They're under 'Other PC sims' because there are quite a few good ones that outrank GT for realism.
Also i posted that before the poll was put up. In accordance with my graph i put <80%. But i would have put the same for iRacing so its inconsequential.
less than 80%. Graphically and Driving physics on track is close to realism but pretty much everything else dissapoints so far, and will continue to do so after release. Anyone who thinks things like reverse light simulation will improve is a fool. Kaz cares not for reverse lights...which raises the question why does he care about brake lights?
80 - 89 % ... i think theres no way a game can reach 99% realism , not at home .. maybe a super freak simulator , with TRACKIR , 12 widescreen monitors , and hydraulic cage... with a logitech G200 ..
less than 80%. Graphically and Driving physics on track is close to realism but pretty much everything else dissapoints so far, and will continue to do so after release. Anyone who thinks things like reverse light simulation will improve is a fool. Kaz cares not for reverse lights...which raises the question why does he care about brake lights?
if you´re racing from exterior view, it would be weird the brake lights not work , the same way its weird when you got reverse without the reserve lights.. but how many times you got reverse in a race? I think thats the major point here...
Anyway, i think reverse lights will be in GT5... its such a easy thing to implement..
"Im hoping our players wont be caught up with minor details. If they pick at every little thing, nobody will be satisfied. Its the overall evolution that will impress. Skidmarks (reverse lights in this case) should be of no concern. (He says with a laugh)."
- Kazunori Yamauchi
"Im hoping our players wont be caught up with minor details. If they pick at every little thing, nobody will be satisfied. Its the overall evolution that will impress. Skidmarks (reverse lights in this case) should be of no concern. (He says with a laugh)."
- Kazunori Yamauchi
"Im hoping our players wont be caught up with minor details. If they pick at every little thing, nobody will be satisfied. Its the overall evolution that will impress. Skidmarks (reverse lights in this case) should be of no concern. (He says with a laugh)."
- Kazunori Yamauchi
I voted for 80-89% of simulation, because it's somewhat hardcore and challenging but not as much as absolutely anoraky and rock-hardcore racing sims (See: Rfactor, iRacing, Live for Speed). And those ones are 95% of simulation. Unless you can get a real car on a real track you'll never reach the 100% mark.
We do not know that the physics engine will be the same as in the demo, unless you have some special information that the rest of us do not! I did read the question and still will not vote until I play GT5 and can formulate an educated assumption on GT5 physics. Actually I do not really like your condesending attitude so I wont vote in your little poll at all!
I highly doubt PD will throw away a physics system that took them 3 years to make. Plus I'm pretty sure Kaz already confirmed the TT physics for the full version of GT5.
We do not know that the physics engine will be the same as in the demo, unless you have some special information that the rest of us do not! I did read the question and still will not vote until I play GT5 and can formulate an educated assumption on GT5 physics. Actually I do not really like your condesending attitude so I wont vote in your little poll at all!
. But yeah, I've never raced, nor even driven a real car, so my opinion is maybe worthless.
(I sure need reminding sometimes too 
