He's not very tall. But he's big. I'd be curious to see him or someone like him inside a GT. I'm not dumb. I know how contracts usually work. Is it that hard to understand I'm questioning that specific clause and its legitimacy? I didn't sign anything so I can question it as much as I want. It doesn't seem right to me that someone who bought a product full price (it's not "essentially a leased vehicle" as you claim) has to be hostage of a contract with a clause like that for 2 years (or 10 or 20 or 50?). I'm still wondering if you'd have the same opinion if instead of 2 years we were talking about 20 or 50. Apparently it would be legal as well. Any source? I did a quick search and only find links to customers who sued Ferrari. Didn't find a case where Ferrari sued a customer for selling a car.