- 4,396
Couldn't find a thread so I thought I should run this here:
A game this late on last gen, you'd expect it to be a bit of a looker. But no.. I am not at all impressed with BF4's visuals; the textures look blurry and boring up close.
And God... the banding! Why is the banding so bad, particularly in the sky? What were they thinking?!! Visual tearing is practically all over the place. MOH WF was a much better looking Dice shooter on the X360. Heck, most of the COD has better offerings have far better visuals, with better AA, and locked in at 60 fps, no tearing.
Why EA? I hear it looks brilliant on the PC, but are consoles really that inferior, or did EA just half ass it and give the console versions a rush job? Wonder how it runs on the PS3.
Sound design and "gun play", good fun as always.
A game this late on last gen, you'd expect it to be a bit of a looker. But no.. I am not at all impressed with BF4's visuals; the textures look blurry and boring up close.
And God... the banding! Why is the banding so bad, particularly in the sky? What were they thinking?!! Visual tearing is practically all over the place. MOH WF was a much better looking Dice shooter on the X360. Heck, most of the COD has better offerings have far better visuals, with better AA, and locked in at 60 fps, no tearing.
Why EA? I hear it looks brilliant on the PC, but are consoles really that inferior, or did EA just half ass it and give the console versions a rush job? Wonder how it runs on the PS3.
Sound design and "gun play", good fun as always.
Last edited: