What livery content is considered "offensive" or "illegal"?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nuu1212
  • 31 comments
  • 12,140 views
nuu1212

nuu1212

(Banned)
Messages
282
Germany
Germany
Just reading the "manual" on liveries and wondering which kind of content could be considered "offensive" or "illegal".
I'm about to put a soft pin-up onto my GT-R. Just lingerie in black&white. No nakedness, but quite a sexy pose...
Is that already crossing a line? Don't want to be banned, obviously.

What else to consider? Is e.g. a fake Tesla logo "illegal" due to copyright?
 
Whatever they deem inappropriate. What you are suggesting is likely to get removed I'd say but you can never be 100% sure. It's the same with whether you'd be banned for it, something like that could just result in it getting removed, without you getting banned and it's not like people go around telling stories of being banned but that doesn't mean it doesn't happen either.
 
You should be gud to post that. I’ve seen worse on the game.
It’s not like safe space Forza where simple girls in bikini is considered inappropriate and gets reported and banned
 
Lebowski
Here's a good and clearly logical way to view it. The game can be - and is - played by very young children. Is the livery suitable for all ages? If you have to think about it, then its not.
Click to expand...
As it is black vector graphics only, the lingerie might easily be mistaken for dirt :rolleyes:. The eyes should be OK with all age groups:lol:
ARTAsean
Please for the love of god, upload your pinup woman. I need a break from the torrent of pre-pubescent anime girls that these freaks pollute the front page with every day.
Click to expand...
Working on it...
 
ARTAsean
Please for the love of god, upload your pinup woman. I need a break from the torrent of pre-pubescent anime girls that these freaks pollute the front page with every day.
Click to expand...

I agree. I like anime and all, but the type that fetishes oversexualized pre-teen girl characters is disturbing and indicative of a person's actual interests. Get outta here with that crap Chester.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Winnie847
I agree. I like anime and all, but the type that fetishes oversexualized pre-teen girl characters is disturbing and indicative of a person's actual interests. Get outta here with that crap Chester.
Click to expand...
Keep it PG in my opinion. I'm not sure 15yo me would have given a second thought to the younger kids playing though.
Winnie847
indicative of a person's actual interests.
Click to expand...
That isn't true. Even the most depraved/violent fantasies are common compared to the number of people who act, or would ever act, on them. The gap is so wide, trying to use fantasies to predict behaviour is a futile exercise. The vast majority of people who have disturbing fantasies are not at risk of ever acting on them, or wanting to act on them, under any circumstances.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Woodybobs
Keep it PG in my opinion. I'm not sure 15yo me would have given a second thought to the younger kids playing though.

That isn't true. Even the most depraved/violent fantasies are common compared to the number of people who act, or would ever act, on them. The gap is so wide, trying to use fantasies to predict behaviour is a futile exercise. The vast majority of people who have disturbing fantasies are not at risk of ever acting on them, or wanting to act on them, under any circumstances.
Click to expand...

Kind of like how plenty of dudes who watch child porn never actually have sex with kids, am I right?

I guess it’s all cool in that case, smh.

Also, I didn’t mention acting on the fantasy and only used the words “actual interests.” I stand by that.
 
Winnie847
Kind of like how plenty of dudes who watch child porn never actually have sex with kids, am I right?
Click to expand...
No. That is not fantasy. You may as well say that getting pleasure from watching a real murder is the same as getting pleasure from watching The Sopranos.

Winnie847
Also, I didn’t mention acting on the fantasy and only used the words “actual interests.” I stand by that.
Click to expand...
I get that. It's still true that a person's fantasies tell us nothing about a person's "actual interests".
 
nuu1212
Just reading the "manual" on liveries and wondering which kind of content could be considered "offensive" or "illegal".
I'm about to put a soft pin-up onto my GT-R. Just lingerie in black&white. No nakedness, but quite a sexy pose...
Is that already crossing a line? Don't want to be banned, obviously.

What else to consider? Is e.g. a fake Tesla logo "illegal" due to copyright?
Click to expand...
I actually have an itasha car that has that pose (but anime girl instead of real girl and put it on the roof of my itasha car) and to avoid getting reported, didn't share it in game.

So should you share it, I think it's more likely to getting reported just like the anime decals (which reminds me of that one person that kinda ranted about anime decals). But should you not share it, I think you should be fine.
 
Woodybobs
No. That is not fantasy. You may as well say that getting pleasure from watching a real murder is the same as getting pleasure from watching The Sopranos.


I get that. It's still true that a person's fantasies tell us nothing about a person's "actual interests".
Click to expand...

You’re doing some impressive kind of mental gymnastics to dance around a very basic point I made. If you’re into oversexualized anime characters that resemble little girls, you’re probably into little girls. Act on it or not, conscious or subconscious, still a perv deep down.
 
I'd imagine the main thing they are worried about is swastikas, specific parts of the male anatomy, and explicit language.
 
Winnie847
You’re doing some impressive kind of mental gymnastics to dance around a very basic point I made. If you’re into oversexualized anime characters that resemble little girls, you’re probably into little girls. Act on it or not, conscious or subconscious, still a perv deep down.
Click to expand...

Your observation is heavily flawed if someone being into that automatically makes them into actual little girls as you imply. Its right in the same vein as automatically accusing anyone that isn't a kid watching and being into My Little Pony a "Pedophile". Not sure how this guy is doing "Mental Gymnastics" when you are making a point based less on fact and seemingly more on a popular stereotype. Where even is the factual basis for such a idea?
 
Last edited:
RACECAR
You're observasion is heavily flawed if someone being into that automatically makes them into actual little girls as you imply. Its right in the same vein as automatically accusing anyone that isn't a kid watching and being into My Little Pony a "Pedophile". Not sure how this guy is doing "Mental Gymnastics" when you are making a point based less on fact and seemingly more on a popular stereotype. Where even is the factual basis for such a idea?
Click to expand...
How do I heart react comments on GTPLANET?
 
I wouldn't be too concerned tbh mate. I've done quite a few 420 designs that I've had a few warnings for but never any further action. Had quite a few that are still up there too so don't think they're overly strict.
 
Winnie847
You’re doing some impressive kind of mental gymnastics to dance around a very basic point I made. If you’re into oversexualized anime characters that resemble little girls, you’re probably into little girls. Act on it or not, conscious or subconscious, still a perv deep down.
Click to expand...
We can't make any assumptions about a person based on their thoughts or fantasies alone. It seems logical to think "if a person fantasises about x, they must be into x", but the evidence (for fantasies such as these) shows the opposite is much more likely to be correct. Many exclusively straight men have homosexual fantasies but have never met a man in real life that they are attracted to. Similarly, most people who have/have had incest fantasies have never been attracted to a member of their family. It may well be that the taboo is what excites rather than the actual subject.

I have limited knowledge of anime and even less about this type of anime. Correct me if I'm wrong but aren't these characters usually much older than they look or act?

I must confess that I got interested in this because I periodically read and watch science fiction. I'm specifically interested in the world a creator imagines for the future. A common theme is that a person's thoughts are enough to make assumptions about them. Considering how much of our lives are lived online we are now in an age where huge amounts of data can be collected on an individual and used against them. It's important that this type of information is not used to start witch hunts. The best way to do that is to refute common misconceptions based on stereotypes with collected evidence. Worryingly, the Chinese government (amongst others) has started using this collected data against its citizens. It'll be interesting to see how far they take it.
 
Last edited:
tbh some liveries also just get deleted by random. I did an E30 replica livery and it was taken down after a few days but I just re-uploaded it and it's been there ever since :odd:
 
ARTAsean
pre-pubescent anime girls
Click to expand...
Most of those girls are probably 15 or older. The 'anime is lolicon' stereotype only applies to a very limited section of pure unadulterated degeneracy (cougheromangasenseicough) and doesn't represent the core anime audience. Modern anime's art style tends to make characters look a bit younger than they actually are, which can be attributed to Japan's love of cuteness. Basically, if they look like middle schoolers, they're often high schoolers, or even recently graduated in extreme cases. And aside from Kazunokota's liveries back in FIA S1-2, I haven't seen much that much lewding going on either.

Long story short, I think you overestimate the population of freaks out there.
 
While this is a "fascinating" "discussion" on sexuality, paraphilias and cartoons, we do have more appropriate forums and threads for both.

Let's get back to the question of what qualifies as potentially sanctionable material for GT Sport liveries, please.
 
Famine
While this is a "fascinating" "discussion" on sexuality, paraphilias and cartoons, we do have more appropriate forums and threads for both.

Let's get back to the question of what qualifies as potentially sanctionable material for GT Sport liveries, please.
Click to expand...

lol..love the quotations.
 
Crazy Taylor
Red bull liveries ;).
Click to expand...

I'm gonna guess the whole idea of them being played out? (which isn't helped by the "Lets slap an F1 livery on a GT Car" folks, which most of the time never ends well). Also, you'll probably hate me :lol:
 
RZQSPEED
Is that the reason why Mazda wasn't able to get into the World Finals with @VP_Bellof956 and CristianoSa?
Click to expand...
Kazuzo's hiatus appeared to be his own decision and had nothing to do with the risque livery, which was still on his car when he popped back in to do a final season race. Hence why I said prior to a chunk of the thread getting purged that Nuu should be fine as long as we're not talking stupid levels of lewd.
 
JayOTT
Kazuzo's hiatus appeared to be his own decision and had nothing to do with the risque livery, which was still on his car when he popped back in to do a final season race. Hence why I said prior to a chunk of the thread getting purged that Nuu should be fine as long as we're not talking stupid levels of lewd.
Click to expand...
I was originally thinking way before this thread appeared that he disappeared for whatever reason, which hampered Bellof and Cristiano's World Final Journey (but hey, at least they are Nations Finalists!) But because of your comment, I ended up thinking about his livery instead.
 

Latest Posts

Back