2fast2furious and fast and the furious

[Dorifto]

Originally posted by 88'integrapimp
It had fake graphics in some parts of it and everything, but it was still good.

Dude read the article about it and the other cars in Sport Compact Car and then tell me its good.

 

[toyomatt84]

In all reality, the entire F&F series was a serious rip on what street racing is really like. There was mayb 2 - 3% realism in that entire series. The rest was fecal matter. There was, in all honesty, no realistic plot, a structure a squirrel could write, and a vehicular cast that made only the dumbest of drivers happy. Oh yeah, and you got to love how the script has Vin Diesel say, "Not double-clutching like you should." When there is NO possible way of him knowing that when he's not riding with whatever that white guy's name is, and especially not from his own car at a supposed 140mph.

F&F is crap, plain and simple.

 

[Klostrophobic]

Originally posted by hanker
Im sure there countless mistakes in both movies.

Yep.

2 Fast 2 Furious
The Fast and the Furious

What horrible movies.

 

[Dorifto]

Great site.One of my favorite mistakes from TFATF is the scene when Brian is trying to max out his Eclipse and he shifts 7 times. Last time I checked those Eclipses had 5 gears.

 

[Klostrophobic]

He has a super-duper 8-gear transmission. Every car should have one.

 

[TS1AWD]

Those two movies ruined the reputation for all imports. I have nightmares about that EVO. Its sad that it had to under-go that sort of modefications. All those body kits, stickers, systems... Lets all have a moment of silence.

 

[Dave A]

And the silence is broken, let's not forget the other cars that were similarly abused like the S2000, the R34 Skyline and the Supra.

 

[toyomatt84]

Heck even the Eclipse, RX-7, and R33 from the first one.

 

[Hyperglide]

Originally posted by Klostrophobic
Yep.

2 Fast 2 Furious
The Fast and the Furious

What horrible movies.

Geez louise... If they are such bad movies then how come some of the top 20 films on that site (with way more errors) have won for Best Picture, are critically lauded or won even Best Editing awards from the Academy? Surely you can agree all 20 of those movies don't suck ass (based on these errors).

Point is these facts (flaws in continuity etc.) are moot. I think the two movies deserve some merit. At least someone attempted to pine to the street culture's world.

I liked the first movie and the second. They definetly aren't my favourite but you can't say they are bad because of errors. All movies have errors like that.

 

[Klostrophobic]

The Fast and the Furious movies don't have as many errors as, say, Star Wars, because the type of people who watch TF&TF aren't going to be looking for errors. There are people who watch Star Wars 746 times to catch all the errors.

 

[tabs]

Originally posted by Hyperglide
Geez louise... If they are such bad movies then how come some of the top 20 films on that site (with way more errors) have won for Best Picture, are critically lauded or won even Best Editing awards from the Academy? Surely you can agree all 20 of those movies don't suck ass (based on these errors).

Point is these facts (flaws in continuity etc.) are moot. I think the two movies deserve some merit. At least someone attempted to pine to the street culture's world.

I liked the first movie and the second. They definetly aren't my favourite but you can't say they are bad because of errors. All movies have errors like that.

No. They're bad for other reasons as well.

Vin Diesel.
Stupid storyline.
Vin Diesel.
Horrible acting.
Vin Diesel.


Even though Vin Diesel wasn't in the 2nd one, it's still his fault.

 

[Hyperglide]

I thought the story line was fine (in the first one) compared to other films out there. What was wrong with it? You guys all say 'it sucks,' is 'stupid' or has 'plot holes' yet never explain why. I think you are all just recycling other peoples opinions, so you can feel good about conforming to other peoples opinions. What a bunch of bull****.

The second film had bad oneliners from Paul Walkers character though. I think he was trying to hard on those ebonics trying to cozy up with Tyrese's character. I winced everytime he said 'how bout them apples,' or 'dog,' etc.

 

[Dave A]

The first one was an oscar winner compared to the second, I just didn't like it, it had okay action but the plot was stupid, the whole idea of a cop being put in his position was daft, one redeeming feature though was Michelle Rodriguez although she was under used meow.

 

[69Dodge_Charger]

Originally posted by Hyperglide
I think you are all just recycling other peoples opinions, so you can feel good about conforming to other peoples opinions. What a bunch of bull****.

Either that or the majority of this community just really hates those two movies. I'll let them decide who's right though.

 

[toyomatt84]

Originally posted by Klostrophobic
The Fast and the Furious movies don't have as many errors as, say, Star Wars, because the type of people who watch TF&TF aren't going to be looking for errors. There are people who watch Star Wars 746 times to catch all the errors.

WTF are you talking about errors or the people that watch for them?

And, how the hell can you compare Star Wars to F&F. Intergalactic warfare vrs. Illegal Street Racing. Wow, such similar topics.