- 30,399

- Cuddington, Cheshire
- JDA1982
I would say most of that is driven by this and the fact that most people online, specifically in relation to football, are the loud trolls who don't represent any kind of a majority. A lot of people over here have been impressed with how well the US team have been performing in this tournament. But incidents like this, don't help.Unfortunately, very few European soccer fans would respect the US no matter what the team did. The hate online right now is actually kind of impressive, especially for a team that European fans have frequently dismissed since the US isn't a "footballing nation".
You are correct, it's not the teams fault (assuming no Trump-esque interventions behind the scenes), and yes, other teams may choose to play their better players even in these circumstances, but that doesn't make it the right thing to do. The right thing to do would be not play him. If the USA win without playing him, there's zero issue of sporting integrity over the game (yeah despite everything, that still matters to some). If they win and he played, the win will be controversial and will never be respected.It's not the USMNT's fault here; they're going to roll with the best team that gives them the best chance. You would have to believe that if the player in question were Doku, Belgium wouldn't sit him. Even then, the Belgian team is ranked 9th; it seems weird they're so concerned about the US, which is ranked 16th with Balo. Belgium should be the better team and should win, even with Balo on the field.
FTAOD, I think he was unlucky to be sent off in the first place, but that's not the issue here.
Whilst not impossible, I would say it's unlikely. The Belgian players aren't going to want to get sent off by playing too dirty, and with VAR, it's harder to get away with.My worry is that the Belgian team will attempt to injure Balo and knock him out of the game.
That's a completely different matter and doesn't warrant any uproar whether someone supports Keir or not. The fact he ended up being involved probably didn't help in the endWeird, there isn't an uproar about Keir Starmer intervening:
![]()
Keir Starmer intervened in row over Mexico-England kick-off time
Fifa had been set to bring the match forward by six hours, due to a forecast of thunderstorms.www.bbc.com
Sure, it's not as impactful, but if we're going to call out heads of state getting involved in FIFA, it seems like we should be consistent. If Trump is wrong for getting involved (and he is), then so is Starmer.
Mexican officials were also involved, because they were brought into the discussion, but importantly whether it was a good decision or not, well handled or not, there were no rules being broken, ignored or twisted.
At the end of the day, there was a rule that Balogun should have been suspended for the next game, and in an unprecedented manner, that suspension has been suspended. This has never happened before.