Why is Motorsport Largely Ignored by the Rest of the Sports World?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Robin
  • 67 comments
  • 25,852 views
I'll just quote this comment from a guy in YouTube. This is from a video when Mark Webber got food poisoning and decided to continue on with the race at Fuji.

If a footballer started being sick on the pitch, he would roll over and hold his knee lol

ashybline 1 month ago 54
 
I wouldn't say Motorsport is a proper sport...
You don't get any exercise by driving.Football is a sport and probably the best sport. :lol:

And yet, F1 drivers are probably the fittest sportsmen in the world...

Exercise =/= sport
Sport =/= exercise
 
Sure... Bullfighting is a great sport.

Its an awesome sport! IMO i think sports are generally something that takes massive amounts bravery. Like bullfighting and the 2 other sports mentioned.
 
Today my dad got the shell v-zine magazine that he gets every couple of months for being a member of this shell reward card scheme. They had a article about the CIK under 18 karting championships. The two things that they concentrated on in the article were "boasting" on how much some of the drivers paid (one spent 10,000 per event and did 27 events a year), and how competitive and like a mini f1 it was. Both of these things are very true for high level karting however when they also try and show karting as a first step in motorsport, and more easily accesable to the general public. This makes the wrong view of karting, and does give it once again that perception that motorsport is far from the average persons reach, which actually is reasonably cheap to get into if you do some reasearch.
 
The thing with golf though, is that you can still wander off to a local park and play some pitch and putt or even crazy golf for £5 or whatever.
Its only the proper clubs that are membership and even those have cheaper ones or less "elitist" ones.

Golf is nothing like motorsport - which is why it too is also more popular..its cheaper and more accessible.

Again, I don't think its anything to do with motorsport's image. Its to do with how inaccessible and expensive it is. People don't care about motorsport because they think its just rich people - its because they have never had a direct involvement and so find it harder to really relate to it. Its easier to relate to Golf because chances are most people have tried their hand at it at some point, even if its just crazy golf.

This is pretty much it. I wanted to get into motorsports as a kid (like we all do, but I was deadly serious :sly:), but motorsports just aren't as accessible as simply going to the shop, paying a fiver for a Basketball and shooting some hoops or whatever. Driving a car in Britain is expensive as it is. Racing them is just simply way too much money for an Average Joe family. There are the few exceptions that have worked their way up from the absolute bottom, yes, but they're exceptional cases.

When was the last time anyone called up their mates and asked them if they felt like a quick blast around Silverstone? :sly:
 
Sure... Bullfighting is a great sport.

If you squint hard, you might notice a tiny speck, disappearing into the distance. It was the point, and you missed it.
 
I think the main reason motorsport isn't popular is that it is difficult to get involved. If you look at the most popular sports in the world, nearly all of them are sports that the average child can play even just outside their house with some mates. Motorsport, just like sports like skiing or snowboarding, requires specific circumstances and unlike those two sports it requires a lot of money (or at least, a lot more money) to get involved.

So the majority of people very easily grow up never being involved in motorsport and so obviously have less of a personal interest than in say football, basketball, athletics or whatever.

This.

I never cared at all for ball sports, but I was still surrounded by it growing up. At school we had ball teams, and the players were my classmates. Other classmates were friends or relatives of players and attended the games to cheer on my classmates. If they weren't playing football or basketball, they were cheerleaders cheering at the games or part of the army of band members playing at the games or pep rallies. Classmates had our team's jackets and walls were adorned with posters supporting our team. It was everywhere and inescapable.

In contrast, I knew exactly zero people involved in motorsports. None of my classmates were racing cars, and none of them were related to anyone driving race cars that I knew of. Ball sports were all around me everywhere and motorsports were nowhere but on television. We all knew ball players, of one sport or another, but nobody knew race drivers.
 
Well, it's worse in the US. Not once have I heard something on the news related to Motorsports.

Everyone here is only interested in the NBA and NFL. If you even say you like Soccer at my school, you'll be branded as a gay European. They all think that Football is the hardest and most athletic sport, but they're really weak compared to Formula 1 drivers. The fact that these guys take G-Forces similar to a fighter jet for hours upon hours is truly amazing.

Then there's Rally Racing, which for someone's body to take that many bumps is a lot more severe then a whole game of tackles in football.

And Le Mans racers. Even though they don't keep driving for 24 hours straight, they still have to drive the same length as what, like three football games?
 
Down here in Australia all we get on our sports section is just AFL. That goes for about something like 8 minutes. Then they go over to some other sport such as rugby or golf. They then leave the motorsport to last; with roughly 30 seconds to show it. Also as I watch a lot of NASCAR and search forums I see lot's of people write stuff such as, “NASCAR fans are just a bunch of rednecks”. However the chances are they don't even watch it.

There are many fans who do watch the sport which certainly are not ‘red necks’. Like myself for instance. Maybe if some people did a bit of research they would find that F1 drivers and others alike are some of the best athletes in the world. Instead of assuming that in ALL motorsports someone suits in a car and drives around in circles. I find that really ignorant; especially when those don’t even bother to watch it.

Formula One driver does for example have to fully concentrate at all times. However in an AFL match they get a nice break every 20 minutes. I believe Formula One is one the most physically demanding sports in the world; if not the most physically demanding.

Every year, apart from 2009 and 2010; Mark Webber has been coming down to Tasmania to run a challenge. This involves running, bike riding and kayaking across the whole entire state of Tasmania. I regard Mark Webber as one of the fittest Australian sports people. I would put money on him out doing a football player in an endurance test. This goes for all other F1 drivers who are constantly training.

There is a hell of a lot more then sitting in a car and driving around. People who disagree need to pull their head out.
 
Last edited:
No. You can do it on your sofa in jeans and a t-shirt.

That's until someone invents gaming clothes....tubes running through your vest for optimal cooling and enhance your reflexes anyone? 👍
 
crispychicken49
Well, it's worse in the US. Not once have I heard something on the news related to Motorsports.

Everyone here is only interested in the NBA and NFL. If you even say you like Soccer at my school, you'll be branded as a gay European. They all think that Football is the hardest and most athletic sport, but they're really weak compared to Formula 1 drivers. The fact that these guys take G-Forces similar to a fighter jet for hours upon hours is truly amazing.

Then there's Rally Racing, which for someone's body to take that many bumps is a lot more severe then a whole game of tackles in football.

And Le Mans racers. Even though they don't keep driving for 24 hours straight, they still have to drive the same length as what, like three football games?

Woah now. I'm Canadian and while I like football, hockey is my game (of course) but much of my research and my job will revolve around all athletes. Before you go saying that racing is tougher than football do you have any idea what the average life span is of a pro football player? Less than 60 years now because of the abuse their bodies take. Racing is not tougher on the body although I do have great admiration for what they do.

Second of all I very much agree with the fact that it's not as popular because it's harder to get into. Kids want to be able to try what they watch on tv and with motorsports they more often than not can't. Look at soccer (football) and it's popularity. The most popular sport on the planet and all that it takes to play are some people, 1 ball and 4 "things" to use as posts.

Thirdly motosports are harder to present on tv. "Ball sports" can easily be shown with scheduled breaks for commercials, generally shorter programing time, and highlights are easier to show.
 
Last edited:
They all think that Football is the hardest and most athletic sport
They should try rugby union some time. It's always struck me as odd that a nation that prides itself on its virility feels the need to strap on forty pounds of body armour just to play a game of rugby.
 
I think you really have to have a different mindset to get interested in motorsports, both as a driver and as a spectator/fan. You need to have a bit of a technological interest, a desire for speed, and/or being impressed by spectacular ways to burn money.
There´s not much tech in soccer or golf (well, undeniably there is some tech in how to make balls, bats, clubs etc), but in any kind of motorsport technology is always driven as far as the rules allow, and in some sport the tech levels are just mindblowing. Usually all motorsports are about speed, allthough there are ofcourse exceptions. You can watch Sprintrunning or shorttrack swimming for humanpropelled speed, or cycling, but there you miss out on tech. And let´s face it, a pileup in NASCAR really is a spectacular way of blowing vast sums of money! I can´t say I get the same buzz over a player- transfer in soccer, allthough there are fantazillions involved.

On a personal level, it was technology that hooked me up. Firstly to F1. After a while though, you get to grips with the politics usually involved in racing, and you start looking for other motorsports, and today I usually only watch the GP of Monaco and just keep track of who becomes world champion. Nowadays, I keep a close watch on GT racing around the globe, and to some extent I follow the technological twists and turns i LMP1. Not so much the racing though. Somehow I find the tech more interesting.
 
Last edited:
They should try rugby union some time. It's always struck me as odd that a nation that prides itself on its virility feels the need to strap on forty pounds of body armour just to play a game of rugby.

American Football known for how dangerous a game it is. If they got rid of all that padding and the helmet, it probably wouldn't be any worse than Rugby.
 
They should try rugby union some time. It's always struck me as odd that a nation that prides itself on its virility feels the need to strap on forty pounds of body armour just to play a game of rugby.

They do. They don't seem to be very good, but they do play.
 
Motorsport is very different to other sports, in that if you buy a football for £5, you can play football until your hearts content. Then think about motorsport, the investment never ends. Just to take part at the most basic level for 30 minutes is around £30, and thats expensive compared to the HOURS of football you are used to from that £5 expenditure.

You then get to that the belief that it is more about the car you are driving than the car (can be true in places), that a driver has no physical demand, races go on for HOURS with no action, you just go around in circles, and add to that its KILLING THE PLANET WITH ITS TOXIC FUMES OF DEATH OMG! (The combination of every car driving the entire race distance for the entire calendar releases less Carbon Dioxide than 1 B777 flight from Heathrow to Singapore....).

My brothers love football but watch motorsports - but only for the crashes. In the same way I only watch Match of the Day for the goals scored.
 
As a lot of people here have said. Motorsport is harder to get into. There's a lot more money involved. But to be honest, I could be being ignorant (I'm not that into sport). But there seems that there is a little more variety in motorsport then say, soccer or tennis. If they class say touring cars and Formula 1 as one sport, because they're both motorsport. But then they would class say two similar sports as two different sports. They can't see the side from the other end. The reason it is ignored is probably because people seem so obsessed with the economy and would much rather complain about it.

Sports that aren't motorsports also are easier for the youngsters to get into. It's easy for a 7 year old to play rugby or Golf. But they can't just casually buy a Go Kart and race it.

Oh, and another point. Sports are always pushed onto children at schools. Gym, PE, all end up doing Sports. This helps them understand sport a lot more and they leave school and love that sport because they can play it.
 
Another thing that puts people off, is that the fatality rate is quite high compared to other sports.
 
Motorsports will likely always be a niche sport, and one very big reason is that it is a very complex and intricate form of sport. There's so many variables involved, which almost makes it very inaccessible for the casual observer to get into, especially because the average expectation of a motor race is a pass for the lead twice a lap - all race long, fourteen spectacular crashes, thirty-six beautiful and completely unique cars, at least one pit fire, and a brawl after the event is over. Instead, the average race isn't terribly thrilling to someone with no initial interest in automobiles, competition, strategy, and other obscure facets of the event/series.

There's a huge disconnect between the masses and what is perceived about the drivers; they're rich folks doing something that is generally not thought of as an athletic activity - driving a car - which is believed to be something "any" teenager can do once they get their license. Once I explained to someone that something like the Daytona 500 is an experience you can try for yourself: Go take a road trip within Florida in July, but you can't turn the air conditioning on. Put down all the windows, and suit yourself up in long underwear and your best three-piece suit and tie. No bathroom breaks, and you can't get out of the car. No radio, and you have to increase the volume of your engine about four-fold. Plus, we're taking away the power steering. And forty others are doing the same thing, and don't care if they bump you out of the way so they can also finish first.

The early days of racing were, in fact, only composed of royalty and well-heeled enthusiasts, because motor vehicles were scarce and expensive, and therefore only the wealthy could afford to compete...never mind they were basically fearless conquistadors using scarcely-tested machinery over roads that likely hadn't been proven for automotive use! The dangers of motorsports are apparent in other forms of sport, but nothing like the casualty levels in auto racing to this day, which sort of relegates it to a bit of a blood sport in the public's eye.

I think that's probably NASCAR made such a huge push to be that "5th sport", part of which was that the drivers used to be average folk with a smaller budget to get their way tot he top, and many still worked on their farms the Monday after the race, or went hunting, et cetera. Some of them really connected with their fanbase, but as the sport polished itself so much to the way to the top, the personalities dissolved into every other average athlete, more concerned about his sponsor appearances than relating to their fan base. And that's what I don't get; the superstar stick-and-ball athlete isn't any different than the superstar racing driver...why do the fans think there's so much difference between them?

The average person doesn't know too much about the way their own car works, and therefore, doesn't really care to know more about the technicalities of aerodynamics and heat dissipation. On the other hand, does the average football fan really care much about how the turf was grown? The exact type of wood in a baseball bat, and how to manufacture one to exacting standards? Sure, there's always a few fans who want to know everything, but most team sports are just as accessible to the public without knowing those things. Auto racing in its various forms demands a little bit more knowledge because the car plays a role that's just as important as the driver, which unfairly "reduces" his role in the public eye.

So there's just a couple of points. A lot of people just think it's plain boring, which explains away a lot of things.
 
Last edited:
Another thing that puts people off, is that the fatality rate is quite high compared to other sports.

Debatable. I think its higher profile and more dramatic than other sports at least when it happens. It would be interesting (though admittedly a little morbid) to read some stats with regards to that.
 
Another thing that puts people off, is that the fatality rate is quite high compared to other sports.

Actually it isn´t. Bicycle racing claim way more victims annually,and so does downhill skiing. Even cheerleading seems to be more fatal than motorsports... This is ofcourse due to the fact that these mentioned sports have way more participants than motorsports, but even if go by percentage, motorsports are very safe nowadays. That it should have a high fatality rate is a linger from the past, when just about any race - on two or four wheels - had a fatal accident. Today I would be surprised if the deathtoll even reached 100 people globally per year, counting all motorsports, even airracing and amateur rallying.
 
I think it is because it requires endurance, skill and Talent. What do you guy's think?
 
Having the word 'sport' in the name kind of answers that question...
 
"There are only three sports: bullfighting, motor racing, and mountaineering; all the rest are merely games."

Ernest Hemingway

:sly:
 
Another thing that puts people off, is that the fatality rate is quite high compared to other sports.

I would agree that this is partially correct. Whenever my girlfriend watches any motorsport with me, she gets a little nervous. When people are racing wheel to wheel, she starts to get scared. We went to the Indycar race in Toronto during the summer, and on the friday, we sat in one of the stands early. We saw the "ferrari challenge" and she told me how amazed she was at the speed.

After the Ferrari's, we went inside, looking to buy something to drink. I looked out the window, and saw an indycar flash by (I thought there was more time until they began) and told her. She looked out the window, waited a few seconds, then another car flashed past us.

She was terrified. Some people may feel the same way, even when watching it on TV. I noticed some people saying they are now too scared to watch Motogp after witnessing Simoncelli's accident, for fear of seeing something similar happen.
 
To make motorsport more popular, introduce it in schools? Hmm... High School karting teams? Oh my god that would be awesome!!!! :drool:
 
Like P.E., the practical side is Karting, and the Theory would include the rules and regulations of each formula, studying the history of motorsport, and a project could include making your own formula, or designing circuits and cars!

I've had it all planned in my head for many years! :D
 
I absolutely hate normal sports, so motorsports is what I'm in to 👍
 
Back