Some things are frowned upon, some are not. I dont think that we should have to change our preferences on what is accepted. As of right now, we aren't outlawing things because "they arent realistic" per say, but because it strays away from the PURE TUNE. eCheating, retro launching, etc are all techniques used OUTSIDE of you tune do get faster times. If it isnt dependent such as pure shift point, it is considered foreign and frowned upon, something I am COMPLETELY fine with. The wheel is frowned upon because it is not a feature available to all users (in a sense of everyone not having one) as opposed to a ds3 (something NO ONE has an excuse NOT to have). It is unwritten rules like this that keep tunes as honest as possible in comparison to Indy. Contrary to recent comment and popular belief, there is in fact some correlation between ssrx and indy. if an 8 second ssrx lemans is racing a poorly tuned 9 second aventador, best believe that the difference will be visible at both locations. as far as cheats, very few cheats applicable at speed test are effective online and the ones that ARE can be identified when used.
My point is that even though it has been downplayed as of late, there IS in fact a correlation between speed test and indy. If alternative means of times at ssrx are kept to a minimum, or monitered and kept under control, there would be a better comparison between the two locations.
Come to think of it, I'll go ahead and say that ssrx online (indy as well if 2 of the same drivetrain/model are racing) can and are being used as a tool to verify tunes or identify alternative means of timing(ESPECIALLY if a time is eccentric).
There was in fact a time where there was no speed test and it was all settled on the track. That is something that should NEVER change and should be what drag racing on gt5 is about FIRST AND FOREMOST. I like the speed test and route x feature, but I cannot call someone a fast drag racer just because their times are eccentric without running them. Its cool to just see how low you can get your times, but that should be a completely separate category than those who tune to COMPETE and actually RACE their cars. Perhaps a ETA leaderboard for fastest times and a PURE ETA leaderboard for the times with no alternative means used. PURE ETA tunes will be put to the test online, and the ownere/ tuners would know and invite it. Im not saying the faster time should win everytime (an 8.912 BE vs an 8.909 BE is a toss up online of course and up to the tree), but the leaderboards have always been close and competitive and should still be if categorized. A tuner who races another KNOWS whether or not that car is legit to its claimed time.
Just my opinion/ rebuttal 👍