Originally posted by neon_duke
Why am I being called "ignorant"? I watched rap videos back when people knew who Snoop Dogg was, which means about 7 years ago. They were almost all the same: a fancy house, fancy cars,lots of jewelry, lots of dancing chicks with big hooters. Fast forward seven years: exactly the same thing, by whoever the rapper-du-jour is. The only difference is that now insetad of a '63 Impala convertible with hydraulics, gold-plated trim, and reverse-offset wire wheels, it's an Escalade XLT with 26" spinners. Seven years is a long damn time.
Actually, there's one other variant of the rap video: the stage-set one. Always shot from low-level cameras mounted on the floor in front of the artist, often with a wide-angle lens. Always with flash-fade view changes, where an image (usually of slow-mo dancing chicks) is flashed on the screen, then fades to black, to be replaced 2 seconds later by another image, which fades and flashes to something different. The background is glittery, usually silver, and looks like the interior of a disco on a space station. So, OK, that makes two ideas they've come up with in 10 years.
Live-performance videos are one thing: a band on stage is a band on stage. They may be lame, too, but there is a certain set layout and production design that is dictated by that type of video. If it's a band or a rap act onstage makes no difference; that's not what I'm arguing about.
There are hundreds and thousands of crappy pop music videos too. All European metal band videos look the same, no question. I'm not argunin that point either.
It also has nothing to do with the fact that I don't like most rap. In point of fact, I do like some (though I guess it's more hiphop than actual rap). I'm merely talking about the total sameness of the videos, and the image projected. And the hysterical insistence that each rap artist is an individual. It's just time for them to move on a little.