BMW to unleash 350bhp "M1"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Leonidae@MFT
  • 128 comments
  • 11,521 views

Leonidae@MFT

MFT Crash Test Dummie
Premium
Messages
5,302
Finland
Riverside, Ca
Messages
GTP_Leonidae_MFT
By Autocar

BMW’s M division has started development of an M version of the 1-series coupé, set to be equipped with a twin-turbocharged six-cylinder engine producing 350bhp.

The new two-door, details of which were first uncovered by Autocar back in November, has now been added to BMW’s stable of future production models, with right-hand-drive UK sales set to begin in mid-2011.

The decision to put the car into production has been attributed to an “overwhelmingly positive reaction” to recent customer clinics, according to at least one high-ranking BMW official. Aimed at attracting younger customers to BMW’s performance cars, the new coupé is set to become the M division’s most affordable model.

It will slot into the range beneath the M3 coupé, and should cost around £38,000, £8000 more than the 135i Coupé M Sport. That means it will compete directly with Audi’s forthcoming RS3.

Revealing the plans for the new 1-series-based model, M division boss Kay Segler said, “I want to set a clear signal that our products are financially accessible.

“With the modular production processes in place at BMW, it is possible to create performance cars that customers can not only dream about owning but also realistically afford.”

BMW is still deciding whether or not to call the car M1, a name originally used on the firm’s legendary road racer supercar in 1978. Inspiration for the new car comes from BMW’s tii concept, a sporting version of the 1-series coupé that was revealed at the 2007 Tokyo motor show.

While the powerplant in that car was never revealed, the new M car will use a revised version of BMW’s latest turbocharged straight six. In standard guise the 3.0-litre unit, recently unveiled in the 535i GT, uses a twin-scroll turbo aimed at providing a more linear delivery of power and better fuel economy than the earlier twin-turbocharged unit used in the 135i.

For the new M car the engine will re-adopt a twin-turbocharged layout, although the new system is said to differ quite dramatically from that used on the older engine; it’s likely to get a new turbo and a more efficient intercooler arrangement.

The modifications are said to be on a similar level to those seen in the recently introduced X5 M and X6 M, whose 547bhp twin-turbo 4.4-litre V8 has big changes compared with the standard V8 versions used in the X5 and X6.

The output of the new M six-pot is expected to climb to around 350bhp, some 48bhp more than the existing 135i M Sport but 70bhp less than the M3’s naturally aspirated 4.0-litre V8. More than outright power, though, it is torque that is likely to play a more significant role in defining the new car’s character.

No figures have been released, but with BMW’s standard turbocharged 3.0-litre six already producing an M3-equalling 295lb ft, the newly developed M version of this engine should be good for at least 310lb ft.

The basis for the new M-car is today’s 1-series coupé. Its driveline is likely to feature a standard six-speed dual-clutch gearbox and an electronically controlled M differential.

With a kerb weight of not much more than 1500kg, its straight-line performance should be close to that of the 1580kg M3. A relatively short 3.15:1 final drive promises a 0-60mph time of around 5.5sec.

Fuel-saving measures such as brake energy regeneration and possibly a stop-start system should also ensure the new M1 is no thirstier than the 135i, which is rated at 30.7mpg in six-speed manual guise.

Underneath, the layout of the 1-series coupé’s MacPherson strut (front) and multi-link (rear) suspension will remain the same. However, BMW’s M division engineers have set about altering the suspension properties, with firmer spring and dampers and a new set of bushes, along with lightweight 18-inch alloy wheels. “We’re aiming to make it a lot more dynamic than the standard 135i,” said Segler.

Setting the M1 apart from the standard 1-series coupé will be a typically subtle M division body kit, including a deeper front spoiler, flared front wheel arches, chunkier sills, a rear deck spoiler and a deeper rear valance with four chromed exhaust pipes.

Assembly of the newest M-car is likely to take place at BMW’s Leipzig factory in Germany. alongside standard versions of the 1-series coupé.

But with 18 months to go until it goes on sale in the UK, Segler is remaining coy about projected volumes. “We’re confident it will draw new customers to the M line-up, but in these difficult economic times it’s impossible to say how it will fare,” he said. “It does, however, reveal where the brand is heading.”

Source

BMW-51101041355251600x1060.jpg
 
Last edited:
Wasn't the "M" version of the 1-Series called "Tii" in order not to be confused with the true, M1?

Anyway, Interesting. The description of the car brings a pleasant image to the mind and the description of the power goodies, a smile.

EDIT: Nevermind the first paragraph, it was in the reading :dunce:.
 
The name still hasn't been decided... I advise a change to the thread title.

Glad they are doing this, but they need to make sure they put a real LSD in there and not some E-Diff nonsense.
 
Looks like it'll be an awesome car, but it disappoints me in a couple of areas. One is that I'd hoped they'd improve the performance through reducing weight rather than chucking more power at it, and the second is that I wish they'd given it a high-revving four-cylinder to make it a true successor to the E30 M3.

Also, I don't see the fuss about using the M1 nameplate (if they do go down that route) given that on outright performance there's actually little to separate the 1-Series from the 70s "supercar". At the end of the day it's just a name. Whether it'll be any good is much more important.
 
Looks like it'll be an awesome car, but it disappoints me in a couple of areas. One is that I'd hoped they'd improve the performance through reducing weight rather than chucking more power at it, and the second is that I wish they'd given it a high-revving four-cylinder to make it a true successor to the E30 M3.

Also, I don't see the fuss about using the M1 nameplate (if they do go down that route) given that on outright performance there's actually little to separate the 1-Series from the 70s "supercar". At the end of the day it's just a name. Whether it'll be any good is much more important.

Yeah... aside from the engine being in the wrong place and so on. It would be like if Mazda made some quick, light FWD roadster and called it the Miata. It just doesn't work.
 
The name still hasn't been decided... I advise a change to the thread title.

This.

Glad they are doing this, but they need to make sure they put a real LSD in there and not some E-Diff nonsense.

Sounds like the torque vectoring "Dynamic Performance Control" slippy diff from the X5M and X6M. Better than a purely mechanical LSD because its proactive rather than reactive.

I've been trying to figure out if this is the same GKN Driveline (or very similar) diff Audi uses on the new S4 --it too is advertised with an optional torque vectoring rear diff.


M
 
Title changed due the outraged screams from M-power supporters. :p IMHO, I would also want to see high revving NA 4-cylinder engine instead of heavy turbocharged 6-cylinder. And while they're at it, make an M-sport Diesel out of the 123d..
 
Is it weird that, for me, 'M1' doesn't conjure up images of this:

bmw-m1-26-3-08.jpg


but instead this:

mbiwew.jpg


?

Perhaps there's something wrong with me... Also I love how they've said it's 'aimed at attracting younger customers to the M range'. How young, exactly? It's £38,000 - anyone who could buy and insure this isn't going to be any younger than the average M3 buyer; he's just going to make less.
 
*Tounge firmly planted in cheek*

I thought Garand made the original M1?!?!
 
Yeah... aside from the engine being in the wrong place and so on. It would be like if Mazda made some quick, light FWD roadster and called it the Miata. It just doesn't work.

Wouldn't bother me. I own the best of the breed and they can do what they like from now on (also worth remembering that the majority of the MX prototypes were FWD, but I digress).

It's still an M-car, it'll still be crazy fast, and it'll still handle brilliantly just like any other non-SUV M-car. "M1" is just a name, and one that people get far too hung up on.
 
Unfortunately... they could've handled better if they were lighter. While the X6M is faster than the top Cayenne, some people have expressed disappointment at how heavy and cumbersome it feels compared to the regular X6.

Wouldn't bother me. I own the best of the breed and they can do what they like from now on (also worth remembering that the majority of the MX prototypes were FWD, but I digress).

MX3, MX5, MX6... (drools in anticipation of upcoming MX3 based on Kabura... then remembers the Mazda isn't going to build it, anyway...) :(

It's still an M-car, it'll still be crazy fast, and it'll still handle brilliantly just like any other non-SUV M-car. "M1" is just a name, and one that people get far too hung up on.

It's not even a name. It's an alphanumeric designation.

It's like saying that Ferrari has no right to use the numbers 456 for future cars because they used it already. Of course, Ferrari subscribes to this, so their new car is a 458... hate to see what happens when their base model gets close to 6 liters... or when they start building downsized models with smaller engines (can't use 250, 308 and 355!) :lol: .

-

Kind of ironic having a 1-series M car with over 1500 kgs. I'd rather have a 120 tiit with a 300 horse 2 liter motor and a lighter body (say, 1350... hopefully less).
 
Sorry but from what I've read so far the X5M and X6M handle excellentley.... for their class.

I think I phrased that badly. I'm aware that the X5M and X6M are probably the best handling SUVs money can buy, but I'd suspect they're a long way off the M3/M5/M6 and certainly a bit wide of the mark as far as the M ethos goes.

@ Niky - not only the MX-3 and MX-6, but as far as I know the MX-5 that made it to production was the only non-FWD prototype submitted for consideration. All the rest were essentially based on a shortened 323 chassis.
 
Of course, Ferrari subscribes to this, so their new car is a 458... hate to see what happens when their base model gets close to 6 liters... or when they start building downsized models with smaller engines (can't use 250, 308 and 355!)
That's no problem. Ferrari has like 3 completely different naming schemes!
 
Do they? Always thought it was two.... F40, F50, F60 for the supercars (but then they made the FXX... so now they're out of numbers!) and then 308, 348, 355, 360, 430, etcetera for the lower-rung "sportscars" (never mind that the Scuderia versions have supercar pace...)... well two conventions for their modern line-up... don't know how they did the historical ones...

(Would still love to see a 2.0 or 2.5 liter V8 or even... gasp... a V12... bring Ferarri back to its roots with a small front-engined roadster powered by such... price it at over $100,000 and it'd still sell.)

I think I phrased that badly. I'm aware that the X5M and X6M are probably the best handling SUVs money can buy, but I'd suspect they're a long way off the M3/M5/M6 and certainly a bit wide of the mark as far as the M ethos goes.

Yup. No lightening. Tons of dynamic aids. That's why they called them the X6M and X5M instead of the MX5 and MX6... whoops. :lol:

@ Niky - not only the MX-3 and MX-6, but as far as I know the MX-5 that made it to production was the only non-FWD prototype submitted for consideration. All the rest were essentially based on a shortened 323 chassis.

The MX6, mind, was a 626. Too bad they never made an MX9. :lol:

Ah... the MX6... would've been the new Mustang if people didn't complain about how sacrilegious it would be to have a Mazda with a live axle in front! :lol:
 
Yup. No lightening. Tons of dynamic aids. That's why they called them the X6M and X5M instead of the MX5 and MX6... whoops. :lol:

Which is ironic, given that when Mazda toyed with the idea of a coupe version of the MX-5, they considered the name M Coupe...
 
They should just call it a 135tii and be done with it. It was clever on the concept car, and it would work just fine in production form. Simply put, its not an M1, nor will it ever be an M1. Hell, call it the 135tii by BMW Motorsport and most people will be happy enough.
 
Just call this one an M1 and then call the M1 successor the M0. Now that has a edgy sound to it. M-ZERO!

Or they can stick with their more contemporary nomenclature and call it the 146TiT-iTouringUnicronBravo.
 
Simply put, its not an M1, nor will it ever be an M1.

:odd:

Why? It's an M version of the 1-Series. That makes it an M1, in the same way an M3 is an M version of the 3er and the M5 is an M version of the 5er. M1 =/= some kind of sacred badge.
 
Do they? Always thought it was two.... F40, F50, F60 for the supercars (but then they made the FXX... so now they're out of numbers!) and then 308, 348, 355, 360, 430, etcetera for the lower-rung "sportscars" (never mind that the Scuderia versions have supercar pace...)... well two conventions for their modern line-up... don't know how they did the historical ones...
They do. For example:
308, 348, 355, 360, 430
Overall Displacement-#Cylinders, Overall Displacement-#Cylinders, Overall Displacement-Valves per cylinder, Overall Displacement, Overall Displacement (and with the 458 right back to Overall Displacement-#Cylinders).

The V12 cars are even more fun.
For example, in order of release (ish):
364GT4/BB, 512BB, 400i GT, 412 Automatic, 512TR, 456GT, 550 Maranello, 612 Scaglietti, 599 GTB.
Displacement per cylinder, Total Displacement-#Cylinders, Displacement per cylinder, Displacement per cylinder and Number of Cylinders, Total Displacement-#Cylinders, Displacement per cylinder, Total Displacement, Total Displacement-#Cylinders and (for the really fun one) Total Displacement in Deciliters.

M1 =/= some kind of sacred badge.
Except it really sort of is.
 
Last edited:
They do. For example:

snip

Doh. Totally forgot the GTs! As that puts it... they're using four or five different conventions at any one time... insane!

Except it really sort of is.

With all of the hysteresis BMW has gone through trying to protect the "M" moniker, it's amazing they haven't sued the US Army, yet...

Abrams-transparent.png
 
Back