Unpopular Motorsport Opinions

  • Thread starter Liquid
  • 1,944 comments
  • 169,579 views
So, uhhh. You know these new cars that are better for racing...
RDT_20220428_0959437354624928466611580.png
 
What was so special about 2016 & obviously went missing a year later?
2017 was the introduction of the extra downforce cars with worse wake, so makes sense that there is a drop there.

As to why 2016 is so high, I have no idea. I don’t recall any changes from 2015-2016
 
The first 4 races of 2016 had a lot of first lap incidents, so depending on how overtakes are counted that could account for the figures. The first couple of rounds also has that short-lived and very unpopular elimination style qualifying format which means cars could have started futher down the grid then they normally would.
 
Even without significantly more passing, the cars are following closer so there is a higher sense of jeopardy? Albon holding off Ocon in Australia was a bit of an edge of seat 15 laps or so expecting Ocon would have got him...

Depends if the audience attention span is for more than just overtaking and drama...


I think the porpoising looks so stupid they should have some emergency test sessions to sort that out, already RBR claims one mechanical fault due to it... anyone think that it could escalate to be considered a safety issue - for the driver directly, or by causing a fault with brake or some safety related system - and require teams to work together to fix?
 
The simple fix for Porpoising is to raise the minimum ride height, but I doubt teams will want that because those not struggling with the issue will be punished to allow the other teams who are further back be closer.
 
So, uhhh. You know these new cars that are better for racing...
They are better for racing. Battles can actually last longer than a few laps now, the races have so far all been okay to very good. It's just that dirty air was part of the problem and not the actual problem itself. The cars are still far too big and too heavy, and the FIA has always ignored those issues until now.

Also, look at the increase between 2014 and 2016 despite there not being substantial regulation changes. Regulation changes always lead to the grid being less competitive in the first year or two. Even for the awful 2017-2021 regulations the amount of overtakes increased a lot after the first year.

And it should be noted that these regulations were extremely overhyped. DRS was never going to become obsolete. non-works teams were never going to have a shot at being world championship contenders, and there were never going to be different sets of drivers competiting for the win for each race. It was still going to be F1, just somewhat better.
 
Last edited:
16 introduced 3 tyre compounds, and also included the 2016 Chinese GP which holds the record for the most overtakes ever as Hamilton, Vettel, Raikkonen and Ricciardo had to battle from the back to the front in fast cars after a chaotic lap 1
The first 4 races of 2016 had a lot of first lap incidents, so depending on how overtakes are counted that could account for the figures. The first couple of rounds also has that short-lived and very unpopular elimination style qualifying format which means cars could have started futher down the grid then they normally would.
So Teams finding their feet really & discovering through trial & error what works.

I've been telling fringe F1 watchers that with the new regs being so different to what has come before, the development curve will never be steeper. In 6 races time, the running order we've seen so far could be turned on its head.
All it takes is that little discovery/tweak & any team could spring so far forward they're out of reach. A bit like Brawn did with the double-diffuser.

As for the porpoising, one would think a little research of the previous ground-effects era would uncover what the teams did back then to remedy the situation.
I've been watching races from that era (1978-1982) recently & haven't noticed anything as severe as what some teams are suffering this time around. Having said that, the front & rear wings back then were nowhere near as big as their current levels.
Depending on the circuit, some teams didn't even run with their front wings in place.
 
As for the porpoising, one would think a little research of the previous ground-effects era would uncover what the teams did back then to remedy the situation.
I think they probably never had to remedy the situation because they didn't get to the same situation consistently... They did have many situations that were considerable safety concerns.

The porpoising just looks like a safety consideration for causing unnecessary vibration and fatigue in the driver, it just looks wrong.

The simple fix for Porpoising is to raise the minimum ride height, but I doubt teams will want that because those not struggling with the issue will be punished to allow the other teams who are further back be closer.
In this interest of Fl racing as a sport the teams should act together .. also Ferrari are able to get great performance despite still being affected, so at the moment it perhaps not the biggest performance issue...

If they did raise the ride height, they will just have red bull style flexible wings / suspensions that will perform differently in the garage an on track... until the there are standard control components handed out for all Fl competitors to use the same suspension, spring and damper components and that's not likely for a while.
 
As for the porpoising, one would think a little research of the previous ground-effects era would uncover what the teams did back then to remedy the situation.
I've been watching races from that era (1978-1982) recently & haven't noticed anything as severe as what some teams are suffering this time around. Having said that, the front & rear wings back then were nowhere near as big as their current levels.
Depending on the circuit, some teams didn't even run with their front wings in place.
The cars ever since the hybrid era are massively long compared to what they were like 40+ years ago. That longer wheelbase can only exagerate the porpoise effect, i imagine, and especially when the downforce from the wings, even in 2022's reduced form, will also be much greater.

Wouldn't raising the (minimum) ride height just negate the ground effects effect?
 
Wouldn't raising the (minimum) ride height just negate the ground effects effect?
Correct, therein lies the catch-22 - the strength of the underfloor aero effect is what is causing the porpoising, but it is also the source of the car's aerodynamic performance. Every bit of ride height you give up for less porpoising also translates into less downforce, as the cars were built to run slammed to the floor.
 
The cars ever since the hybrid era are massively long compared to what they were like 40+ years ago. That longer wheelbase can only exagerate the porpoise effect, i imagine, and especially when the downforce from the wings, even in 2022's reduced form, will also be much greater.

Wouldn't raising the (minimum) ride height just negate the ground effects effect?
Ah yes, I didn't consider the length/wheelbase of the current cars.

1 - 1.5 metres longer now in some cases.
 
Late 1970s/early 1980s ground effect cars had skirts to seal the airflow. The issue with this is that when you run over a rumble strip it disturbs the sealed airflow, causing a sudden, gigantic loss in downforce at that moment. So, they could bring back skirts, but likely will have to either remove or flatten the curbs on circuits, since racing drivers tend to be creatures of habit. As it is now, it is a half-baked attempt at bringing back ground effect.

78_bel01-2.jpg
 
The simple fix for Porpoising is to raise the minimum ride height, but I doubt teams will want that because those not struggling with the issue will be punished to allow the other teams who are further back be closer.
All the FIA have to do is claim it's a change on safety grounds (loss of control of the car) and bang. It's changed and fixed
 
Last edited:
The 1999 Mercedes CLR, not the Toyota TS020, would have been the most iconic car from the 1999 race had it won LeMans and not crashed. It would have been remembered as the most beautiful car in LeMans history.

mercedes-benz_clr_1999_wallpapers_2_b.jpg


About 1/3 of the drivers in F1 are the best in the world. The rest wouldnt particularly stand out in other elite racing categories.

DRS is the best technical change to improve racing, ever.

More Road racing in NASCAR is dumb and has done nothing to improve the sport.

Danica Patrick was the best on-road female driver ever.

Currently Indycars are gutless and an embarrassment in terms of pace. 5-7 seconds slower then F1 is fine, 15+ is pathetic, even for a spec series.

If Indycar is ever going to revisit the 'glory' days it needs to grow out of being a spec series.

Josef Newgarden, not Colton Herta is America's best driver. Herta does have a higher ceiling though and could be better then Newgarden in 2 years.
 
Last edited:
Weight Ballast system > BoP

Seems BoP can become a victim of bias and sandbagging pre tests to not get hit with it for the race (I remember the controversy of the Ford GTE program from this). Not to mention the politics behind it all like what happened in Supercars with the Mustang and Commodore ZB in Gen2

If you construct a Weight Ballast like Super GT (weight added based on point total and to prevent intentional sandbagging, the weight is halved for the penultimate race and fully removed in the finale), you get a lot less politics and rule bias going on due to more concrete guidelines and still a racing season with more interesting results.

Shame it's criticised to death when the idea is mentioned to other series elsewhere (I can understand why you don't want it in something like F1 but not else where)
 
Last edited:
The 1999 Mercedes CLR, not the Toyota TS020, would have been the most iconic car from the 1999 race had it won LeMans and not crashed. It would have been remembered as the most beautiful car in LeMans history.
Well... it didn't win the race. And neither did the TS020 so what's stopping the CLR from being 'iconic'? Oh right, a near-fatal design flaw which makes it a laughable deathtrap instead. The TS020 also had a design flaw - there was a problem with the downforce acting on the wheel arch hence the triple punctures for all three Toyotas - but not severe enough to make it infamous rather than famous. If anything, the BMW V12 LMR should get more credit and fame for actually winning rather than two cars with inherent problems.

You might as well say that Ralf Schumacher would be considered an all-time F1 great had he won seven titles and not Michael. It just isn't true even if you want it to be.
 
Last edited:
Weight Ballast system > BoP

Seems BoP can become a victim of bias and sandbagging pre tests to not get hit with it for the race (I remember the controversy of the Ford GTE program from this). Not to mention the politics behind it all like what happened in Supercars with the Mustang and Commodore ZB in Gen2

If you construct a Weight Ballast like Super GT (weight added based on point total and to prevent intentional sandbagging, the weight is halved for the penultimate race and fully removed in the finale), you get a lot less politics and rule bias going on due to more concrete guidelines and still a racing season with more interesting results.

Shame it's criticised to death when the idea is mentioned to other series elsewhere (I can understand why you don't want it in something like F1 but not else where)
I really wish that V8 Supercars had weight penalties but it won't happen after the tyre allocation debacle from 2020. Teams and drivers complained that restricting the tyre allocation created "fake racing" and I'm sure the same complaints would arise if success ballast was a thing. I actually liked the tyre rules that were put in place for a while there because of the entertainment it provided. Seeing different drivers out front was good to see but Supercars are stuck in the past and the big teams have too much sway in the running of the championship, so they'll never adopt such ideas again to "improve the show".
 
Last edited:
Weight Ballast system > BoP

Seems BoP can become a victim of bias and sandbagging pre tests to not get hit with it for the race (I remember the controversy of the Ford GTE program from this). Not to mention the politics behind it all like what happened in Supercars with the Mustang and Commodore ZB in Gen2

If you construct a Weight Ballast like Super GT (weight added based on point total and to prevent intentional sandbagging, the weight is halved for the penultimate race and fully removed in the finale), you get a lot less politics and rule bias going on due to more concrete guidelines and still a racing season with more interesting results.

Shame it's criticised to death when the idea is mentioned to other series elsewhere (I can understand why you don't want it in something like F1 but not else where)
Weight Ballast worked really well in BTCC for years*, but they have 3 races on race day, so it may not work quite as well on a single, longer race format.

* they've dropped it this season as they've introduced a mild-hybrid system instead where in place of of ballast they are appointed less laps with available 'boost', which i feel is a bit more convoluted.
 
About 1/3 of the drivers in F1 are the best in the world. The rest wouldnt particularly stand out in other elite racing categories.
My guy really said this like Marcus ****ing Ericsson didn't just win the Indy 500 lmao
 
Haas' old livery was aesthetically (and I cannot stress that enough) the second best of the entire grid, behind Alfa Romeo, before they removed the blue.
 
My guy really said this like Marcus ****ing Ericsson didn't just win the Indy 500 lmao
He also seems to have forgotten about Takuma Sato winning the Indy 500..or Hulkenburg winning the 24 Hours of Le Mans.

This dude really be like:

Hot Takes.png
 
Josef Newgarden, not Colton Herta is America's best driver. Herta does have a higher ceiling though and could be better then Newgarden in 2 years.
Tough one to swallow. :lol:

Even tougher to argue seeing how Newgarden went from the bottom of the barrel team-wise all the way up to the top. If we could only test that scenario with the likes of Power retiring and Penske picking up Colton.
 

Latest Posts

Back