0-400m help

i know that i need to put the springs and ride height at maximum but i need help on the gear ratios for example do i put each ratio to the left or right my supra rz has 1081hp but gets 10.5XX on the 0-400 run do you of you have any tips on getting that time quicker.
 

10 REM Query
20 PRINT Is your query Settings & Tuning Related?
30 GOTO Settings & Tuning forum and ask there
40 END
 
Originally posted by twinturbosupra
i know that i need to put the springs and ride height at maximum

the ride height needs to be at the minimum to reduce drag....
but i need help on the gear ratios for example do i put each ratio to the left or right my supra rz has 1081hp but gets 10.5XX on the 0-400 run do you of you have any tips on getting that time quicker.

gear ratios set at closest but with 1081hp set the first pretty high so wheel spin isnt as much a prollem.
also try a bit of tcs.

failing that, post in the correct forum :P
 
All items that produce drag must be minimized. Camber, toe-in, down-force, etc. The only exception to this is ride height. It actually has to be all the way up to achieve faster times. I don't know why but it contradicts general physical laws. Needless to say, power should be as high as possible and weight as low as possible. 2WD cars might want to use normal front tires, 4WD Super soft.

Gearing; First gear should be rather high to prevent wheel spin. Following gears must be "rather" close, ~level 25. I suggest setting differential to a very low ratio (high number) like 4.0 or 4.5 (experiment with this) then set the level to around 25 (experiment with this) then set the differential to a higher ratio, maybe around 2.5 - 3.5. You will have a rather high first gear and closley grouped higher gears. This should give very good acceleration and little wheel spin.

TCS should be as close to off as possible as it eats engine power. I use 1. ASM should be off as it eats power and is not necessary going in a straight line. On a 4WD car, VCD should be removed as it uses engine power.

Throttle technique is very important, when exactly to hit the button before the green light. This can make a 0.2 second difference from fastest time to slowest.

Following these general rules and endlessly adjusting my gear ratios, I got the Skyline R34 to do the 400m in 9.057seconds.

Happy motoring.:D
 
Originally posted by Donn Engler
The only exception to this is ride height. It actually has to be all the way up to achieve faster times. I don't know why but it contradicts general physical laws.
The reason you want ride height up high is to get the roll center of the car as high as possible (actually, it's "pitch" when you're talking about fore-and-aft motion). This really helps weight transfer, so that you can get as much pressure as possible on the rear wheels under acceleration, to maximize traction on the drive wheels.

That's why RWD dragsters typically have that "jacked up" look in back. Actually, strictly from a weight transfer point of view, it's best if both ends are high. However, that can lead to bad aerodynamics at high speed, when you definitely do not want air getting under the front of the car. But in general, drag racers want the car up high so that the maximum amount of weight transfers to the rear as quickly as possible. This isn't the picture I was looking for, but it's a good illustration:

photos\photos\63post6.jpg


Look how high that car is set off the ground, and it's not just to clear the giant rear tires. That could be accomplished by tubbing out the trunk to make room, if it was better for the car to sit low. The body is sitting almost level, but look how high the front wheels are off the ground!

FWD dragsters obviously want to minimize weight transfer, so there you'd want your ride height set as low as possible to lower the roll center. Also, for handling purposes, body roll in turns hurts you more than pitch helps you. That's why on a non-drag car, you prefer to run the lowest ride height you can without bottoming the suspension on bumps.
 
That's all cool and everything, but the car is 4WD. I had at first set it up with high back and low front. The times were good but became better with high / high. Yeah, come to think of it, I also removed the center variable differential. I can't say what the default setting is for torque transfer but I would assume 50/50. That would tell me I'm putting most of the weight onto a 50% torque axle while removing weight from the other 50% torque axle.
Whatever, it does work, but I still have not beaten 9.057 in the 400m with the SkylineR34
 
I've got a 0:09.054 with the R34 GT-R V-Spec II (TCS and ASM turned off (0)).

On my next site update there will be a new page with descriptions on how to get fast times without TCS and ASM by changing the settings around.

All the 1/4 mile times on this page have been done without TCS and ASM on...

The guide was written by a regular contributor to the site.
 
if you wanted weight at the back why not raise the front and lower the rear, thats what they did on gassers, but ive found the best way to get good times, run something with a 787b engine(26b 4 rotar) and dont hit the gas untill it says go, be very persice on hitting the gas and the engine will bog enough that you wont need tcs but that bog will prevent wheelspin and get you down the track faster, also a slight amount of df on the back never hurt much.
 
Last I knew, the only thing the 787b engine came in was the 787b. :confused: I suppose you must have some of that cheat stuff.:yuck:

Anyway I haven't tried that stance or the engine bogging part. That will come next time I have a free day to play with it.
 
Hello this is my first post on GT planet. I'm so glad I've found this site. It's renewed my interest in GT3. Anyways I've gotten my R34 GTR V-spec II down to 9.038@161mph. I don't have a way to prove it other than taking a picture of the screen. I've been thinking about getting a xport or sharkport to upload my replays so they can be comfirmed they aren't hybrids or anything. So should I go with the xport or sharkport?
 
That's a great time netrat! Best verified time I've seen is 9.046. Are you NTSC or PAL? I'm NTSC and have had no problem with a sharkport. I've heard that the Xport works with either, but don't know from personal experience. I'm not at all sure that the sharkport is PAL compatible.
 
Xport and Sharkport are one and the same. So "yes" :D

Welcome to GTP, netrat!
 
Back