Oh yeah, I called that. True, I didn't pick the Kovalainen-Glock-Raikkonen combination, but I still predicted a winner who wasn't one of the Usual Supects.I don't know about that ... five different winners in as many years leads me to think otherwise.
You are a member of the GTP Lucky Coin Man Appreciation Society
God bless Damon Hill, he needs the patience of a saint not to lamp Mr Allen.
If you look at a F1 car you'll see that the exhaust pipes tend to be just below the fuelling cap. These exhauts get extremely hot so once some fuel drops onto it it ignites. And being racing fuel it'll give a quick, intense but relatively short burn. The theory voiced on the commentary which I think is possible is that the heat of the day caused the fuel to expand and so effected the sealing and shut off systems in the refueling rig.I would have assumed that the air temperature and the car's residual heat was so hot that whenever the pit refuellers didn't quite shut the flow of petrol as they were taking the hose off, it would immediately catch fire and go. Or there were some clumsy fingers and didn't quite get the hose on right.
It was quite surprising how quickly they caught fire though after only being exposed to the air for a very short period of time. Goes to show exactly how voliate they are.
But still, it happens quite frequently during the race. I'm surprised that it wasn't really that hot and yet the pit lane temperature was about 80°F (where Malaysia was hotter) but I guess it just wasn't as humid as Malaysia, so it was likely the fueling rig may caught on fire when they refuel the car. But wow, a very scary moment for the pit crew. The fuel tank maker may have to improve the way the nozzle is built to make sure it doesn't happen again.....If you look at a F1 car you'll see that the exhaust pipes tend to be just below the fuelling cap. These exhauts get extremely hot so once some fuel drops onto it it ignites. And being racing fuel it'll give a quick, intense but relatively short burn. The theory voiced on the commentary which I think is possible is that the heat of the day caused the fuel to expand and so effected the sealing and shut off systems in the refueling rig.
Oh definetely, 3 relatively small events that had the ability to be much worse will definetley push the manufacturer to improve.But still, it happens quite frequently during the race. I'm surprised that it wasn't really that hot and yet the pit lane temperature was about 80°F (where Malaysia was hotter) but I guess it just wasn't as humid as Malaysia, so it was likely the fueling rig may caught on fire when they refuel the car. But wow, a very scary moment for the pit crew. The fuel tank maker may have to improve the way the nozzle is built to make sure it doesn't happen again.....
That was a pretty interesting race. Tough break for Massa, but at least Raikkonen woke up at the end of the race.
Oh definetely, 3 relatively small events that had the ability to be much worse will definetley push the manufacturer to improve.
Raikkonen was stuck behind Alonso. As soon as he got in front of Alonso he was setting fastest laps. It may have been for the best that he backed off at the end, but it would have been nice to seem him try for a pass on Glock. I felt bad for Massa. Before Hamilton's flat it looked like it was going to be a close battle at the end.
^Uh... Massa at the first corner of the first lap?
I think Damon hill was a good commentator considering he doesn't do it often. And anyway, James Allen made the mistake of thinking Glock pitted for a 3rd time when it said Trulli on the screen.