What do wish for more of in GT4 that there wasn't enough of in the otherGranTurismos?

[Solid Lifters]

First off, I don't want to hear any of this stupid "physical damage" crap. If PD ever put that in a GT game, I won't be buying it.

I would like to see some new features like maybe a horn or high beam headlights for signaling other drivers of your presence, flame effects when downshifting and maybe an inside camera angle.

What I want to see is the return of a second 3rd person view. Some cars in GT3 where just too tall to see over. Finally, I would like to see the return of racing modifications of most regular cars.

I am very glad to hear that used cars and muscle cars are making a comeback to the GT game series.

 

[CDailey]

Originally posted by Solid Lifters
First off, I don't whant to hear any of this stupid "physical damage" crap. If PD ever put that in a GT game, I won't be buying it.

I would like to see some new features like maybe a horn or high beam headlights for signaling other drivers of your presence, flame effects when downshifting and maybe an inside camera angle.

What I want to see is the return of a second 3rd person view. Some cars in GT3 where just too tall to see over. Finally, I would like to see the return of racing modifications of most regular cars.

I am very glad to hear that used cars and muscle cars are making a comeback to the GT game series.

Why wouldn't you buy the game if PD put damage in it?

 

[Squid]

optional clutch
More cars
old cars
used cars
more parts
licenced parts
some damage not to much though

 

[Solid Lifters]

Originally posted by Integra Type R
Why wouldn't you buy the game if PD put damage in it?

It would be such a tremendous annoyance to put damage in. Did you like it in GT2? I didn't. The AI cars run into you so terribly, they would cast you and themselves out in a close race constantly. Who really wants that?

How about the car manufacturers? They would have a say about how well their cars respond to damage. This would be a nightmare for PD and would delay the game needlessly.

Further more, GT is a game simulation about cars and car racing. To simiulate a real crash your vehicle would be completely demolished the first time you would hit a wall. That's no fun!

 

[CDailey]

There was no physical damage in GT2

 

[VenomFX220]

There was "physical damage" in GT2, but you couldn't see it. This, I think, was only available in arcade mode, though.

 

[Goumindong]

Originally posted by Integrale
no, not the Audi S4,

Lancia released a Delta S4 in the mid 80's that competed in Group B rallying, accelerating it would thrash anything as it could do 0-60 on gravel in 2.6 seconds

type it into google and you will find a pic I'm certain of it

Inte

Yea, it was a shame that the Lancia got thrashed by the quattro.

A summary of Group B rallying looks like this...

1980 Quattro wins
1981 Quattro wins
1982 Quattro wins
1983 Quattro wins
1984 Quattro wins
1985 Quattro wins

Though in 85 ther Pugeot did do very well i think it was the driver cup that they won, but lost the manufacturer cup to the Audi because of car failure.

The Lancia may have done 2.6 to 60 on gravel, but the S1 Quattro did 2.8, and the Pugeot did 2.0. So it didnt exactly thrash the competition, in fact i think it might have taken home one trophy in the years that it raced against the audi.


BTW, you wan the 1984 sport quattro road car, the 1985 S1 Quattro pikes peak/rally, and the 1984 Sport Quattro rally car. I have some video if youd like to see it.

http://www.quattro.ca/media.html Last video on the list(quattro2.mpg). About 20% through the film you will see just how well the lancia does against the Quattro rally car (not even the S1 monster).



As for the S4 sucking, it most certianly does not, its no 85 sport quattro, but it does not suck.

 

[kin]

lancia delta ****ing integrale...and a 87 honda accord hatchback LX-I..yea..