I just bought the Chiron (for the ticket) and drove it stock and with upgrades to compare. With upgrades, the car is impossible to drive in the turns because it doesn't stay straight like the stock suspension.
I don't take it as criticism, sorry it sounds like that.
Just tried it, no difference. The car only becomes unstable when doing sudden turns left or right if you slalom to overtake cars, but that's normal in road cars at very high speed... But if you drive in straightline? No problem at all
Issue with controller + stock suspesion combo then
Or not an issue with controllers at all, it's clearly an issue with the physics when using the stock suspension.
Car is undrivable with stock suspension or with upgrade suspension. I have a C7 Corvette ZR1 with 1000+ hp and I do slalom to overtake cars without any problem. This car is not stable at high speed in a straight line. It becomes a problem when every person commenting says there is and you're alone defending the opposite.
There you go everyone, he said so. Threads closed.
Which isn't correct behaviour. The car shouldn't spin out like that on the SSRX banking. It went full speed around the banking at Nardo in real life without a hint of drama (beyond the speed). The tyres aren't the problem, it's something to do with the physics of the stock suspension.
The Veyron apparently did not go full speed around Nardo. Or at least, it didn't record its top speed at Nardo. The Koenigsegg CCR holds the record at Nardo at 388km/h (241mph).
Your wheel must have some setting wrong then, or something strange. Me and several other friends that have a wheel, confirmed what I said. Done using a thrustmaster T150, T300 and TGT.
The problem is a specific mission, hence not being able to change the car.
I don't think I can do this with any car without the wheel undulating back and forth. Like speed wobbles on a skateboard. I know trying to put any steering direction into a car at 400kmh is going to be twitchy at best but for me this specific mission seems like a bit much. This was with aids off. It feels like it randomly wants to pull to one side or the other and if you don't hold the wheel perfectly still any input/correction is immediately amplified and the car goes into a death wobble. Weather this is realistic or not, I have no idea. But if intended, it it defiantly not errrrrr "end user friendly" for lack of a better term.
Well me and several of my friends, that are here posting I might add, confirmed what I said. So let's maybe try and help each other instead of being dismissive?
I knew GT7 felt kind of uninspired to me but I hope your wrong. That just seems like a crappy thing to do on PD's part imo. Come to think of it I guess rabbit races are in the same vein. It's a shame. I really loved GT7 at first, but now I'm just left with feelings of meh.
Why is it a crappy thing to do? The S-10 license is driving a 50 year old race car on a wet track with slick tires on it. That's the challenge portion of it. If it were easy anyone could do it. Slipstreaming past everyone in a car that is super stable and has no difficulty completing the task wouldn't be a challenge at all. So they set the car up to be intentionally twitchy to make the challenge harder. It's still a feasible challenge and if I recall not one that took many tries to beat.
It looks to be counter-steer assistance. It's set to weak. I have no clue what it does or why it's on. Maybe it got turned on when I did the S-10 race and I forgot to turn it off. I don't think it aids in any straight line driving though.
Only the video doesn't answer the questions being asked, it demonstrates how to gold that mission well, but with regards to what is being discussed here there's a lot of "I don't know" in there. How to gold that mission isn't what's up for debate. The video doesn't explain why the Veyron becomes unstable on SSRX or other circuits where it can reach high speeds nor does it come remotely close to negating that there's an issue with the stock suspension physics underpinning the problem.
No, it demonstrates that with the right delicacy you can complete that event while keeping the car under control, that's not a demonstration that the car is ultimatley a stable car, that's a demonstration of delicate control. Now you can try to argue that demonstrating one proves the other, but that is most certainly not the case as whilst lacking the requisite levels of control can make an even stable car feel unstable, being deft enough to control an unstable car in a given situation does not suddenly make that car stable.
