Which supra is better

The RZ is a lot better, though the SZ-R might be fun if you enjoy N/A cars.
 
The SZ-R for me has a substantial problem with understeer and so wears the front tires at a very much higher rate than the rears(one of the worst GT5 cars I've driven in this regard). I expected it to handle a bit better having less power but have found the RZ to be actually much better balanced as well as obviously being faster in a straight line.

This is in stock trim, you can probably improve it substantially with some proper tuning.
 
The SZ-R for me has a substantial problem with understeer and so wears the front tires at a very much higher rate than the rears(one of the worst GT5 cars I've driven in this regard). I expected it to handle a bit better having less power but have found the RZ to be actually much better balanced as well as obviously being faster in a straight line.

This is in stock trim, you can probably improve it substantially with some proper tuning.

I have both and I use the S ZR for drifting no setup or anything because the back end just slides! So I will use the rz for track racing
 
The SZ-R for me has a substantial problem with understeer and so wears the front tires at a very much higher rate than the rears(one of the worst GT5 cars I've driven in this regard). I expected it to handle a bit better having less power but have found the RZ to be actually much better balanced as well as obviously being faster in a straight line.

This is in stock trim, you can probably improve it substantially with some proper tuning.

Could it be that the understeer is more noticeable because you don't have access to that snap power oversteer available with the turbo motor and the skinny tires' inability to cash those torquey checks?
 
Back