- 6,356
- Michigan
- DaveTheStalker
Am I the only one that thinks that NASCAR should do a 1000 mile endurance race somewhere?
I firmly believe that NASCAR should make use of that gorgeous new track in Austin Texas!!!
Am I the only one that thinks that NASCAR should do a 1000 mile endurance race somewhere?
Kurt/Kahne both had some strong cars all race long, sucks Kurt can't seem to finish the deals as close as he has been.
This was a weird 600 with the wrecks and stuff.
Or they could do a 1000 km race. They only need to add 15-20 laps to the 600.
It is. I believe a 600 Km race there would be 375 laps. But 1000 km there would be 624 laps. That's too long for any track.Isn't the Phoenix race measured in km? There's a precedent.
Talladega 1000 mile race with no restrictor plates. It would still be done before the 600 was last night.
No one wants to watch that happen.
Without restrictor plates, there would be less pack racing, and less giant crashes. The sheer speed would be a spectacle, and some people would definitely rather watch that than the typical Talladega parade for 450 miles, with giant pile-ups during the last 50 miles.
Higher speeds = higher closing rates, whether or not they are in packs. The cars are built to be safe at speeds up to 200mph. No one wants to be the driver that finds out the cars aren't safe at speeds of over 215mph.
215? Rusty in I believe 2003 went over 230 MPH in a car that weighed more then the Gen 6, with an engine that didn't produce as much horsepower (Maybe a hundred or so HP difference? They typically produce about 10-15 more HP per year), and out of the draft.
I'd fully expect them to at least be approaching X2010 speeds in the draft (Not 300, more like 270)
"It was a helluva deal that I certainly will remember for the rest of my life," Wallace added. "We'd all been wondering what it would feel like to run at Talladega again without the plates, and now I know. I'll bet we could be running speeds up to 235 without the plates if we spent time doing some tweaking. But I'll tell you this—there's no way we could be out there racing at those speeds. It was neat to be out there running that fast by myself, but it would be insane to think we could have a pack of cars out there doing that."
So the comment section on NASCAR's website has a new excuse:
"Comments are currently unavailable. Were working on the development of a NASCAR fan forum please stay tuned."
I don't think it took Jordan half a year to develop and put up GTPlanet...... nevermind this is a multi-billion dollar corporation.
Been like that ever since the redesign.
Might just have to run a 1000 mile Dega race on NR2003, simulate it to see how long it lasts![]()
The record pace for a 500 mile race at Talladega with restrictor plates is approximately 188mph, done by Mark Martin in 1997, when the entire race was completed without a caution. If you extrapolated this out for the 1000-mile race with restrictor plates in place and no cautions, the race would take just over 5 hours and 18 minutes. Add cautions, and you're looking at something like a 6 to 7 hour race, with plates.
So the comment section on NASCAR's website has a new excuse:
"Comments are currently unavailable. Were working on the development of a NASCAR fan forum please stay tuned."
I don't think it took Jordan half a year to develop and put up GTPlanet...... nevermind this is a multi-billion dollar corporation.
FurinkazenWhat about the 2001 EA Sports 500? The cautionless one (I think it was that one).
It must not have been completed faster, or else it would have held the record pace, right?
http://racing-reference.info/tracks/Talladega_Superspeedway
Furinkazen176.473. Seems pretty slow actually.
What numbers are you looking at? I see three cautionless races, all from 1997 through 2002, all of which have average speeds between 183 and 189 mph.
Nice to see Tony back in his legacy colors. Black and Orange!