Autosport have him saying that the team has put some restrictions in place, but he hasn't gone into detail on what those restrictions might be, except that it's not an outright team order. But yes, I could see the team replacing both of them, even if only one of them actually does something. I can't help but feel that every response to the collision has been intended for both Hamilton and Rosberg - the penalty the stewards gave was largely symbolic, and while Rosberg suffered the consequences, look at it from Hamilton's point of view: he's got two reprimands hanging over his head, and a third will net him a grid penalty; meanwhile, he expects to take at least two engine penalties in the remaining races. I think the penalty handed to Rosberg is a pretty clear message that the stewards won't hesitate to take action if they feel that it is merited, even if it is against a championship contender; neither driver will be granted any favours by their position. Even if that's not the intended message, both drivers would be fools not to hear it. Likewise, I find Niki Lauda's comments in the Austrian media to be utterly bizarre, and I can't think of a single scenario where they make sense in context. I think that's any equally-political move designed to show that the team make the decisions that affect the team; they won't tolerate their drivers settling things in the court of public opinion.
