'Let he who is without sin cast the first stone' - never anything was better said than that.
I agree with many people here. Buying a CD without knowing how much you will like its contents is a major waste of money. So, nothing wrong (well, entirely wrong) with the downloading+trying+deleting+buying process. People want to be sure of what they buy before they do, and I don't blame them, as money, as far as I know (somebody back me up on this one please

) doesn't grow on trees. I want to be sure as well. The only two groups I buy the CD blindfolded/hearfolded are U2 and Pink Floyd. I already know they won't disappoint me... It might take some getting-used-to period for some of the songs, but I will eventually end up liking 90% plus (at least) of the album.
I agree with neon_duke and others... yes, stealing music it's unethical. But I would be an hypocrite if I didn't say that it's unethical to ask $20 average (or thereabouts) for a CD and it's even more unethical to ask for that much if the CD will end up having 2 or 3 good songs on it (aka, the ones you hear on the radio) and nothing else.
Who is stealing from who here?
a) People that download music, and probably make a dent of a few thousand dollars on the musicians/producers 'deepdish' wallets
or
b) Musicians/producers that make millions of dollars out of one album by putting some effort on 3 out of the 20 songs that album contains?
I am not talking about groups that actually put some hard work (which for me, my opinion here, would be U2 and Pink Floyd and a few others that I personally like) of course.
And yes, if you don't like it, nobody is forcing you to buy it... But people will end up buying that album anyway, just because they like those 2 or 3 songs they hear on the radio and they will end up disappointed by the rest...
Just my 3 or 4 cent worth of opinion... nothing else - feel free to agree/disagree... it's just an opinion after all
EDIT:

Didn't realize this thread was almost 2 years old... lol!
The Wizard.