U.F.O Encounters...

  • Thread starter Thread starter benzoboy
  • 81 comments
  • 2,323 views
Nah. It's much more likely to be aliens...
 
Famine
Nah. It's much more likely to be aliens...
I'm finally glad to see someone is talking some sense around here.

Planes, helicopters, iridium flares, that's just crazy talk!
 
This is why you don't give little kids trampolines.
 
I'm on the fence about wether they exist. Maybe they do, maybe they don't. I wouldn't mind seeing one one day.
 
Famine
Nah. It's much more likely to be aliens...
Anybody call me? My card says "Resident Alien". :sly:

P.S. No, I wasn't the one benzoboy saw. I stay close to the ground, usually.
 
How big is your trampoline? I've always wanted one.
 
Trampolines are all fun and games until you see a higher spot that in theory, you could jump from onto the trampoline. Let's just say, they don't spring you back from 2 stories high.



I'm not sure wether aliens exist...frankly, I don't care. As long as they don't scare kids and chase away my salmon, I'll leave them be.
 
BMW318_DRIFTER
I'm not sure wether aliens exist...frankly, I don't care. As long as they don't scare kids and chase away my salmon, I'll leave them be.

You have pet salmon? - do they attack the postman?
 
nah, It's more interested in the sales persons.



And aliens hopefully.
 
I've just noticed this:

benzoboy
I am a firm U.F.O believer myself, and my family are believers, and I really think I saw a U.F.O and I refuse to believe anything else.

That's kinda sad.
 
Has anyone noticed the ebay ad at the bottom of the screen?

"Alien UFO for Sale.

New & used Alien UFO. aff Check out the deals now!"

I would say thats conclusive proof of visiting Martians.
 
Does anyone know wtf is going on with my avatar? It says 'To this file please visit gtplanet.net' and it's very big
 
I like what the late, great Carl Sagan said about the subject:

He said that there is a very high mathematical probability that there are numerous intelligent life forms now in existence in our galaxy. The number of intelligent civilizations could, in fact, be fairly substantial.

However, he also said that it is even more mathematically probable that no intelligent life form ever makes contact with any other life form, ever, because of the very great distances that separate them.

In other words, nobody ever finds anybody else, ever.

I think he's very probably correct. Kind of sad, though, huh?

Also, a few years ago I watched a two-hour UFO special on the discovery channel in which a guy made a very convincing case for the idea that almost all the strange things we see in the sky are experimental U.S. aircraft. He cited examples of super-exotic programs that have either come and gone, or continue to be developed.

He said that these are "stealth dirigibles" that are not only radar-evasive, but have a skin-color-changing technology that can make them blend in with the daylight sky:

http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology/black_triangle_020805.html

http://www.ufoarea.com/main_triangles.html


He also went on at length about these very different exotic aircraft, saying that they've been in development for over two decades, and feature some sort of fantastic flux drive or something:

t2b7du.jpg


They supposedly have ridiculous performance characteristics, and are capable of acceleration, deceleration, and course-changing performance that generates always-fatal G-forces. They're virtually all remote-controlled, he claimed, because they'll kill any personnel that is on board.

These are the "lights" people have seen darting around in the sky in the Nevada desert and elsewhere, he says.

Our tax dollars at work. Personally, this guy's theory makes a ton more sense than the origin of these things being extra-terrrestrial.
 
Flame-returns
It looks normal to me. Spinning globe, right?

Yeah, I just fixed it, but I can't seem to find my old avatar, I miss my old one though :(
 
benzoboy
Yeah, I just fixed it, but I can't seem to find my old avatar, I miss my old one though :(


Yah, anyway.

Why do you refuse to believe anything else? What's the point in making this thread if you know what you saw and won't believe what others suggest?
 
If you follow the sagan theory and that it are all radio-controlled us- aircrafts, then how can you control them if you can't see them on radar and can't see them flying?
 
My brother once applied to be an air traffic controller for B2s.
 
. . .but he couldn't see them and they all crashed.
 
Zardoz
Also, a few years ago I watched a two-hour UFO special on the discovery channel in which a guy made a very convincing case for the idea that almost all the strange things we see in the sky are experimental U.S. aircraft.
What I've been telling people for years. Decades ago, people thought B-2 Bombers were UFOs(I guess it was a UFO to most people). No doubt in my mind that Roswell crash involved a military craft, also.
 
Of course it was a UFO, they didn't know what it was-- hence the U. F. O.ness of it.

UFO could be a new species of bird.
 
Someone brought up the fact that triangular "UFO" sightings are on the rise. These are not actually UFO but are military aircraft

An oft reported UFO shape is the triangle, a ship that looks a bit like a fat boomerang. This is not only an aerodynamic shape, amenable to travel within an airspace, the shape also supports gliding. What the shape does not support is anti-gravity, the ability of a ship to evade the Earth's gravity by creating its own gravitational field. Triangular UFO's are therefore not alien, but are simply a type of airship produced by the US government, in secret. Why the secrecy, and why are these ships so often mistaken for UFOs? This is the point, as though they were constructed to be another stealth plane, their ability to hover, pointing their jets downward, allows them to be mistaken for space ships that have anti-gravity capabilities.

Triangular UFO are being seen worldwide at this time, to build a debunking case against all the mass sightings also occurring worldwide, in case this debunking should be deemed necessary to stop a panic over the alien presence. Should such a panic occur, the US military would hold a press conference and unveil the new stealth plane, whereupon the media would announce with great fanfare that UFO's have been explained away! To prepare for such a debunking, these stealth planes are sent forth to coincide either with a sighting or slightly after. Media coverage of any mass sighting invariably includes either speculation that the UFO was this familiar triangle shape or statements to this effect. In matters of this cover-up, they've got themselves covered!
 
oosacker
Someone brought up the fact that triangular "UFO" sightings are on the rise. These are not actually UFO but are military aircraft

Yeah, like I said:

https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/showpost.php?p=1866954&postcount=47

Keep in mind that dirigibles were almost practical 70 years ago with primitive technology. They did quite well with no titanium or carbon fiber, for God's sake.

Fast-forward to today. Imagine the technology available now.

They've been around for a while. In 1989, over 1500 people phoned in reports of sitings of a huge, silent craft moving slowly down the Hudson River Valley. It was so low that they could see detail of the craft lit by ground lighting. This was not an alien spacecraft, folks. This was "one of ours". Who knows why they were flying it down the Hudson, but maybe they were testing its stealth capability.

I saw a video taken by a Russian citizen that showed one shimmering in the sky at very high altitude. It was the same color as the light blue sky, but you could just make it out. The video was shot in the mid-90s. That means these suckers are so developed, and so effective, they can overfly Russia with impunity.
 
Maybe they just painted the bottom blue, or "blurple", one of those crazy paintjobs ricers always have.
 
PS
Maybe they just painted the bottom blue, or "blurple", one of those crazy paintjobs ricers always have.
Come on, PS. That's World War II technology!
 
Works hella good though.
 
PS
Works hella good though.
Only if you're trying to fool 80 year olds, with poor eyesight.
 
Back