2026 Mazda Miata (NE)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ProjectWHaT
  • 44 comments
  • 10,277 views

“I have to be very careful what I say here,” said Masashi Nakayama, the general manager at Mazda’s design division, “but we made sure that [the Mazda Iconic SP concept] will be feasible for production.”

“I decided to reopen the rotary engine development group and I gave a mission to them,” Mazda CEO Masahiro Moro told Road & Track, “that was to comply with stringent emissions regulations like LEV IV in the U.S., and Euro 7. We know that rotary is not good at complying with emissions, that was the reason we decided to discontinue it in 2012. That is a very high hurdle they have to overcome, but in the last year the progress has been very encouraging.”

“Where we are is developing the technology to pass the U.S. regulation, and we have a very good forecast now, so we are almost ready,” chief technical officer, Ryuichi Ume****a, told R&T. “The next challenge is... now you can support us in making a good business case. But technically, we are almost ready—if we see a good business case, we’re ready to go.”

Exactly how this new engine will be used remains an interesting question. In the Iconic SP, it was a range extender, recharging a battery pack on the move and giving a peak output of a claimed 365 hp. But Mazda could also potentially choose to use a more conventional hybrid layout, one that Ume****a hinted at when we spoke about the future Miata’s continued use of a manual gearbox, suggesting the more potent sports car could get a quicker transmission and therefore, by implication, a mechanical connection between engine and wheels.

“If, let’s say—and we haven’t decided anything yet—if we do go to the super sports category, then [a gearbox] should be faster,” he said, “then probably not a manual, but a more advanced transmission technology can be used.”

The Iconic SP concept also featured miniature pop-up headlight covers, inspired by the pop-ups used by some of the company’s best-known sportscars including all four generations of the RX-7. Could something like this also make production?

“We can do [pop-up headlights] in terms of technology,” Nakayama said. “For example, in the current MX-5, there is a deployable bonnet, the hood pops up [in the event of a crash]… but the question is regulation. Of course, if you could support us, we’d love to do it.”
 
If it's a 2-door, 2-seat, fixed roof sports car with a rotary engine, it should be an RX-7. There's a reason they didn't change the name when they didn't change the formula and did when they did.
 
I think they should do both and sell more of the EV for less and have the gas propulsion one as the more expensive limited edition "halo" iteration to promote the brand for enthusiasts. That way, they will have nno problem with emission regulations and will give a choice for everyone.
 
Honestly, as much as I adore my lil 1.5 manual ND, I think a small lightweight EV version could also be seriously fun. I would miss the sound though.
 
Honestly, as much as I adore my lil 1.5 manual ND, I think a small lightweight EV version could also be seriously fun. I would miss the sound though.
The problem is that if you actually do a lightweight EV (as in keep it around the same weight as the current MX5) then you'll probably end up with around 100 miles of range or less. The MX5 is a convertible, which is not very aerodynamically efficient. The best EVs batteries are around 5.5kg/kwh and the best EVs are around 3.5 miles per KWh. To achieve the little gas roadster's 400 mile range with an EV means you're needing 115kwh of battery (likely more due to the aforementioned aero efficiency problem) which results in a 1400lb battery. Delete the engine and gas tank from the ND at ~350lbs and you're looking at a 3,350lb roadster, best case scenario. Of course the chassis is not built for that kind of weight, and so everything would have to get heavier in reality...maybe 3600lbs by the time everything is beefed up.

Work the problem the other direction (keep weight the same, make the battery smaller) and you end up with a sub-30kwh battery and, at best, 100 miles of range. Neither of these scenarios work for an MX5. You could do a tweener scenario and end up in the ~3000lbs range with ~200ish miles of range, but I don't know if anyone would be happy with that.
 
Last edited:
You end up with this:
1750988303094.jpeg
 
The problem is that if you actually do a lightweight EV (as in keep it around the same weight as the current MX5) then you'll probably end up with around 100 miles of range or less. The MX5 is a convertible, which is not very aerodynamically efficient. The best EVs batteries are around 5.5kg/kwh and the best EVs are around 3.5 miles per KWh. To achieve the little gas roadster's 400 mile range with an EV means you're needing 115kwh of battery (likely more due to the aforementioned aero efficiency problem) which results in a 1400lb battery. Delete the engine and gas tank from the ND at ~350lbs and you're looking at a 3,350lb roadster, best case scenario. Of course the chassis is not built for that kind of weight, and so everything would have to get heavier in reality...maybe 3600lbs by the time everything is beefed up.

Work the problem the other direction (keep weight the same, make the battery smaller) and you end up with a sub-30kwh battery and, at best, 100 miles of range. Neither of these scenarios work for an MX5. You could do a tweener scenario and end up in the ~3000lbs range with ~200ish miles of range, but I don't know if anyone would be happy with that.
I getcha, but surely thats the thinking behind the rotary range extender? EV power delivery with the energy storage efficiency of gasoline?
 
I getcha, but surely thats the thinking behind the rotary range extender? EV power delivery with the energy storage efficiency of gasoline?
Yeah I'm definitely interested in this approach. My CR-V basically operates like this and the only downside is that higher speed acceleration is poor when it's meager 1kwh battery is depleted...it's basically relying on the 4 cylinder to provide power generation in real time, so it feels slow. The other downside is that the ICE can feel somewhat rough in power generation mode, "hive of bees". The rotary would definitely be better in this scenario in that it would be much smoother and not sound harsh. If they could get the rotary engine to work in conjunction with, say, a 20kwh battery, I think it could be a great package.
 
Yeah I'm definitely interested in this approach. My CR-V basically operates like this and the only downside is that higher speed acceleration is poor when it's meager 1kwh battery is depleted...it's basically relying on the 4 cylinder to provide power generation in real time, so it feels slow. The other downside is that the ICE can feel somewhat rough in power generation mode, "hive of bees". The rotary would definitely be better in this scenario in that it would be much smoother and not sound harsh. If they could get the rotary engine to work in conjunction with, say, a 20kwh battery, I think it could be a great package.
I’d certainly be interested to try both the ICE version and the EV version back to back and see which one I preferred. Altho I’d probably want to try living with both and theres no way I’m gonna make that happen 🤣
 
Back