VW's combustion engine of the future

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pebb
  • 17 comments
  • 1,380 views
Messages
16,737
England
Southampton, UK
Messages
Pebb--
Messages
Pebb
Source: AutoCar

1412661211431.jpg
141266121391.jpg


Volkswagen has just unveiled what it claims is the internal combustion engine of the future. Called the Combined Combustion System (or CCS for short), it mixes the most favourable characteristics of both petrol and diesel technology to make one low emissions, high efficiency power unit which runs on synthetic biofuel. Mounted in the nose of the recently facelifted Touran, the engine was introduced to the motoring press this week.

The CCS engine recognises the possibility that, in order to meet tightening emissions standards and ever higher demands for fuel efficiency, car makers may have to abandon conventional petrol and diesel engines in favour of a new type of motor altogether. VW's take on this engine of the future is an advanced four-cylinder based on the German car maker’s upcoming 2.0-litre common rail diesel engine due to head into production in 2008. It was designed to meld the homogeneous combustion and low nitrous oxide emissions of a typical small capacity petrol powerplant with the self ignition and low fuel consumption properties of a modern day diesel – the aim being to combine the best attributes of each.

Using the latest piezo injector technology from German electronics specialist Bosch, the CCS engine is able to begin the combustion process within each cylinder much earlier than in existing diesels, which tend to start shortly after the piston reaches top dead centre. The fuel mixture that enters each of the CCS' cylinders is fully vaporised and ignites over a larger area than it might in a conventional engine. in much the same way as a modern day direct injection petrol unit does. This early firing reduces the build up of nitrous oxide and particulates caused by non-vaporised fuel and hot spots within the cylinder – both big drawbacks of today’s diesel engines according to Christoph Kohnen, who was closely involved in the development of the new engine at Volkswagen’s R&D centre located in Braunschweig, Germany.

Because the fuel mixture is ignited over a longer period, the CCS unit also proves more economical. No hard and fast figures have been put forward just yet, but Volkswagen claims that consumption is improved by around five per cent on the European combined cycle test, which involves a mixture of city and motorway driving.

To ensure the CCS process could be achieved, Volkswagen has worked closely with German based Choren Industries to develop a new synthetic fuel. This fuel is a CO2-neutral biomass mixture containing no petrol or diesel, but rather created using forest or industrial waste as well as bio-degradable rubbish, animal waste and specially planted crops. Unlike other propulsion technologies being pushed at the moment, it does not require any dramatic alteration to existing infrastructure. “The fuel can be delivered through normal filling stations,” says Kohnen.

Volkswagen is predicting the CCS engine could be ready for inclusion in production cars from early next decade, if current initiatives to make synthetic fuel available on a large scale come to fruition. Together with the prototype we drove, VW also has turbocharged versions on test beds producing output figures similar to those of existing diesel units. The next step is to combine the CCS engine with electric drive to create a hybrid that Kohnen predicts will set a whole new standard for achievable environmental sustainability.
 
So.... Are we getting any of them over hear in the states?

Not that E85 has taken off yet, this is just another car that will be a somewhat "one of a kind" in terms of availability for fuel.
 
Source:The next step is to combine the CCS engine with electric drive to create a hybrid that Kohnen predicts will set a whole new standard for achievable environmental sustainability.

Why...why does every car company feel they need a hybrid? Do none of them understand that it's a crap band-aid solution just waiting to bite them on the ass when it comes to end-of-life for the product? Are they so sucked in by their own marketing -- and their competitors' marketing -- that they just don't care any more? VW comes up with a great idea for fuel economy, and then they hamper it with by slapping a battery to it rather than let the idea stand on its own. They take one step forward, and smack their head straight into the signpost.
 
5% more efficient...throw on a turbo on it and it makes power similar to a diesel...Why?
 
Why...why does every car company feel they need a hybrid? Do none of them understand that it's a crap band-aid solution just waiting to bite them on the ass when it comes to end-of-life for the product? Are they so sucked in by their own marketing -- and their competitors' marketing -- that they just don't care any more? VW comes up with a great idea for fuel economy, and then they hamper it with by slapping a battery to it rather than let the idea stand on its own. They take one step forward, and smack their head straight into the signpost.

At least car manufacturers are addressing the problem of fuel consumption. Would you rather them not do anything at all? I don't see that solving any problems.
 
At least car manufacturers are addressing the problem of fuel consumption. Would you rather them not do anything at all? I don't see that solving any problems.

I'm all for improvements, but 5% for a hybrid is just lame, and hybrids suck to begin with. They are, flat out, not the solution. I don't know what is, but anything that leaves an even greater chemical mess at the end of its life than a regular car is not a step forward.
 
I'm all for improvements, but 5% for a hybrid is just lame, and hybrids suck to begin with. They are, flat out, not the solution. I don't know what is, but anything that leaves an even greater chemical mess at the end of its life than a regular car is not a step forward.

That may be true, but I believe hybrids will pave the way to a better solution. They may not be the best vehicles on the road but that 5% will continue to increase as time moves on. Many times, the set solution wont just appear out of thin air, it will take time and improvements. As we can already see, hybrids have already jump-started research and development of other alternate powered vehicles which may even result in the abolishment of the hybrid all together. Although I cannot be certain, I can almost guarantee the hybrid vehicle of fuel/electricity will eventually fade away, but you cannot rule it out as something that has shaped the way the world thinks about fuel consumption. And when it does disappear, it will be because of a new technology that it probably helped create.
 
Does it matter how efficient hybrids are? They have no soul, no driving pleasure, and that's enough for me.
 
To be quite honest, that is probably the reason why many people are turned off by them, Jim. I think in time though, that they will improve but right now they are only being sucked up by treehuggers (the bad rep the Prius got regarding gas mileage estimates doesn't help with sales either). This is sad because I believe the main factor that will excel advances in hybrid technology will be societies acceptance to the product. Yet that will involve improving the "soul and driving pleasure" of which none of the current hybrids have any!

I believe Lexus (well....Toyota) is trying to move in that direction with their GS450h rear drive sedan. I think eventually we will see more hybrids that aim their selling point on sportiness rather than the advantages of the hybrid. If these cars begin to preform well, people will begin to buy them more and more.
 
The GS450H recently placed last in a C&D comparo, because it was just too, well, boring. sure, it puts up a good accelleration number, (with a fully charged battery...shudder to think what it'd be like on a mountain road, drained) but it doesn't give the driver enough control, and it doesn't speak to the driver as they'd like.

A manual transmission, 5.0L V8 Lexus would be more my style, and many others. Which is the problem. Hybrids must be fun to drive.

Which is why I like this Vee-Dub without it's hybrid drivetrain. It should be fun to drive.
 
The GS450H recently placed last in a C&D comparo, because it was just too, well, boring. sure, it puts up a good accelleration number, (with a fully charged battery...shudder to think what it'd be like on a mountain road, drained) but it doesn't give the driver enough control, and it doesn't speak to the driver as they'd like.

I'm sure that's mostly because it was a Lexus. ;) They're boring by definition.

I don't really see any proper technology descending directly from hybrids. They're about as useful as steam power: you can improve on it, that's for sure, but it's not the correct answer. Fuel-cells are no better: same biohazard travelling with you in the car, only bigger. I don't pretend to know the answer, but I think some combination of "hyrdogen" and "combustion" is far superior than "battery" and "anything".
 
I'm sure that's mostly because it was a Lexus. ;) They're boring by definition.

I don't really see any proper technology descending directly from hybrids. They're about as useful as steam power: you can improve on it, that's for sure, but it's not the correct answer. Fuel-cells are no better: same biohazard travelling with you in the car, only bigger. I don't pretend to know the answer, but I think some combination of "hyrdogen" and "combustion" is far superior than "battery" and "anything".

:lol: ...that one should be in the dictionary.

----

re: technology trickle-down. I can see some. Engine shut-off technology, power-conserving electric airconditioning and accessories that don't take power directly from the crank. We're already seeing electric steering... although I absolutely hate all electric boosted systems I've driven so far, I believe they could make them better in the future.

But the one accessory I'd really like to see in mass-production is the assist-motor/starter/regeneration system, paired with the aforementioned engine-shut off or cylinder deactivation system.
 
:lol: ...that one should be in the dictionary.

It almost is:
http://www.dealerfinder.com/lexus/or/boring/

niky
re: technology trickle-down. I can see some. Engine shut-off technology, power-conserving electric airconditioning and accessories that don't take power directly from the crank. We're already seeing electric steering... although I absolutely hate all electric boosted systems I've driven so far, I believe they could make them better in the future.

But the one accessory I'd really like to see in mass-production is the assist-motor/starter/regeneration system, paired with the aforementioned engine-shut off or cylinder deactivation system.


I still see that as a hybrid type system. Any time you try to store power in electrical form, you need a battery. Until large-scale batteries are drastically changed in their design, they'll never win favor with me.

Electric steering is totally unrelated from hybrid technology, in that it is a motor with electricity provided by the engine, which is acting as a generator in this sub-system.
 
Sometimes I wonder why cars aren't just one giant alternator with a big capacitor attached for starting the car and driving it the first small distance.
 
I still see that as a hybrid type system. Any time you try to store power in electrical form, you need a battery. Until large-scale batteries are drastically changed in their design, they'll never win favor with me.

Electric steering is totally unrelated from hybrid technology, in that it is a motor with electricity provided by the engine, which is acting as a generator in this sub-system.

You don't always need a battery. A good idea is to create a supercapacitor, to store just enough charge for maybe 10-15 seconds of assist. It may carry a weight penalty, but not as big a one as a full-hog hybrid electric battery pack.

I'm still waiting for word on developments in the field of capacitors. I do share your sentiments on batteries, though... they're still not good enough for automotive use.
 
Well I suppose this is one of the few "hot topics" I haven't thrown my hat in with, so here I go...

I applaud Volkswagen's strides to improve both fuel economy and reduce the need for fossil fuels with an engine like this, but I do have my own personal concerns. First of all, the possibilities of this engine are indeed great in nations that have been modernized and have the capacity to produce fuels such as these. However, given that only one company has what basically amounts to a monopoly on the process by which this fuel is created, that indeed does serve as a problem.

One other thing to note is that apparently Volkswagen wants these cars in service by sometime in the next decade, within shooting-range of the full-onslaught of diesel power in America, hydrogen power becoming a reality, and a further increase in not only E85 fuels for gasoline engines, but also assorted diesel alternatives as well.

---

On the note of hybrid power, I believe we are all well-informed how much I hate hybrid power, so I'm not about to rant there.

...IMO, we would all be better off cutting out the floorboards of our cars and doing it Flintstones style...

YABBA DABBA DOO!
 
This seems like yet another fuel that will 'need' to be stocked at all petrol stations. So that's unleaded, premium unleaded, Diesel, E85, Hydrogen, LPG and this new stuff.

Brilliant.

Untill a 'standard' future fuel is decided on (Bio-ethanol?) no environmentally cars are going to be practical.
Sometimes I wonder why cars aren't just one giant alternator with a big capacitor attached for starting the car and driving it the first small distance.
Because you would never get 100% efficiency. Ever.
 
You don't always need a battery. A good idea is to create a supercapacitor, to store just enough charge for maybe 10-15 seconds of assist. It may carry a weight penalty, but not as big a one as a full-hog hybrid electric battery pack.

I'm still waiting for word on developments in the field of capacitors. I do share your sentiments on batteries, though... they're still not good enough for automotive use.

A capacitor, by definition, is a battery. A short-charge one, but still a battery, and still has the same problems all batteries have (weight, enviromental unfriendliness). There are other ways to store energy (flywheel), but I'd rather just skip the whole band-aid thing and go right the proper solution...whatever that is.


YSSMAN
...IMO, we would all be better off cutting out the floorboards of our cars and doing it Flintstones style...

YABBA DABBA DOO!

If things continue to progress at this current rate, we'll be doing that 50 years from now. :grumpy:
 
Back