60. Now I fully realize that on the 0-60 and 1/4 mile times that half a second is an eternity. But my car cost like 11k brand new or something close to it, I paid 2500 for it. How much does that Audi cost? It's not a sports car at all, not whatsoever. It's a peppy little business mans car. And the Lotus, come on, that's a 100k plus car. For 50k I can get a Corvette with 450 HP, and nearly 500 ft/lbs torque. It would DESTROY your little TT and Lotus.
As far as that Ford goes, is that really a ford? Looks like a Honda. If it really is a Ford, which I believe you on, what year is it, and it must not have been released here in America. And it does not look stock at all, no headlights even.
I'd take a 2002 stock Z-28 in a race over anything Japan has to offer stock.
You don't know a damn thing about cars, do you?
M