I think the issue that everyone is overlooking here isn't the cost itself, but the fact that regardless of if it's a $10, $1000 or $10000 fix, the 🤬 idiot that
did it or their insurer should be paying,
not me.
I could scan in the detailled quote breakdown, for costs, but that's besides the point. Most of the costs associated with this are labour for removal of the front bumper and trim parts around the fender so that a proper paint blending job can be done so that 2 years or more from now I don't end up with a part faded paintjob that looks something like this:
and makes it obvious to anyone that looks that the car has had new parts fitted, or covers parts of the window trim and mirrors in overspray.
I know there's plenty of fenders in junkyards all over the place, but the chances of finding an NA fender in as good condition, with no door dings etc, etc. is slim to none. I have no intention of patching this car up with substandard parts.
Similarly, pulling the dents out will still leave marks, look closely at the second photo I posted, that crease in the wheel arch where the paint has split isn't just going to "pull out".
On a positive note, I've just called my insurers, and folks out here in California seem to have the right idea, if I claim for this, since it was a "not-at-fault" claim, they can't increase my premium at renewal time! 👍
That's a lot different to the UK where a simple claim for having your stereo nicked results in a premium hike that makes you feel like you've been raped and costs you more in the long run than paying for the damage yourself, leaving you to question why you pay the money-grabbing vultures insurance money in the first place. 👎
So it'll get fixed, like new, by whoever the insurers opt for and not look like this when it's done!