Why Did'nt They Do The Same Setup As GT2 ??

  • Thread starter Thread starter AuToNoMy
  • 37 comments
  • 3,021 views
even worse

They do offer challenge, and more events than what's offered in A-Spec. I could care less about money, XP, or prize cars. I have no problem gaining credits, and I'm already at level 40 (A-spec). So, for me it's just more races to enjoy.

After all, GT5 is supposed to be about the enjoyment of driving a large selection of cars around various tracks.

Works for me, anyway.



;)
 
10
The most annoying thing is not being able to save 3 tunes for each car.

I noticed that as well a while back. They had it in the prologue, how hard could it be to add it back in??? :banghead:
 
They couldn't have it so you go to the dealer to tune because then yuo wouldn't be able to tune cars like, the Hommel, Delorean, Plymouths or anything like that
 
I also liked the BHP class of races too...

Sure you can have lightweight cars that make mincemeat of it sometimes. But knowing that your opposition were in 400bhp cars for instance, or 200bhp cars means that you can buy a 200sx 200bhp race it, then tune it and see if it can be usable at 400bhp class or whether you have to buy a proper 400bhp car.

Thats what i enjoyed s much. GT3/4/5 do away with all of that:/
 
I see no reason to use the comparatively mediocre GT4 system for saving tunes when the PS3's natural abilities (hard drive, PSN) would make the system used in GT3 that much better than it already was over the GT4 system.

The reason for compare is the mediocre system of GT5, and you cant call a system either.

Also i almost forgot the turbo stage 4!!, for the skylines obviusly.
 
Last edited:
The reason for compare is the mediocre system of GT5, and you cant call a system either.
Yes, the GT4 system is better than having nothing like GT5. That doesn't mean PD should implement the GT4 system when the GT3 system was much better and would take just as much effort to actually put in.
 
Back