Will there be a new 3000GT (GTO)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter skylinevspec2
  • 56 comments
  • 3,094 views
Messages
37
I wonder if Mitsubishi will ever bring back the 3000GT (GTO). I know it wasn't as fast as the other Japanese cars, but I'm sure if they make a new one, it would be better. The Lancer Evolution is a great car but it's a four door. Probably around 2005, if Mazda creates a new RX8, Nissan introduces a new Skyline, Acura creates the new NSX, and Toyota brings back the Supra. Maybe Mitsubishi will compete with the 3000GT (GTO) also.
 
The word is "Japanese"...not what you said.:banghead: That is considered a derogatory word here at this forum. Consult the AUP and have a nice day:)
 
Originally posted by VG30DETT
What's wrong with a four door?!

I just think manufacturer's high performance vehicles should only be two doors just like the NSX, Skyline, and RX7. Lancer Evolution is Mitsubishi's fastest car, and it's better if it was a two door because two doors are more sportier looking. Some people see the Lancer as a sport family car.
 
Originally posted by skylinevspec2
I just think manufacturer's high performance vehicles should only be two doors just like the NSX, Skyline, and RX7. Lancer Evolution is Mitsubishi's fastest car, and it's better if it was a two door because two doors are more sportier looking. Some people see the Lancer as a sport family car.

I don't know. If I see an STi or Evolution, I think sporty. With the STi pulling a 13.2 second quarter mile isn't exactly a family sedan. The STi is just a tad off par with the others as far as quarter mile times from the factory.

My dad has also talked about how four doors have a more ridgid chassis, and I can see that. One example I can think of is the GC8 2.5RS Sedan vs. Coupe. The Coupe has two huge doors, while mine has two smaller doors, with a support beam in the middle.

Plus the weight isn't that much more. I believe mine is only 45lbs heavier.

I don't really mind four doors. I always liked coupes until I had the Subaru. Four doors is very nice to have when shipping more than just yourself, or you and one other passenger.

I don't mean to sound particular to four doors. I still like coupes as well. But I really don't see any big weighing pros and cons that would make me go one way or the other.
 
Originally posted by skylinevspec2
I just think manufacturer's high performance vehicles should only be two doors just like the NSX, Skyline, and RX7. Lancer Evolution is Mitsubishi's fastest car, and it's better if it was a two door because two doors are more sportier looking. Some people see the Lancer as a sport family car.

there is a 4 door skyline GTR too. it was undefeated for 3 straight years in group N (sedan) racing.
 
most likely..there will NOT be another generation of the GTO..mostly because of the price tag..it was too expensive, and people didn't want to buy it..so they discontinued it..also, it's a boat anchor..weighin in at almost 4000 pounds..it's just like the supra..sure it was a fast car with a lot of style..but it was too damn expensive and people didn't want to spend 50k+ for a sports car..
 
Originally posted by skylineGTR_guy
there is a 4 door skyline GTR too. it was undefeated for 3 straight years in group N (sedan) racing.

Yeah. When I first saw the GTR, I only thought they came in coupes. Then after poping in the GT2 disc and seeing the sedan one, it just flipped my lid.

Muhahaha, twin turbo and room for five! BUAHAHAHAH!
 
Originally posted by VG30DETT
Yeah. When I first saw the GTR, I only thought they came in coupes. Then after poping in the GT2 disc and seeing the sedan one, it just flipped my lid.

Muhahaha, twin turbo and room for five! BUAHAHAHAH!

the coupe can hold 4 comfortably. 5 is a squeeze.
 
I really do hope that Mitsubishi brings back the 3000GT, it is a very beautiful, yet powerful car. Mitsubishi and Toyota are currently the only Japanese manufacturers who do not have a high performance sports car. So, if they want to compete with the rest, they will have to bring back their obvious choices: the 3000GT and Supra.

If Mitsubishi does bring back the 3000GT, I hope the current Mitsubishi designers stay far, very far away from it...
 
Originally posted by Viper Zero
I really do hope that Mitsubishi brings back the 3000GT, it is a very beautiful, yet powerful car. Mitsubishi and Toyota are currently the only Japanese manufacturers who do not have a high performance sports car. So, if they want to compete with the rest, they will have to bring back their obvious choices: the 3000GT and Supra.

If Mitsubishi does bring back the 3000GT, I hope the current Mitsubishi designers stay far, very far away from it...


what?!? what about the Lancer Evolution is it not high performance enough for ya :D
 
well i think the evo and wrx are four door because of rally requirements or something. 3000gt probably will not be brought back because japanese car manufacturers are designing enviromentally freindly cars to meet new emission standards, so no more turbos.
 
Originally posted by slvr2000fdvspec
most likely..there will NOT be another generation of the GTO..mostly because of the price tag..it was too expensive, and people didn't want to buy it..so they discontinued it..also, it's a boat anchor..weighin in at almost 4000 pounds..it's just like the supra..sure it was a fast car with a lot of style..but it was too damn expensive and people didn't want to spend 50k+ for a sports car..

Another somewhat mis-informed person..

The 3k VR-4 along with the FD RX7, MK4 Supra and Z32 300zx, were absolute bargains for the price. There are numerous reasons why Japan's super cars had low sales figures. (NSX included)

For starters, in the early-mid 90's, the people that could afford these cars were not interested in "Japanese crap" and would overlook them. Most of the people who wanted the cars, could not afford them. Alot of people said they weren't worth the money, even though in magazine comparisons they usualy dominated/equaled cars whose price tag was double.

Speaking of prices; the reason the price was considered "high" was due in part to the steadily increasing value of the Japanese Yen. The Japanese' infamous use of new/expensive technology also played a huge factor. This led to what was dubbed the "Japanese super-car war of the 90's." Japan's race to build the ultimate super-car.

All of that is in the past. An increasing number of people are recognizing that you don't need a V8 to have a fast/competitive/enjoyable car. It's about time.

On topic, no, I do not think there will be a new 3000GT. I do think a new 2-door sports car is in the works though.. :)
 
Answering the question, I second what most people have said: there will likely never be another 3000GT, and certainly not within the next five years. Mitsubishi's having enough trouble as it is, there would be no point from an economic view to bring back a car which has only a chance for very little profit.
 
Aslong as the Vr4 Line continues, even with the Current Galant, i'm happy.....
280HP out of a Family car with AWD, AYC, and AWS, not to mention the TT v6.....Sounds similar to some other popular Japanese supercars out there.
 
Originally posted by Monster7
Another somewhat mis-informed person..

The 3k VR-4 along with the FD RX7, MK4 Supra and Z32 300zx, were absolute bargains for the price. There are numerous reasons why Japan's super cars had low sales figures. (NSX included)

For starters, in the early-mid 90's, the people that could afford these cars were not interested in "Japanese crap" and would overlook them. Most of the people who wanted the cars, could not afford them. Alot of people said they weren't worth the money, even though in magazine comparisons they usualy dominated/equaled cars whose price tag was double.

uh..you said supra has a bargain price tag? would you pay close to $60,000 for a 3600 pound car that makes 280 horsepower? i dont think so..i'd rather get a wrx or mr2 for about $15,000 at max, and use the rest of the money to dump into engine mods, with $45,000, you can get twice as much power as a stock supra, half the weight of a stock supra, and i'm sure you would still have money left for the body..60g's for a sports car is not worth it at all..and NOT a bargain price tag..
 
Originally posted by slvr2000fdvspec
uh..you said supra has a bargain price tag? would you pay close to $60,000 for a 3600 pound car that makes 280 horsepower? i dont think so..i'd rather get a wrx or mr2 for about $15,000 at max, and use the rest of the money to dump into engine mods, with $45,000, you can get twice as much power as a stock supra, half the weight of a stock supra, and i'm sure you would still have money left for the body..60g's for a sports car is not worth it at all..and NOT a bargain price tag..

About a year ago I was looking at used Supra prices, they were about 20k. I also was looking at used WRXs recenlty, $20k. :odd:
 
Originally posted by VG30DETT
About a year ago I was looking at used Supra prices, they were about 20k. I also was looking at used WRXs recenlty, $20k. :odd:

i just got the newspaper with me right now, and in one of my super street magazines from 2003..a used decent condition 1998 supra can still sell for 30,000+..and i'm talkin bout the 2.5rs wrx's..not the new ones, those you can get for about 15,000 in a good condition..
 
I think you can get a MKIV Supra cheaper than $30k. Earlier ones much cheaper. There was a MKIII (I believe) still in good condition, automatic, for 3k.

Also a 2.5RS and a WRX are two very different trim lines, and very different prices.

Edit: Search for a Toyota Supra on www.cars.com. There are many that are well over the $20k range. But just to show that there are some for $20k. The highest one is $50k, still well short of the $60k you posted.
 
Originally posted by slvr2000fdvspec
i just got the newspaper with me right now, and in one of my super street magazines from 2003..a used decent condition 1998 supra can still sell for 30,000+..and i'm talkin bout the 2.5rs wrx's..not the new ones, those you can get for about 15,000 in a good condition..

The Supra was NEVER 60k. Even when the cars were new and the dealers price gouged people, they didn't come close to that price. And hating on a car because it has a fantastic resale value, is like having a Bart Simpson avatar.
It makes no sense.​

MK4 Supra's go for around 17-40k depending on what state their located in, and the year/mileage.

As for you buying an MR2 or 2.5RS over a Supra, I suggest you do that. I wouldn't want it any other way.
 
With 45 thousand you can make a geo metro outrun a supra... Either way most people would choose the supra over the other cars, supras can handle more power and put it to the ground, with the WRX and other cars you would need a new block and pretty much have to replace every single stock part to put out what a supra or skyline can. One of tha major reasons for the high prices on supras is due to F&F becasue everyone thinks theyre so cool now...nobody really goes out and says hey I'll buy a car and dump 45K into it to make it fast, they just buy the more expensive car.
 
And hating on a car because it has a fantastic resale value, is like having a Bart Simpson avatar.

It makes no sense.

lol

oh yeah someone gave the wrong numbers for the supra. US spec Supra was rated 320 hp and 315 ft-lbs torque. stock supras on a dyno make as much as 270-290 hp to the rear wheels i know because i troll on supraforums :lol:
 
What if you dont want a viper? While I dont want either, I would much rather have a viper over a 3000gt. More room to mod, more cylinders to fill with nitrous.
 
Back