- 357
i hate you for being so good.
Perfect Balance's Gallery | Lancer Evo GT-A
- Thread starter Perfect Balance
- 944 comments
- 40,676 views
- 8,480
- P_Balance
Thanks everyone!
@TVR......: What would be the "next level?"
@TVR......: What would be the "next level?"
- 862
Damn that GT is nice! Awesome pics mate! The first one is great! I like 'em a lot!
And thanks for visiting my gallery too!
And thanks for visiting my gallery too!
- 2,837
- GTP_Div
You have improved a lot...I even see some of my style in your pics.
PERFECT BALANCE
Yeah you better! don´t you dare to chare sucha crap with us one more time!! OK,the Internet is big, but to waste it´s space with this is close to criminal.
Man!! How can you not be happy with a great work like this? The speed pics makes my monitor wanna fly over to my neighbour, I have to strap it down to the table to make it stand still
.Great work PB, they are all my favs
- 8,480
- P_Balance
Wow, thanks guys.
@Div: Most of my inspiration came from you, thats why it has some of your style mixed in there.
@M3_CSLl: I don't know why I don't like it, It's not what I'm trying to achieve. I'm not exactly sure what I'm trying to achieve either, but these shots arn't it.
@Div: Most of my inspiration came from you, thats why it has some of your style mixed in there.
@M3_CSLl: I don't know why I don't like it, It's not what I'm trying to achieve. I'm not exactly sure what I'm trying to achieve either, but these shots arn't it.
- 8,480
- P_Balance
Heres the next one, you guys might not think this update is better than the ford gt one, but i do. So when i said, I'll do better next time, this quialifies for me.
Leave a comment!
Now, this last one, I was going to blur the backround more, but ekmatt said "Don't do it, trust me." So I didn't do it, if you think it would look better blurred, go smack him in the forehead for telling me not to.
T-T-T-That's all folks!
Leave a comment!
Now, this last one, I was going to blur the backround more, but ekmatt said "Don't do it, trust me." So I didn't do it, if you think it would look better blurred, go smack him in the forehead for telling me not to.
T-T-T-That's all folks!
- 2,837
- GTP_Div
2nd and 5th, I don't usually comment a lot but woah! Those 2 pics are clean!
- 8,480
- P_Balance
Wow, thanks Div. Having you comment on my updates really makes me feel like I did a good job.Div is back
- 8,480
- P_Balance
Hey! Cool!
Thanks.
Thanks.
- 862
AWESOME!!! That's like the best M5-update that I have ever seen! And matt was right, the background looks stunning the way it is now.
What I really love is the 5th pic! It b-e-a-utiful!
Great job mate!
What I really love is the 5th pic! It b-e-a-utiful!
Great job mate!
- 3,935
- Netherlands
Wow, really nice pics of the white M5 man, I love them and there so clean and I like this car very much. Brave choice that you chose trial mountain. 👍 I guess you're more experimenting with the tracks you choose for the cars now, because you also had tokyo, with the grayish colors.
BTW I'm planning to switch to adobe too, maybe if you have some tips...
Oh and you shouldve blurred the background of the last pic...
BTW I'm planning to switch to adobe too, maybe if you have some tips...
Oh and you shouldve blurred the background of the last pic...
- 1,671
I told you PB 
!!! Some one did like it hehe. Very sweet / clean / motion defying update You're doing too many pictures with the blurring and motion blur a lot lately . So when I see your updates now, it's just similar but with a different car / track. Your best update by far in my opinon 👍 Keep it up.
!!! Some one did like it hehe. Very sweet / clean / motion defying update You're doing too many pictures with the blurring and motion blur a lot lately . So when I see your updates now, it's just similar but with a different car / track. Your best update by far in my opinon 👍 Keep it up.
- 8,480
- P_Balance
Thanks for the comments everyone.
M3_CSL: I understood your comment, i was just stating my reason for not liking the GT update.
M3_CSL: I understood your comment, i was just stating my reason for not liking the GT update.
- 8,480
- P_Balance
Thanks Vonie!
- 30
have these been edited or taken staight from the PS?
They look absolutely amazing!
They look absolutely amazing!
- 8,480
- P_Balance
Um...yea, these were edited a LOT. Thanks
- 8,480
- P_Balance
Thanks jmx.
Keef
Premium
- 24,551
- Dayton, OH
- GTP_KeefRacer
- GTP Keef
I'm multitasking right now. I'm eating some Cap'n Crunch, checking out your M5 pics, writing abut them, reading about the Netherlands in the ol' Encyclopedia because Sej's new Location thing got me curious, and trying to keep the cereal from getting soggy amidst all the confusion. I calls 'em like I sees 'em, and this is a good update, very different from your others lately.
It's called Netherlands, not Holland. Holland is the name of a couple provinces within the country, North Holland and South Holland. They speak Dutch, they are Dutch, and a Polder is a low lying area around and inside the Ijsselmeer, which is a lake, that were created by pumping water out of the lake. And believe it or not, but those Dutchies are more crazy about cheese than all those Packers up in Wisconsin.
But that's neither here nor there. So, back on topic, I like the brownish palette you have created for all these pics. It goes well with the creamy white of the M5.
Number 1 is a good pic, though not much is going on. Great editing, it's really smooth and screw-up free. And it has your old sig font, whereas the others have your new font. Much better than the old. What's with the dotties all over the edges of background objects?
The 2nd pic is one of the best in this update. It has all the action I love, a nice drift, plenty of smoke, and I dig the lines created by the fence and the road.
A lot like #1, #3 is pretty laid back. I like the yellow lights of the tunnel though; they give the pic a lot more color. That, in turn, makes the pic more intersting than #1.
And then there's #4. It's, well, purple. What else can I say. It's very different from any of the others. All I can see is the car, and I'm guessing that was your intention. There are a couple very faint highlights that look like lines or something, I can't really tell.
Nice flames you got there in #5. It's been a while since I've seen a backfire picture. When I first saw it I thought it was a banner pic, then I realized that you haven't made any banners for your new-and-improved gallery. Why not?
I like the red, black, and white scheme of the 6th pic. I guess you took this picture with a really high shutter speed because I can still see the spokes of the rims. Did it look bad with motion blur ofr something? I think it'd be better with a lower shutter speed.
Number 7, I thik, is the best photo here. It's exciting with the blur. It would look even better with a little more blur, like the car is just screaming through the tunnel with all it's 500hp fury. Those dotties are back again, around the tunnel lights. How do you do that?! They were in the GT update, too, and they look sweet.
Face it, you're never going to know if #8 looks better with or wothout blur unless you try it with the background blur. So make another one with the blur, post it, and decide. That's the only way to settle the debate.
I think it would be better with the blur, by the way.
It's called Netherlands, not Holland. Holland is the name of a couple provinces within the country, North Holland and South Holland. They speak Dutch, they are Dutch, and a Polder is a low lying area around and inside the Ijsselmeer, which is a lake, that were created by pumping water out of the lake. And believe it or not, but those Dutchies are more crazy about cheese than all those Packers up in Wisconsin.
But that's neither here nor there. So, back on topic, I like the brownish palette you have created for all these pics. It goes well with the creamy white of the M5.
Number 1 is a good pic, though not much is going on. Great editing, it's really smooth and screw-up free. And it has your old sig font, whereas the others have your new font. Much better than the old. What's with the dotties all over the edges of background objects?
The 2nd pic is one of the best in this update. It has all the action I love, a nice drift, plenty of smoke, and I dig the lines created by the fence and the road.
A lot like #1, #3 is pretty laid back. I like the yellow lights of the tunnel though; they give the pic a lot more color. That, in turn, makes the pic more intersting than #1.
And then there's #4. It's, well, purple. What else can I say. It's very different from any of the others. All I can see is the car, and I'm guessing that was your intention. There are a couple very faint highlights that look like lines or something, I can't really tell.
Nice flames you got there in #5. It's been a while since I've seen a backfire picture. When I first saw it I thought it was a banner pic, then I realized that you haven't made any banners for your new-and-improved gallery. Why not?
I like the red, black, and white scheme of the 6th pic. I guess you took this picture with a really high shutter speed because I can still see the spokes of the rims. Did it look bad with motion blur ofr something? I think it'd be better with a lower shutter speed.
Number 7, I thik, is the best photo here. It's exciting with the blur. It would look even better with a little more blur, like the car is just screaming through the tunnel with all it's 500hp fury. Those dotties are back again, around the tunnel lights. How do you do that?! They were in the GT update, too, and they look sweet.
Face it, you're never going to know if #8 looks better with or wothout blur unless you try it with the background blur. So make another one with the blur, post it, and decide. That's the only way to settle the debate.
I think it would be better with the blur, by the way.
